Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

To HalfLotus, zaku, and other anti-Fed obsessives: Judge orders Fed's FOIA disclosure within 5 days

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • To HalfLotus, zaku, and other anti-Fed obsessives: Judge orders Fed's FOIA disclosure within 5 days

    In continuation of this thread and this thread, how come you're not already back here gloating about your grand victory over the big bad devil's bank? Get on the ball!

    Fed Must Release Reports on Emergency Bank Loans, Judge Says

    By Mark Pittman and Karen Gullo

    Aug. 25 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve must make records about emergency lending to financial institutions public within five days because it failed to convince a judge the documents should be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.



    Manhattan Chief U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska rejected the central bank’s argument that the records aren’t covered by the law because their disclosure would harm borrowers’ competitive positions. The collateral lists “are central to understanding and assessing the government’s response to the most cataclysmic financial crisis in America since the Great Depression,” according to the lawsuit that led to yesterday’s ruling.

    The Fed has refused to name the borrowers, the amounts of loans or the assets put up as collateral under 11 programs, saying that doing so might set off a run by depositors and unsettle shareholders. Bloomberg LP, the New York-based company majority-owned by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, sued Nov. 7 on behalf of its Bloomberg News unit.

    “When an unprecedented amount of taxpayer dollars were lent to financial institutions in unprecedented ways and the Federal Reserve refused to make public any of the details of its extraordinary lending, Bloomberg News asked the court why U.S. citizens don’t have the right to know,” said Matthew Winkler, the editor-in-chief of Bloomberg News. “We’re gratified the court is defending the public’s right to know what is being done in the public interest.”

    ‘Involuntary Investor’

    Bloomberg said in the suit U.S. taxpayers need to know the risks behind the central bank’s $2 trillion in lending because the public is an “involuntary investor” in the nation’s banks.

    The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet about doubled beginning in September to more than $2 trillion because of a historic attempt to rescue financial institutions. For the week ended Aug. 19, Fed assets rose 2.3 percent to $2.06 trillion as the central bank bought more mortgage-backed securities. Non- government securities were allowed to be purchased by the Fed for the first time.

    The Freedom of Information Act obliges federal agencies to make government documents available to the press and public. The Bloomberg suit, filed in New York, doesn’t seek money damages.

    David Skidmore, a Fed spokesman, said the board’s staff was reviewing the ruling and declined to comment on it at this time.

    The case is Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

    Bloomberg delivers business and markets news, data, analysis, and video to the world, featuring stories from Businessweek and Bloomberg News on everything pertaining to politics

    Unbelievable!

  • #2
    This is good news.

    I understand there's a possibility of panic, but I doubt it will be all that the naysayers claim. The panic prone folks are already counting their bullion and stacking boxes of ammo. This is a legitimate request for information in an open society. It's not like we're trying to find out the identities of secret agents in Iran or anything - we just want to know where two trillion dollars went.

    John Brown did nothing wrong.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Felch View Post
      The panic prone folks are already counting their bullion and stacking boxes of ammo.

      I have no idea what you mean by this. They're not talking about a few Art Bell listeners awaiting Armageddon in bunkers beneath the Rockies, but thousands and thousands of ordinary individual and institutional investors that hold stocks & bonds in the companies that were in bad enough shape to rely on Fed loans, as well as depositors of those companies. You can't deny that massive selloffs and runs will have a negative impact on an economy that's already barely recovering. The real question is whether temporarily feeling warm and fuzzy about "open society" is a worthwhile tradeoff for that detriment.

      What concerns me even more than the sudden impact on the market will be disincentivizing future use of the Fed and therefore defeating its purpose. If you're the CEO of a major bank and you now know that taking a loan from the Fed could cause unexpected public disclosure to tank your stock a few months or years later, would you ever go back there again?
      Unbelievable!

      Comment


      • #4
        How come the Federal Reserve has to obey the Freedom of Information Act if it is a private entity controlled by the Reptilians? huh? huh?!
        urgh.NSFW

        Comment


        • #5
          Bank runs
          Starting one is one of my life goals.
          Graffiti in a public toilet
          Do not require skill or wit
          Among the **** we all are poets
          Among the poets we are ****.

