Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The revenge of Joe Biden?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Abortion is about womens rights, which is part of civil rights.
    No, its not.
    "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by MikeH View Post
      Abortion is about womens rights, which is part of civil rights.
      Problem is that it is also (for the other side), about unborn rights. So you have rights against rights.
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by MikeH View Post
        They are in the UK, Europe and other political climates where religion is properly separated from politics.
        You probably also didn't have a court system that sought to poison and harden the debate over the abortion issue.
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
          Problem is that it is also (for the other side), about unborn rights. So you have rights against rights.

          So it's still a civil rights issue then, just a more complicated one.
          Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
          Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
          We've got both kinds

          Comment


          • #50
            Drake doesn't know that much about civil rights issues as he thinks he does.


            Probably not. I still know a lot more than you, though.
            KH FOR OWNER!
            ASHER FOR CEO!!
            GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

            Comment


            • #51
              Then feel free to answer my questions in my other post.
              A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

              Comment


              • #52
                We've answered them all before; GP explained it well to you just a few weeks ago. You don't seem interested in actually learning the truth, though. Too bad...
                KH FOR OWNER!
                ASHER FOR CEO!!
                GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Right. It was only a coincidence that white Southerners went over to Republican party during civil rights movement. The civil rights movement had nothing to do with this demographic-political change.

                  Got it.
                  A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    The civil rights movement had nothing to do with this demographic-political change.


                    Exactly. It was only after the civil rights movement achieved its mission that Southerners began to drift to the Republican party that better represented their economic and social viewpoints. Democratic racism kept the South blue much longer than would've been the case otherwise.

                    It was only a coincidence that white Southerners went over to Republican party during civil rights movement.


                    They went over after the civil right movement.
                    KH FOR OWNER!
                    ASHER FOR CEO!!
                    GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Okay - replace the word "during" with "after" then.

                      Even given that this change took place after the civil rights movement, you cannot tell me that the aftermath of civil rights movement had nothing to do with the demographic-political change among white Southerners. It was a racist counterreaction movement, which is why Richard Nixon sought to appeal to white Southerners during his campaign with promise to reverse or delay effect of civil rights legislation. Which is also why such a significantly greater number of minority group members now follow the Democratic party rather than the Republican party; it's one of the legacies of the civil rights movement.

                      During or after - does not chnage the validity of my argument. If you only want to focus on Democrats who were racist during this time period, how do you explain the fact that black voters in Nortern cities began to shift to Democratic party during Great Depression? The effforts of Martin Luther King Jr. to work with Lyndon B. Johnson on civil rights issues during 1960s?
                      A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        And another point - right for women to have abortion, and equal rights protection for gays and lesbians are most certainly civil rights issues. You can also draw some legitimate parallels with that of the civil rights movement among blacks. Some blacks such as Jesse Jackson believe in drawing such comparisons. Unless I'm mistakened, Loretta Scott King also supported equal rights for gays and lesbians?

                        Face it - gays and lesbians do not have equal civil rights protection in United States yet. Which is why we see our struggle as a civil rights struggle/movement.
                        A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Which is also why such a significantly greater number of minority group members now follow the Democratic party rather than the Republican party; it's one of the legacies of the civil rights movement.


                          No, it isn't. Minorities were already majority Democratic back in the New Deal coalition. The fact that the Democrats finally gave up on institutionalized racism in the 60s simply allowed the few remaining black holdouts to vote without shame for the Democratic party that best represented their economic and social viewpoints.

                          how do you explain the fact that black voters in Nortern cities began to shift to Democratic party during Great Depression?


                          Because the Democratic party best represented their economic and social viewpoints. This isn't rocket science...
                          KH FOR OWNER!
                          ASHER FOR CEO!!
                          GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            And what social viewpoints might some of those had been at that time if not support for civil rights protection and legislation among non-racist Democrats?

                            I'm not arguing with you though, that the other part of explanation in Great Depression was basic econnomic interests.
                            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X