Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First Real Star Trek Trailer (JJ Abrams' new version)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Elok
    Wow, whoever made it had waaaay too much free time. It was funny though, in a spectacularly sophomoric way.
    I have to think it was a group of 20-50 trekkies online who assigned a certain number of episodes per person. No individual has that much time...


    "I've been calling, why haven't you responded?!?"
    Last edited by Darius871; November 20, 2008, 11:58.
    Unbelievable!

    Comment


    • #32
      And think of a lot of those episodes that when they did beam down to the planet and it was just a rock.
      They were just being realistic
      "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by rah


        Gee, with the exeption of alien boobs that describes TOS.
        And TNG, and to a lesser extent DS9.

        Clearly, Zevico's only seen Enterprise, Voyager, and Revenge of the Sith.
        B♭3

        Comment


        • #34

          Naw no planet ever looked like that.

          One large perfectly flat area with one big fake rock directly behind where they beamed down too.
          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

          Comment


          • #35
            They were played on - but never realised. Star Fleet never had a point-to-point transporter, but rather a transporter-to-tranporter ...ehhr... transporter. Whenever they stepped on that platform they were secretely beamed into a film-studio - hence the fake rock (it was, after all, also a beaming platform, and they had to put the tech for it somewhere). You know, that trick has tradition...

            Same with Holo-deck BTW - sometimes it makes for a terrible effort to keep the crew happy. But you cant let them know it´s all real, cause then they wouldnt be able to enjoy the hookers so much... A happy crew is very important for the success of the mission...

            Comment


            • #36


              except for all the times where the tranporter had to be broken because it would screw up their clever plot if it there was such an actual thing.
              It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
              RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • #37
                chief engineers are let in on it... sometimes... if they happen to be blind... or fat... (what was wrong with the CE on voyager ? i never watched that really...)

                And the captains - usually the only ones smart enough to figure it out - are not allowed to leave the ship. How convinient, uh ? Incidentally, that directive was issued the same year, that Hollywood was rebuilt after the eugenic wars (which, of course, had started there). Wait ! Incident ? Well, you decide...
                Last edited by Unimatrix11; November 20, 2008, 13:25.

                Comment


                • #38
                  John Cho won't be Sulu unless he completely over enunciates every syllable.
                  If you look around and think everyone else is an *******, you're the *******.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    He's also not flamboyantly gay AFAICS.
                    Unbelievable!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I once read an essay somewhere online pointing out that everyone criticizing the scientific accuracy of Star Trek is misguided; large as the scientific errors are, they pale in comparison to the terrible incompetence of Star Trek engineering. Redundancy, simplicity, failsafes, kill-switches--the advanced engineers of the future haven't heard of a single one of 'em. The essay was by an engineer who, after watching the series, concluded that Starfleet engineering specifically designed the Enterprise to kill all its passengers.
                      1011 1100
                      Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Indeed. Even though the Technical Manual books they sell suggest that there are all of those redundancies and backups in place, it's clear that none of them work.

                        That's Socialist engineering for you. What with the Federation not having money anymore...
                        B♭3

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Starships are the conscripts of the future!
                          "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Elok
                            I once read an essay somewhere online pointing out that everyone criticizing the scientific accuracy of Star Trek is misguided; large as the scientific errors are, they pale in comparison to the terrible incompetence of Star Trek engineering. Redundancy, simplicity, failsafes, kill-switches--the advanced engineers of the future haven't heard of a single one of 'em. The essay was by an engineer who, after watching the series, concluded that Starfleet engineering specifically designed the Enterprise to kill all its passengers.
                            Just another example of people taking this WAY WAY TOO seriously. It was a darn TV SHOW FROM THE 60's.
                            If everything always works, half their plots would fall apart. The engineering was obviously not important and only mentioned when Scotty or Spock needed to fill in a few empty minutes and it played a part of the plot.

                            It's comments like that that make me really whant this new movie to be a reboot just so we can listen to the fanboys whine like stuck pigs. IT"S ENTERTAINMENT, not HISTORY.

                            NOTE: I'm a big fan of the original series.
                            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I liked the new trailer, and I loved watching this since I was a kid until I was a young teenager.
                              You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by rah


                                Just another example of people taking this WAY WAY TOO seriously. It was a darn TV SHOW FROM THE 60's.
                                If everything always works, half their plots would fall apart. The engineering was obviously not important and only mentioned when Scotty or Spock needed to fill in a few empty minutes and it played a part of the plot.

                                It's comments like that that make me really whant this new movie to be a reboot just so we can listen to the fanboys whine like stuck pigs. IT"S ENTERTAINMENT, not HISTORY.

                                NOTE: I'm a big fan of the original series.
                                What's your favorite episode?

                                While I'll admit "Amok Time" isn't the best, it has a soft spot in my heart because that's one of the first ones I remember seeing.
                                B♭3

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X