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't think this will have much impact on future use of these facilities. This court case is a one-time deal only. To get this kind of information in the future, I'm sure a new lawsuit would need to be filed. And another judge may have a narrower view of what needs to be disclosed.
            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Az View Post
              How come the Federal Reserve has to obey the Freedom of Information Act if it is a private entity controlled by the Reptilians? huh? huh?!



              Originally posted by DanS View Post
              I don't think this will have much impact on future use of these facilities. This court case is a one-time deal only. To get this kind of information in the future, I'm sure a new lawsuit would need to be filed. And another judge may have a narrower view of what needs to be disclosed.

              That aside, since the Fed hasn't yet commented I think it's safe to assume they will appeal, and historically the Second Circuit has been highly deferential to Fed business judgments. I'm guessing this "deadline" would be stayed if the appeal, or at least a motion for leave to appeal, is timely filed.
              Last edited by Darius871; August 25, 2009, 12:34.
              Unbelievable!

              Comment


              • #8
                anti-Fed obsessives
                Sound money supporters

                This is small potatoes. Like Dan said it's a one time shot. It appears to be in line with Kucinich's legislation to disclose the receivers of 'bailout' money. Dr. Paul's HR 1207 goes much further.

                If this FOIA does go through and the info is revealed, I've got hard hats for sale on the cheap - they have been known to prevent injury due to falling sky.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by HalfLotus View Post
                  Dr. Paul's HR 1207 goes much further.
                  I was hoping you'd bring up that turkey again, seeing as it's been stone-dead in Committee for months as I'd predicted in the last thread. I guess some of the lukewarm "co-sponsors" in the House realized that a paltry quarter of the Senate ain't gonna cut it.
                  Unbelievable!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Siding with Fed secrecy isn't a very long limb on which to go out, nice 'prediction' though.

                    More important than the actions of our sellout Congress is that a lot more Americans are considering what the Fed does, and why.

                    A few Congress critters even had the guts to say on record that banks 'own the place'.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Art Bell
                      KH FOR OWNER!
                      ASHER FOR CEO!!
                      GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Faaip de Oiad
                        Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                        "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Aren't some heads suppose to roll when something like this happens?
                          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            An appeal... shocker there!



                            But the Fed is already fighting back. The Board of Governors has asked the judge to delay the release of the records until the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York can deal with an appeal the Fed plans to file. According to Bloomberg, an industry-owned group called The Clearing House Association filed an accompanying declaration that read in part: “There are numerous examples of financially sound institutions collapsing or suffering further financial deterioration from the loss of public confidence.”
                            Unbelievable!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              More shocking developments

                              Judge puts Fed's bailout revelations on hold

                              Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:48pm EDT

                              NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve won a delay of a federal judge's order that it reveal the names of the banks that have participated in its emergency lending programs and the sums they received.

                              Chief Judge Loretta Preska of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan stayed her August 24 order in favor of Bloomberg News, which had sought the information under the federal Freedom of Information Act, so that the central bank could appeal.

                              The Fed's board of governors has worried that disclosure would stigmatize the participating banks, threatening both them and the U.S. economy.

                              It argued disclosure threatened "irreparable harm to these institutions and to the board's ability to effectively manage the current, and any future, financial crisis."

                              The case and a similar one involving News Corp's (NWSA.O: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) Fox News Network LLC raise the issue of how much the public has a right to know about how the government is bailing out a troubled financial system.

                              The Fed was not immediately available for comment.

                              Preska directed the Fed's board of governors to file a notice of appeal and an emergency stay application with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

                              She also said Bloomberg will not, for now, insist on a search of "official files" at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, after the central bank's representation that a search would likely be fruitless.

                              The case arose when two Bloomberg reporters submitted FOIA requests about actions the Fed took to shore up the financial system in 2007 and early 2008, including an expansion of lending programs and the sale of Bear Stearns Cos to JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz).

                              The case is: Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan), No. 08-9595.

                              http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv...57R5BE20090828
                              Unbelievable!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X