Official Babe Thread VI

[MattBowron]

dp

[-Jrabbit]

It's just a moniker. They are supposed to exhibit "unconventional beauty" or some such thing. Which means lots of goth and punk chicks. They consider themselves a "lifestyle brand" -- which apparently means softcore porn that somehow empowers the women exhibiting themselves.

I'm certain self biased can provide an in-depth analysis.

[Thoth]

It's just a moniker. They are supposed to exhibit "unconventional beauty" or some such thing. Which means lots of goth and punk chicks. They consider themselves a "lifestyle brand" -- which apparently means softcore porn that somehow empowers the women exhibiting themselves.

I'm certain self biased can provide an in-depth analysis.

TLDR version:

It's all about smokin hot chicks with Mohawks.

[Al B. Sure!]

[Al B. Sure!]

Perfect lumbar curve in a squat position. Indicative of strong, well-developed glutes and hamstrings.

Is this specimen not medically sound, Dr. Guynemer?



No, of course not because half of you are weirdos

[Al B. Sure!]

Same woman... let's check development of the quadriceps femoris.



What is the muscle along the front of the thigh that contributes to that curve? The rectus femoris? Looks pretty well-developed to me.

No doubt a healthy specimen.



This stuff is objective. Beauty consists only in physical signals for musculoskeletal health and general health and virility. No such thing as beauty in the eye of the beholder.

And when assessing the health of a specimen, what is the largest region on the human body? The area which contributes significantly to all physical activity, especially that which would have been most relevant to our prehistoric ancestors? The area that is of great import to any physical/athletic training regimen? Yes, the hips, thighs, glutes, and lower back.

Very simple and straight-forward. Would you rather have a woman developed in those areas which would have been an asset in your prehistoric tribe or some rail-thin maybe big breasted woman with legs like toothpicks? Biologically the latter would have possessed an inefficient body type and should have been sexually selected against.

But apparently a lot of you have brains that are screwed up and your sexual selectors are all out of whack. Something is going on here.

[C0ckney]

This stuff is objective. Beauty consists only in physical signals for musculoskeletal health and general health and virility. No such thing as beauty in the eye of the beholder.

i can't for the life of me imagine why you're still a virgin...

[ricketyclik]

I basically agree with you Alby, except for the part about big breasts. Big breasts = good nutrition for your offspring.

[MikeH]

In a completely unrelated comment, homosexuals don't tend to find large breasts attractive.

[ricketyclik]

Of course, women's breasts engorge anyway shortly before birth, so maybe Alby's right about that too.

(I've been thinking about breasts for the last hour).

[MikeH]

True of most half hours I suspect?

[ricketyclik]

Nah, I mainly think about buttocks. I'm with Alby on that.

[Gibsie]

I basically agree with you Alby, except for the part about big breasts. Big breasts = good nutrition for your offspring.

I'm no midwife but babies don't actually eat the breasts themselves do they

[Docfeelgood]

Tons of fun!!!!!!!!

[ricketyclik]

No, it's normally grown men who attempt that.

(X-post to Gibsie)