No Guy, my reason for being is more than you could wish to understand. I am sure whatever your believe is about me, I have still done more important things in my life that will resonate through time much more than your insignificant little being. But, do I need to even bother? More than likely, no I don't. Useless cause.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Teabaggers protest DC Metro
Collapse
X
-
Besides, again I don't understand the insult--I'm supposed to be chastized because I'm sexually passionate? I rather like it that way, as does my wife.
Oh, zakipoo, you get so adorably tongue-tied when you're all hot and bothered."My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Originally posted by zakubandit View PostFrom their perspective big government is socialist...read some of the manifesto, read some of Mao's works...big government IS in essence socialistic;
We don't disrespect you and your ilk because you're right wingers, zuku. We disrespect you because you're the political equivalent of flat-Earthers. There are right-wingers we respect. They just aren't barking-at-the-moon mad like you.Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostThey should be allowed to protest, just like the hippies in the 60s. It'll be just as useful.
It's good to see the right-wing catching up to the left-wingers from 1960s though. Closing the gap now to 40-odd years. Nicely done.
They're still clearly fascists.
Free thinkers don't attend protests like this. You'd have to be retarded to. Or a fascist!
We don't disrespect you and your ilk because you're right wingers, zuku. We disrespect you because you're the political equivalent of flat-Earthers. There are right-wingers we respect. They just aren't barking-at-the-moon mad like you.
If socialism = big government, then the Roman Empire was socialist.
So was Louis the IV.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VJ View PostYou're correct. People who oppose new government programs and demand less taxes are fascists. As a matter of fact, we should encourage our youth to beat them up and not prosecute the anti-fascist youth, then lock up all the fascists and keep their fascist reactionary imperialist mouth quiet.
It's funny that the only time you are right is when you are trying to be wrong."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Even being a regug I found the skit on SNL the other night hilarious making fun of the repugs saying that the teabaggers were a diverse group by showing shots of the protest. Look there's a black guy, "no that's a cop", look there's another, "no that a protester holding up a obama mask. I know it's quite easy to show group shots without blacks, but it was pretty funny.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
How is it insulting to call the tea-party nutjobs "teabaggers"?
Yes, teabagging is funny, but the joke is on the teabaggee, not the teabagger. Unless the teabaggee is a biter, but then it stops being a teabagging and starts being a castration.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Comment
-
No need for another thread on the subject, loin.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
He's politicizing my thread about dipping your balls in somebody's mouth Not to mention that only half of the threads on the front page have been posted in today - it's not as though we're being flooded with threads on far more worthy subjects.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Comment
-
Uh, it's pretty common practice for us not to have too many threads one one topic. You could call loin's thread a separate topic, except that that separate topic is, as usual, explicitly sexual, which is against site rules. So really, loin should be happy I didn't just close the thread.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
Comment