[serious] Are Europeans still capable of genocide?

[Blaupanzer]

Though between frogs and krauts themselves it's all love these days

Right. You can make them play nice, but in their hearts ...

[BeBMan]

More terrorist attacks
More popularity for anti-Muslim parties
More restrictions on Islam
More riots by Muslims

Rinse, repeat, wait for genocide?

That's a really simplistic view on things. The 'riots', if you mean those in France esp. 2005, weren't about religion, but mostly about social issues, often related to immigration. While many participants were muslims indeed, they weren't all, and it didn't stop immigrants with christian background from joining the party as well.

And what limitations on islam do you mean?

[Spiffor]

Yes, in less than 20 years, no problem if the conditions are right.

The Romani will be the first victims.

[Heraclitus]

Don't you remember your southern slav bros?

Modern western European country.

[Provost Harrison]

I forgot to add the serious mark, can a mod please fix that?

The only way to fix this thread is to delete it

[Heraclitus]

Yes, in less than 20 years, no problem if the conditions are right.

The Romani will be the first victims.

What are the right conditons? I'm asking this question in light of European elections where far right and Eurosceptical parties gained significant ground.

[Provost Harrison]

Though between frogs and krauts themselves it's all love these days

Yeah, right...you feel about the French...well...about the same as we think about the French

[Heraclitus]

I think they are. Just let more WWII veterans die first.

Well depends on which WWII veterans you are refering too.


There is quite abit of historical revisionism going on over here. The collaborators once a hated minority have now managed to make themselves and their cause a part of the mainstream right vilifying the commies saying that making a pledge to help the SS and Greater Germany under Hitler to fight against "bandits and communists" (read the resistance movement) with the full support of the archbishop of Ljubljana was the only thing any democracy loving Euro would have done.

[Provost Harrison]

I mean, Jesus, who still cares about WWII in a political context? It's ancient history?

[Heraclitus]

Yeah, right...you feel about the French...well...about the same as we think about the French

Oh come on what would the English do without the French? I mean you guys have been at it since the 100 years war.

[Provost Harrison]

It's a bit like boxing...yeah, it hurts and someone could be seriously injured...but it's still just a bit of fun

[Heraclitus]

I mean, Jesus, who still cares about WWII in a political context? It's ancient history?

I agree.


But the right in my country don't. They keep draging it and the post-war mass execution of suspected collaborators (teh evils of teh commies) up when they run out of failed policies to advocate.



Also certain citizens of a ME state might dissagree too.

[Heraclitus]

Also isn't the last thing Britain has to be proud of is its victory in WW2?

[Provost Harrison]

No! It was us winning the World Cup in 1966 of course!

[Elok]

Yes, in less than 20 years, no problem if the conditions are right.

The Romani will be the first victims.

Will we set up a sovereign Romany state afterwards? If so, where?

In response to the OP, I think twenty years is more than enough time for any country in the world to degenerate to complete barbarism.