In a debate about whether foreigners should be allowed to buy real estate in Croatia after we join EU, I was quick to point out that of course they should, it is part of EU agreements and practice that nationals of member states can buy property in any of the countries.
But then comes Denmark and torpedoes my argument.
Apparently, you are prohibited from buying real estate in Denmark unless you have lived there for 5 years, or something like that. This applies even to nationals of other EU member states. Not much info in English about this, but here is some:
Anyway, if Denmark has such prohibitions, why should we not have them?
Consider this:
Typical seaside Denmark:

Typical seaside Croatia:

Let us ignore for the moment the obvious question of why would anyone want to buy property in Denmark in the first place, and focus on why this discriminatory practice in which Danish nationals can buy real estate everywhere (UK, France...) but won't permit purchase of their own is being allowed to continue?
But then comes Denmark and torpedoes my argument.
Apparently, you are prohibited from buying real estate in Denmark unless you have lived there for 5 years, or something like that. This applies even to nationals of other EU member states. Not much info in English about this, but here is some:
Anyway, if Denmark has such prohibitions, why should we not have them?
Consider this:
Typical seaside Denmark:

Typical seaside Croatia:

Let us ignore for the moment the obvious question of why would anyone want to buy property in Denmark in the first place, and focus on why this discriminatory practice in which Danish nationals can buy real estate everywhere (UK, France...) but won't permit purchase of their own is being allowed to continue?
Comment