Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Um. Tort Reform?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Um. Tort Reform?

    SAUDI ARABIA: A lawsuit against a genie

    Genie A family in Saudi Arabia has filed suit in a religious court against an unnamed genie, or jinn, who sounds most unpleasant: It steals cellphones, whispers threats and occasionally flings stones.

    “We began to hear strange sounds,” a family member who requested anonymity told the Saudi daily Al Watan. “At first we did not take it seriously, but then stranger things started to happen, and the children got particularly scared when the genie started throwing stones.”

    The genie -- or genies -- had demands: “A woman spoke to me first, and then a man. They said we should get out of the house,” said the family member, adding that his clan fled their home near the city of Medina.

    Jinns and genies are spirits born out of fire that have supernatural powers. They appear in the Koran and Arab mythology, creatures living between humanity and the elements. One of their most famous incarnations lived in Aladdin’s lamp.

    Sheikh Amr Al Salmi, head of the local Sharia court, said he will investigate the family’s claims that it has been harassed for two years: “We have to look into this case and verify its truthfulness despite the difficulty of
its consideration,” he told the Saudi daily. “What is interesting is that the complaint has come from every member of the family, and not just one.”

    This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.
    "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
    -Bokonon

  • #2
    Good luck serving process.
    Solomwi is very wise. - Imran Siddiqui

    Comment


    • #3
      I seem to recall God has been sued in a court of law. The plaintiff wanted to sue God for damages arising under the "acts of God" force majeure exemption for his home insurance. The judge said he would allow a default judgment provided that the plaintiff cover all deficiencies of the defendant.

      God did not pay, and so the plaintiff was exactly back where he started.
      "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Alinestra Covelia View Post
        I seem to recall God has been sued in a court of law. The plaintiff wanted to sue God for damages arising under the "acts of God" force majeure exemption for his home insurance. The judge said he would allow a default judgment provided that the plaintiff cover all deficiencies of the defendant.

        God did not pay, and so the plaintiff was exactly back where he started.
        Sorry, I disbelieve and I made my will save.

        God isn't a legal person, so you can't sue him for property damage.
        "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier

        Comment


        • #5
          Wrong. I could sue Mickey Mouse if I wanted to.
          Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
          "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
          He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Zevico View Post
            Sorry, I disbelieve and I made my will save.

            God isn't a legal person, so you can't sue him for property damage.
            The most recent case on this point is Ernie Chambers, a Nebraska state senator. The judge threw it out on a technicality - as Solomwi pointed out, there was a service problem.

            The case I heard about and described above would have happened much earlier. I'm still trying to search for it.

            I do know that "Satan and all his staff" have been named as a defendant in a case. Part of our Legal Research 101 training with Westlaw used that case as a benchmark. It also did not result in the relief prayed for but it goes to show that much bigger entities than djinn have been sued. Again, personal service was a requirement so basically the judge was telling the plaintiff to literally go to hell.
            "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

            Comment


            • #7
              Good thing those lawyers come with +3 lawful briefcases of wounding to fend off marauding demons.
              "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier

              Comment


              • #8
                Demons (aka Ba'atezu) are lawful, though. If they were going up against devils (aka Tanar'ri) then maybe those +3 lawful briefcases would be helpful...
                "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

                Comment


                • #9
                  You're mixing them up. Demons are Tanar'ri, and chaotic evil.
                  "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                  "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                  "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Really?

                    I clearly wouldn't last a second in the Abyss.
                    "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X