Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama's Real Opposition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama's Real Opposition

    from the wall street journal

    Obama's Real Opposition
    Presidents come and go; Congressional barons are forever.


    Now that Barack Obama has vanquished John McCain, he faces a much greater foe: Democrats on Capitol Hill. They've humbled the last two Democratic Presidents -- and with their enhanced majorities next year, they'll be out to do it again.


    Mr. Obama may appreciate the threat, because yesterday he offered Clinton White House veteran Rahm Emanuel a job as his chief of staff. But even that savvy, relatively sane liberal will have difficulties grappling with the fearsome committee chairmen and liberal interest groups that did so much to sabotage Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. Meet the President-elect's real opposition:

    David Obey. The Appropriations Chairman wants to slash defense spending as a money grab for more social programs and entitlements. Fellow spender Barney Frank recently added that a military budget cut of 25% was about right. A military crash diet wouldn't leave the funds for the surge in Afghanistan that Mr. Obama advocates, and it's a sure way to hand the national security issue back to the GOP.

    Chuck Schumer. The Senate Democrat and his friends are already threatening banks if they don't lend more money instantly under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Other political masters want to use Tarp to nationalize large swaths of U.S. industry such as the Detroit auto makers or to bail out states like New York that are in debt. If Mr. Obama doesn't want to have to pass a Tarp II, he'll have to say no.

    George Miller. Some Democrats are starting to target the tax subsidies for 401(k)s and other private retirement options. Mr. Miller, who heads the House Education and Labor Committee, calls them "a big failure" and recently held a hearing to ponder alternatives, including nationalizing pensions and replacing them with special bonds administered by Social Security. The proposal has also caught the eye of Jim McDermott, who chairs the relevant Ways and Means subcommittee. Mr. Obama won big with his promise of tax cuts for the middle class, which doesn't square with attacks on middle-class nest eggs.

    John Conyers. The man running House Judiciary is cheerleading the Europeans who want to indict Bush officials for war crimes. Other Democrats are thinking about hearings and other show trials. This is far from the postpartisan reconciliation that Mr. Obama preaches.

    Henry Waxman. With President Bush soon to be out of office, the Californian's team of Inspector Clouseaus at House Oversight won't have any "scandals" left to pursue. The word in Washington is that Mr. Waxman is looking to unseat John Dingell as Chairman of Energy and Commerce, in order to shove aside a global warming moderate. That could pave the way for huge new energy taxes. Voters will punish Mr. Obama if they get hammered every time they fill up the gas tank or buy groceries.

    Pete Stark. The Chairman of a crucial House subcommittee dealing with health care doesn't think Mr. Obama's proposal to significantly federalize the insurance market goes far enough. He wants a single-payer system like Canada's. Mr. Obama may want to strike a deal with Senate Republicans on health care, but Mr. Stark will be pulling him left at every turn.

    All of these feudal lords -- and many others -- also come with their own private armies: the interest groups that compose the money and manpower of today's Democratic Party. The American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Watch and others on the anti-antiterror left want Mr. Obama to limit the surveillance and other tools that have prevented another terrorist attack on U.S. soil. The Natural Resources Defense Council and Environmental Defense will insist on onerous caps -- that is, taxes -- on coal and other carbon energy. Those won't help Mr. Obama carry Ohio and Indiana again in four years.

    The trial bar wants an end to arbitration in disputes in return on its Senate investment, while the National Education Association will try to gut No Child Left Behind accountability standards. And organized labor will insist on a major push to pass "card check," which would end secret-ballot elections for unions. If Mr. Obama wants to mobilize the business community against him while squeezing moderate Democrats, he'll go along with that right from the start.

    While many voters may think they've voted for "change" in Mr. Obama, they also handed power to the oldest forces in the Old Democratic Party. Jimmy Carter campaigned as a moderate and outsider, but Congressional liberals quickly ran his budget director, the economic centrist Bert Lance, out of town. Then they overrode Mr. Carter's veto of a pork-barrel water bill. Mr. Carter referred to the tax committees as "ravenous wolves" after they transformed his tax reform into a special-interest bouquet. Next came Reagan.

