Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Honduras: Army 1, President 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I guess the secret to being rich is to have a small Latin America country, and be critical of the US. And then receive over 200 million dollars in development aid.

    While 200 million is a drop in the bucket for the overall economic problems in the US, I'm sure there are better things we could be doing with that money. We should be helping our friends, not countries who want to paint the US as the bad guy for political reasons.
    Keep on Civin'
    RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Ming View Post
      I guess the secret to being rich is to have a small Latin America country, and be critical of the US. And then receive over 200 million dollars in development aid.

      While 200 million is a drop in the bucket for the overall economic problems in the US, I'm sure there are better things we could be doing with that money. We should be helping our friends, not countries who want to paint the US as the bad guy for political reasons.
      Excellent point Ming

      Same goes for folks who want to be liberated from occupying forces, they scream, ask for Uncle Sam and then protest the US being mean and heavy handed
      Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

      Comment


      • #18
        It appears Drake likes right-wing dictators but does not like leaders who are chosen by the majority of the citizens.


        I like democracy.
        KH FOR OWNER!
        ASHER FOR CEO!!
        GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Grandpa Troll View Post
          Excellent point Ming

          Same goes for folks who want to be liberated from occupying forces, they scream, ask for Uncle Sam and then protest the US being mean and heavy handed
          That's because we are the occupying force.
          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
          "Capitalism ho!"

          Comment


          • #20
            Not really. The legislature could've just ignored his referendum. This was backed by people with $$... more likely than not it's just the same old same old for the govts of Latin America.
            The referendum is being performed through the state, so the legislature ignoring his referendum would be them turning a blind eye to the gross abuse of executive power.

            Not only that, he was trying to use the Army to conduct the referendum. The Army chief, true to the constitution, refused to obey the illegal order and was fired for it (how is that for a change in Latin Americna politics!). This is what prompted the more drastic action, authorized specifically by the other two branches of government.

            The army in this instance is a perfect example of how true democratic institutions have evolved in that area.
            "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Darius871 View Post
              So suppose Bush had said before the GOP primaries "you know what, I'm gonna run for a third term, and to hell with all you naysayers, I'll just hold a referendum to scrap that pesky 22nd Amendment," and the GOP was on board with this decision, but the SCOTUS issues a ruling that the referendum would be unconstitutional (for noncompliance with Article 5, though I'm not aware of any analogue to that in Honduras) and Congress passes a nonbinding resolution that concurs, so Bush just pulls a Jackson and tells the SCOTUS "good luck enforcing it," and in response a regiment from the 82nd Airborne walks into the White House and places him under arrest until after his replacement can be elected and inaugurated. Would that be a "coup," or just enforcement of the Constitution by the last institution standing? There's really no black-letter provision that could clear this up.
              In the US the military doesn't have policing powers, that's different in other countries.

              Comment


              • #22
                I think you might want to read the US officer oath if you think that. Deposing the President is most definetly in the scope of the US military if he was pulling something like this guy did. We are not the first instrument to be turned to for sure, but if push comes to shove...

                And it would look pretty much just like this. I am curious if there are national law enforcement entities that can be turned to in Honduras, and if they are did they refuse to/proved incabale of deposing the president? It is not uncommon for the militaries of such nations to be a good portion of the national law enforcement apparatus themselves.
                "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Yeah, it's nice to see latin military group supporting their constitution.
                  It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                  RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by rah View Post
                    Yeah, I don't consider it a Military Coup unless a General is made president. Or they say the heck with a president and the General is in charge. This seems a bit more gray.
                    Indeed. It is vastly different in this case. Supreme Court and Congress saying the President is violating the Constitution, so the military goes in and deposes the President and turns power back to the Congress.
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I'm not sure that the military is supporting the constitution. Sounds like President Zelaya tried to get a referendum on the ballot. The supreme court said, "tain't legal." The President tried to bypass that decision and the legislature, who also opposed the referendum, by using the Army to distribute the referendum directly to the people. The Army refused and their commander was fired. The legislature then voted a different person as President, and the Army arrested the current President. Apparently, the actions in the previous sentence are beyond their powers in the the current constitution.

                      If the paragraph above summarizes actions to date, then supporters of DEMOCRACY must support the restoration of Zelaya, the ELECTED President. The referendum will not appear on the ballot, but removal of the Pres must be done legally, not by having the most guns. The coup underway must be undone.
                      No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
                      "I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        The legislature then voted a different person as President, and the Army arrested the current President. Apparently, the actions in the previous sentence are beyond their powers in the the current constitution.
                        I believe the legeslature voted in a new president after the old one was deposed.

                        From the Honduran constitution:

                        Article 42 strips citizenship rights from those who call for the re-election or continuing (beyond the term) of the President of the Republic.

                        Article 239 not only prohibits the re-election of a President of the Republic, but calls for the immediate removal from public office and disqualification from any political office for 10 years any person who calls for a change in that prohibition.
                        Not a litteral quote. The question then is who is responsible for removing the President from office?
                        "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          wow

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Patroklos, where did you get that analysis of the Honduran constitutional articles? Good stuff!
                            No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
                            "I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I lifted it off another forum. I can't vouch personally for accuracy, but I have no reason to doubt the poster.

                              And it can just as easily be the other way around. If you follow a bad constitution, there isn't much good in that. But I agree that yes, this Honduran guy was probably unsuitable to continue as President. That doesn't, however, make a military coup a good thing. Good? No. But this isn't...
                              "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                On a related note, it is absolutely hilarious listening to Chavez, Morales and Correa talk about military action
                                "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X