Originally posted by Jon Miller
I argue that two drunk people should get charged (not put on sex offender lists or face prison time, community service is fine) for having sex with eachother.
Just like two kids.
I argue that two drunk people should get charged (not put on sex offender lists or face prison time, community service is fine) for having sex with eachother.
Just like two kids.
Drunk people are incapable of giving consent. Just like kids. Or retarded people.
You cannot really be saying that mentally retarded people should be legally prevented from ever having sex???
This is fascist.
I agree that it takes a lot of drunk to get to that level (I have been there, I no longer get there, thankfully no one took advantage of me).
I am not saying that the state should go out looking for drunk people and charging both. It just isn't reasonable without a big invasion of privacy.
I am not saying that the state should go out looking for drunk people and charging both. It just isn't reasonable without a big invasion of privacy.
However, if one person is charging another with rape, and they were both drunk. Then both should get the same response as if they statutory raped each other now.
There is a pretty high threshold for proving rape, which is as it should be. If it's a case of two equally drunk people complaining after the fact, then they're equally responsible for their own "plights" they should just get shooed out of court and not waste its time.
Similarly, if only one was drunk (the accuser), then the accused should get statutory rape charged.
And face it, ethically John's are responsible for the conditions the prostitue is in. If she is a sex slave then the John is party to that. If she is being forced, then the John is party to that, even if he didn't physically force her himself.
I think two consenting adults should be allowed to have sex with each other for whatever reason they choose, and it's nobody else's business why they do it.
Comment