Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Diplomacy in the Hopenchange Era

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • They aren't removing the rights of the arabs to live there. They were only building apartments over some random food vendor stalls that were not paying taxes so their leases expired (iirc).
    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
    ){ :|:& };:

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
      They aren't removing the rights of the arabs to live there. They were only building apartments over some random food vendor stalls that were not paying taxes so their leases expired (iirc).
      Well, maybe the person who added this to wikipedia is an idiot:
      Spoiler:
      Following the 1967 annexation, Israel conducted a census in East Jerusalem and granted permanent Israeli residency to those Arab Jerusalemites present at the time of the census. Those not present lost the right to reside in Jerusalem. Jerusalem Palestinians were permitted to apply for Israeli citizenship, provided they met the requirements for naturalization—such as swearing allegiance to Israel and renouncing all other citizenships—which most of them refused to do. At the end of 2005, 93% of the Arab population of East Jerusalem had permanent residency and 5% had Israeli citizenship.[27]

      As residents, East Jerusalemites rejecting Israeli citizenship have the right to vote in municipal elections and play a role in the administration of the city. Residents pay taxes, and following a 1988 Israeli Supreme Court ruling, East Jerusalem residents are guaranteed the right to social security benefits and state health care.

      Until 1995, those who lived abroad for more than seven years or obtained residency or citizenship in another country were deemed liable to lose their residency status. In 1995, Israel began revoking permanent residency status from former Arab residents of Jerusalem who could not prove that their "center of life" was still in Jerusalem. This policy was rescinded four years later after it was discovered that more Arabs were moving back in order to retain their status. In March 2000, the Minister of the Interior, Natan Sharansky, stated that the "quiet deportation" policy would cease, the prior policy would be reverted, and Arab natives to Jerusalem would be able to regain residency[28] if they could prove that they have visited Israel at least once every three years. Since December 1995, permanent residency of more than 3,000 individuals "expired," leaving them with neither citizenship nor residency.[28] Despite changes in policy under Sharansky, in 2006 the number of former Arab Jerusalemites to lose their residency status was 1,363, a sixfold increase on the year before.[29] The loss of status is automatic and sometimes occurs without their knowledge.

      According to the Israeli non-governmental organization B'Tselem, since the 1990s, policies that made construction permits harder to obtain for Arab residents have caused a housing shortage that forces many of them to seek housing outside East Jerusalem.[30] Furthermore, East Jerusalem residents that are married to residents of the West Bank and Gaza have had to leave Jerusalem to join their husbands and wives due to the citizenship law. Furthermore, many have had to leave Jerusalem in search of work abroad since, in the aftermath of the Second Intifada East Jerusalem has increasingly been cut off from the West Bank and thereby has lost its main economic hub.[31] Israeli journalist Shahar Ilan argues that this outmigration has led many Palestinians in East Jerusalem to lose their permanent residency status.[32]

      According to the American Friends Service Committee and Marshall J. Breger, such restrictions on Palestinian planning and development in East Jerusalem are part of Israel's policy of promoting a Jewish majority in the city.[33][34] On May 13, 2007, the Israeli Cabinet began discussion regarding a proposition to expand Israel's presence in East Jerusalem and boost its economy so as to attract Jewish settlers. To facilitate more Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem, the Cabinet is now considering an approximately 5.75 billion NIS plan to reduce taxes in the area, relocate a range of governmental offices, construct new courthouses, and build a new center for Jerusalem studies.[35] Plans to construct 25,000 Jewish homes in East Jerusalem are in the development stages. As Arab residents are hard-pressed to obtain building permits to develop existing infrastructure or housing in East Jerusalem, this proposition has received much criticism.[36][37]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Jerusalem#Residency

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gribbler View Post
        So what if we offend Israel? If Israel decided it didn't want to be a US ally anymore I wouldn't care too much.

        Your personal opinion, retarded as it may be, regarding Israel as an ally was not the point. Apparently, Obama saw the need to put up appearances to mend fences as it were with Israel, hence the face to face with Netanyahu. Therefore, he was at least implicitly stating the advantages of improved Israel-US relations.

        Or perhaps you are of the opinion that Obama being the super scary smart guy he is, induced Netanyahu into another face to face merely so that he could lay on another national insult. A Lucy pulls the ball out from Charlie Brown moment as it were. Thats what we need all our allies to understand, the dependability of this administration.
        "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

        “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

        Comment

        Working...
        X