Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iranian students invade British territory

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Iranian students invade British territory

    Hundreds of Iranians storm British compound in Tehran over Gaza attacks
    Iranian protestors break into the British diplomatic residence known as 'Golhak Garden' in north Tehran

    (AFP/Getty)

    The security breach at the Tehran compound was unprecedented in recent years
    Michael Theodoulou

    Hundreds of Iranian radicals stormed the British compound in Tehran last night, replacing the Union flag with a Palestinian one in protest against Israel’s military offensive in the Gaza Strip.

    British officials will be assessing whether the security breach, unprecedented in recent years, was an isolated incident or presages further violent demonstrations.

    A hardline Iranian news agency said that protests against Britain and Egypt, whose embassy was also targeted, would continue.

    Hardline Iranian students have often staged noisy protests outside the British embassy in Tehran, hurling stones and petrol bombs at the building, but Tuesday night’s incident was the first time in decades that they have breached diplomatic territory.
    Related Links

    * Gaza: secondary war being fought on the internet

    * Israel rejects 48-hour ceasefire plan for Gaza

    * ANALYSIS: the options now for Israel

    Multimedia

    * Pictures: Tehran protests

    * Pictures: Gaza violence

    The Foreign Office confirmed Iranian media reports that demonstrators had “trespassed” onto the compound at Gulhak but said the situation had been resolved swiftly and all embassy staff were safe. Iranian police were reported to have intervened quickly to eject the radicals.

    British diplomats are maintaining a low-key public stance on the incident - which involved up to 300 people - in order to limit any repeat and robbing the Tehran regime of any satisfaction. But a strong behind-the-scenes protest from London is certain.

    The Gulhak compound is a lush and sprawling area several miles north of the historic British embassy in central Tehran. It provides accommodation for diplomats, houses the British Council, a school and a cemetery for the British dead from two world wars.

    Iran’s official news agency said: “A large group of people and students entered the Gulhak Gardens, which are occupied by the British embassy to protest at Britain’s policies in supporting the Zionist regime and put up the Palestinian flag there.”

    The demonstrators had torched the British, US and Israeli flags, other Iranian media reports said.

    There appears to be little doubt that the Iranian regime orchestrated or at least inspired the attack on Gulhak. Just days ago Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari, the commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, suggested his force should facilitate “revolutionary action” similar to the capture of the “Den of Spies” – the US embassy -- on November 4, 1979.

    The remarks, made in a speech to hardline university students from a large paramilitary vigilante organisation under his control, were seen as a thinly-veiled threat against the British embassy which has become of the main focus of ire against the West since the American embassy became defunct.

    Lambasting “perfidious Albion”, which is often perceived to the “little Satan” pulling America’s strings, is a common pastime in the Iranian media.

    Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, decreed on Sunday that anyone who died in the defence of Gaza would be deemed a martyr.

    Hardline student groups have been urging the Government to authorise volunteer suicide bombers to leave Iran and fight against Israel in response to events in Gaza. There has been no response from the Government. Similar calls have been made in the past but there is no record of any radical ever carrying out such an attack.

    There has been a history of political agitation by hardliners against Britain’s ownership of the Gulhak compound, with some calling for the prime chunk of verdant real estate to be reclaimed and turned into a public park and museum for “studying and fighting colonialism”.

    One radical insisted two years ago that if the British wanted to keep Gulhak – “a centre of corruption and conspiracy” -- then they “should exchange it for Hyde Park. The Iranian parliament declined his motion to debate the matter.

    ***************

    I hope Britain has the balls to do something about this.

    For that matter, if Iranians try to storm the US embassy again, I hope the US Marines have the balls to flip to full auto and open fire.
    Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
    Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

  • #2
    I don't think there is a US embassy.
    Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

    When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

    Comment


    • #3
      Good point. God I'm a dumbass sometimes.

      Point stands though. **** Iran, if Iranian students want to act like ****ing ignorant barbarians then they should be treated as such.
      Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
      Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Remember: Some of the former American hostages have identified Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as being among the students who held them hostages back during the Carter Administration. So it's not surprising that Iranians are again violating international law and the sovereign territory of another nation.

        Comment


        • #5
          If Carter was worth a **** we would have gone to war with Iran in 1979. The hostages were released on the first day of the Reagan Administration, ostensible to embarrass Carter. Another motive? Hmmm, could be....Reagan would have blown them to ****.
          Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
          Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by David Floyd
            If Carter was worth a **** we would have gone to war with Iran in 1979. The hostages were released on the first day of the Reagan Administration, ostensible to embarrass Carter. Another motive? Hmmm, could be....Reagan would have blown them to ****.
            How would you measure victory is such a war? The hostages would have been slaughtered. We kill a bunch of Iranian soldiers, maybe take Tehran, and then what?

            Comment


            • #7
              Perfidious Albion
              <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
              I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Zkribbler


                How would you measure victory is such a war? The hostages would have been slaughtered. We kill a bunch of Iranian soldiers, maybe take Tehran, and then what?
                We send a message to the Ayatollah that we value American lives equal to 100,000 Iranian lives, and will take appropriate payment for any hostages killed.
                <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                Comment


                • #9
                  **** Iran.
                  Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                  "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                  He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We send a message to the Ayatollah that we value American lives equal to 100,000 Iranian lives, and will take appropriate payment for any hostages killed.
                    Yep.

                    Also, we send a message that actions have consequences.
                    Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                    Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by David Floyd View Post
                      If Carter was worth a **** we would have gone to war with Iran in 1979. The hostages were released on the first day of the Reagan Administration, ostensible to embarrass Carter. Another motive? Hmmm, could be....Reagan would have blown them to ****.


                      Why go to war yourself when you can simply provoke a proxy war (cf. Iraq-Iran war of the '80s). It's cheaper, and you don't have to deal with all sorts of unpleasant externalities such as bodybags
                      "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
                      "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        One wonders where this stuff about an Embassy being part of the the diplomatic mission country's territory stuff came from?



                        Under international law, diplomatic missions enjoy an extraterritorial status and thus, although remaining part of the host country's territory, they are exempt from local law and in almost all respects treated as being part of the territory of the home country.
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                          One wonders where this stuff about an Embassy being part of the the diplomatic mission country's territory stuff came from?



                          Under international law, diplomatic missions enjoy an extraterritorial status and thus, although remaining part of the host country's territory, they are exempt from local law and in almost all respects treated as being part of the territory of the home country.
                          Probably from the bit bolded.
                          One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            That's a fair bit of self pwnage there Imran.
                            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
                              Probably from the bit bolded.
                              Exactly, while they are treated in most cases as being part of the home country, the diplomatic mission is actually technically part of the host country's territory. There is no territorial exchange involved when an embassy is created.

                              Therefore, invading an embassy is NOT invading the territory of the home country.
                              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X