    Bill Clinton also campaigned as a moderate, but in his first two years he was unable to govern as Congress pursued liberal priorities, including a big boost in taxes and spending. Recall Roberta Achtenberg as the scourge of the Boy Scouts and Joycelyn Elders calling for the legalization of drugs? Mr. Clinton chose -- or was forced -- to take up gun control and HillaryCare before welfare reform. Next came Newt Gingrich.

    Maybe Mr. Obama has absorbed these lessons, but even if he has he'll have to be tough. The Great Society liberals who dominate Congress are old men in a hurry, and they'll run over the 47-year-old neophyte if he lets them.

  • #2
    While this op-ed is a bit over the top (it is the WSJ's ed page after all), it makes a very good point that the leaders in Congress aren't exactly interested all that much in what President-elect Obama wants to do and rather want to push what they want to do.
    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

    Comment


    • #3
      Funny thing is, I think Obama is going to need the Repugs before this is over. They are more centrist.
      Long time member @ Apolyton
      Civilization player since the dawn of time

      Comment


      • #4
        I suppose the biggest flaw in the OP's analogy is that neither Carter nor Clinton had as big of a mandate as Obama does, so it would behoove Congressional Democrats to play ball with him for a while. Not sure how long that'll last though.
        Unbelievable!

        Comment


        • #5
          That's probably just as well since a lot of Obama's ideas suck.
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Darius871
            I suppose the biggest flaw in the OP's analogy is that neither Carter nor Clinton had as big of a mandate as Obama does, so it would behoove Congressional Democrats to play ball with him for a while. Not sure how long that'll last though.
            Didn't he get like 52% of the popular vote? That's no mandate.
            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

            Comment


            • #7
              Why would Obama be at loggerheads with Congressional Dems now when he was voting with them on everything while he was in the Senate?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Darius871
                I suppose the biggest flaw in the OP's analogy is that neither Carter nor Clinton had as big of a mandate as Obama does, so it would behoove Congressional Democrats to play ball with him for a while. Not sure how long that'll last though.
                You think the Congress cares about that? Hell, with their gains, they probably think it's a Democrat mandate rather than an Obama one (and I'm serious about that.. Congresspeople be delusional).
                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kidicious


                  Didn't he get like 52% of the popular vote? That's no mandate.
                  A mandate is that which is perceived as a mandate. In 1980, Reagan was perceived as having received a mandate although only 25% of registered voters voted for him. (Lots of folks stayed home that year.)

                  Barack is perceived as having received a national mandate. None of these committee overlords can make the same claim. Our new Prez will be able to move them.

                  But Obama has also signalled his willingness to work with others. If some chairman says, "I don't like your plan; my plan will work better," and Barack thinks the alternative plan is helpful, he'll be willing to go with it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Obama ran from the left to beat Hillary and the center to beat McCain. We're assuming, and so is the article, that he isn't left of Pelosi. We'll just have to see.
                    Long time member @ Apolyton
                    Civilization player since the dawn of time

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Zkribbler


                      A mandate is that which is perceived as a mandate. In 1980, Reagan was perceived as having received a mandate although only 25% of registered voters voted for him. (Lots of folks stayed home that year.)

                      Barack is perceived as having received a national mandate. None of these committee overlords can make the same claim. Our new Prez will be able to move them.

                      But Obama has also signalled his willingness to work with others. If some chairman says, "I don't like your plan; my plan will work better," and Barack thinks the alternative plan is helpful, he'll be willing to go with it.
                      The next question is a mandate for exactly what? Why did people elect him anyway, just because he's not Bush? I don't see how he has mandate to do anything in particular.
                      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The real fight might be with the upper Congressional leadership. Both Pelosi and Reid have been partisan warriors. Obama has indicated he wants to reach across the aisle. Will Pelosi and Reid be willing and able to play that game?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Kidicious


                          The next question is a mandate for exactly what? Why did people elect him anyway, just because he's not Bush? I don't see how he has mandate to do anything in particular.
                          How 'bout:
                          Middle-class tax cut.
                          Re-regulate the financial sector.
                          Rescue homeowners from foreclosure.
                          End the lobbyist-oversight revolving door.
                          Develop alternative energy.
                          Institute universal healtcare.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            mob rule "mandates"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Kid does have a point in that we don't really know if the people elected him because he's not Bush rather than for his policies.

                              We'll find out during the administration, but Obama has to be sure not to overreach. After all, Clinton thought he had a mandate for national health care and then got destroyed on it.
                              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X