Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Murdoch websites to start charging for content?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Murdoch websites to start charging for content?

    Welcome to 2002.



    Murdoch: Web sites to charge for content

    Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch expects News Corporation-owned newspaper Web sites to start charging users for access within a year in a move he says could radically shake-up the culture of freely available content.

    Speaking on a conference call as News Corporation announced a 47 percent slide in quarterly profits to $755 million, Murdoch said the current free access business model favored by most content providers was flawed.

    "We are now in the midst of an epochal debate over the value of content and it is clear to many newspapers that the current model is malfunctioning," the News Corp. Chairman and CEO said.

    "We have been at the forefront of that debate and you can confidently presume that we are leading the way in finding a model that maximises revenues in return for our shareholders... The current days of the Internet will soon be over."

    Murdoch said the experience of the News Corp.-owned Wall Street Journal had proved that charging for content could be made to work. Would you pay to use news Web sites? Sound Off below

    He said 360,000 people had downloaded an iPhone WSJ application in three weeks and said users would soon be made to pay "handsomely" for accessing WSJ content.

    Murdoch said he envisaged News Corporation titles introducing charges within 12 months.
    Don't Miss

    * Newspapers fold as readers defect and economy sours
    * Boston Globe backs off threat to shut paper down

    Murdoch's international newspaper empire includes the New York Post, the News International stable of UK titles including the Sun and the Times, and a cluster of Australian papers including the Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun.

    His comments come with the U.S. newspaper industry in a state of crisis amid plunging advertising revenues and falling circulations.

    Earlier this week, the 137-year-old Boston Globe said it would be forced to shut down unless it reached an agreement with unions over a $10 million program of cost-cutting measures.

    The paper's owners, The New York Times Co., postponed plans to close the paper after reaching a deal with six of seven employees' unions but said the Globe was expected to lose $85 million in 2009 if it did not make major cuts.

    The developments come amid a raft of newspaper closings and cuts that have seen the end of print editions of The Rocky Mountain News in Denver, Colorado; The Seattle Post-Intelligencer; and The Christian Science Monitor.

    The Rocky Mountain News shut down completely; both the Seattle paper and the Christian Science Monitor remain in online editions.

    At least 120 newspapers in the U.S. have shut down since January 2008, according to Paper Cuts, a Web site tracking the newspaper industry. More than 21,000 jobs at 67 newspapers have vaporized in that time, according to the site.

    The company that owns the Chicago Sun-Times and 58 other newspapers and online sites said in late March that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. said it would continue to operate its newspapers and Web sites as usual while it improves its cost structure and stabilizes operations.

    Murdoch also called for tougher efforts to tackle copyright infringements and said media companies had been "passive in the face of obvious violations of intellectual property rights."
    advertisement

    Despite the general mood of gloom over the state of the economy, Murdoch said he believed the worst of the financial crisis had passed.

    "I'm not an economist and we all know economists were created to make weather forecasters look good," he said. "But it is increasingly clear the worst is over."
    "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
    Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

  • #2
    How does Rupert Murdoch manage to sound so evil? He doesn't just sound like a greedy corporate mogul; he sounds like an evil man who delights in the suffering of others.
    Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
    "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

    Comment


    • #3
      I loved his "handsomely" comment.
      "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
      Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

      Comment


      • #4
        Charging for WSJ content is totally different than charging for content from his local rags.
        The WSJ was one of the few Business Pubs to get away with charging for extra content.
        All the other pubs, like Business Week, Forbes, and Fortune tried, but failed. The WSJ is a superior brand and provides information people really want and feel they can't get anywhere else.


        Speaking on a conference call as News Corporation announced a 47 percent slide in quarterly profits to $755 million, Murdoch said the current free access business model favored by most content providers was flawed.
        Here is simply wrong... basing his whole argument on the ability of WSJ to charge for content. Most others that have tried have failed. As long as people can get what they want for free from somewhere else, they aren't going to pay for it.
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #5
          Equating the New York Post with the WSJ.

          [action=DanS]chuckles[/action]
          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Ming View Post
            Here is simply wrong... basing his whole argument on the ability of WSJ to charge for content. Most others that have tried have failed. As long as people can get what they want for free from somewhere else, they aren't going to pay for it.
            Ming, while I agree that he is wrong, I don't that that he's trying to be right.

            By putting it in the guise of a necessity (or a flaw in others' plans) he risks less anger than by saying "look what we can do because we're the WSJ. The rest of the suckers have to give it away for free".

            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
            Stadtluft Macht Frei
            Killing it is the new killing it
            Ultima Ratio Regum

            Comment


            • #7
              Right now... I think he is using scare tactics to force concessions with his unions. But, are they really "scare" tactics if their is truth behind them. The business model of the daily newspaper is changing. Markets can no longer support two major metro newspapes. Many will die (or end up only on line) with many smaller markets lossing their only paper.

              The Washington Post and New York Times will probably survive in the long run, because of their National appeal and their reputations. Who knows about the rest. USA Today has put many small newspapers out of business... and may become the defacto newspaper in many markets.
              Keep on Civin'
              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • #8
                Good. No one will go to them after that.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The New York Post is far funnier than the WSJ.
                  KH FOR OWNER!
                  ASHER FOR CEO!!
                  GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ming View Post
                    USA Today has put many small newspapers out of business... and may become the defacto newspaper in many markets.
                    NY Post > USA Today, if only because the USA Today is so painfully unfunny and just as wrong that it's the wonderbread of newspapers.

                    I.E., good for nothing other than being the bed that Harold's Fried Chicken rests on.
                    B♭3

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I like the USA today when I'm traveling. It's like a newspaper lite. It has the basic information I need when I'm traveling. The sports scores, national weather map, and the one major headline of the day. ANd it has a life section if I need to take a dump.
                      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X