Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The War on Intellectualism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The War on Intellectualism

    From http://www.bilerico.com/2008/10/the_...lectualism.php

    This seems very apropos for a country which could elect Bush junior, and consider Sarah Palin.

    It seems there is a new threat to our country- an insidious danger that is seeping into our homes and everyday lives that must be stopped at any cost. That threat is intellectualism.

    We have heard the some of the buzzwords of this political season- Folksy, Joe Six-pack, Elitist, and Arugula Eating. It seems the new "culture war" or wedge issue is intelligence. The Vice-Presidential debate only solidified the lines in this war. On one side, you had Palin- full of "folksy charm" and "you betcha" language. Then you had Biden, who had a command of the issues, but was called "boring" and (gasp!) "professorial" by the pundits.

    Is this the point we have come to in our country? Do we really think that having knowledge about an issue is a liability? Have we learned nothing from the past eight years about voting for the person you "want to have a beer with"? Is being smart or intellectually curious a bad thing?

    It seems the war is on and the Republicans have launched another surge strategy.

    I have been absolutely dumbfounded as I have watched the level of discourse (and the ensuing media coverage) in this political season. There has always been a level of "east coast intellectual" bashing from the right, but this cycle it has been raised to a completely new level.

    We have seen McCain release vapid attack ad after attack ad about "celebrity", all the while being devoid of any facts or issues. We have seen Palin stumble through interviews, to the point of not even being able to name any newspapers she reads (very reminiscent of George W Bush, who famously said he doesn't read). The media even praised Palin in the debate for being "down to earth" and a "breath of fresh air."

    How is dumbing down our country a breath of fresh air? Lowering the discourse to these levels (Paris Hilton, hockey moms, and lipstick- oh my!) has been staggering and disheartening to watch.

    The war has not only been waged by promoting the "Joe Six-pack" quality (a term that makes my skin crawl and sounds incredibly offensive) of McCain and Palin, however. They GOP has taken to throwing around charges of elitism, arugula eating, latte and martini drinking to show how Obama and Biden- and by extension all Democrats- are "out of touch" with "real" Americans. It's an amazing argument- by being too smart and thoughtful on issues, they just don't understand anything. Want proof? They eat fancy salad and drink coffee.

    It is also constantly being said that both Obama and Biden are too "professorial", as if being an intelligent leader is a weakness. Professors are people who KNOW THINGS and can lead and teach others. How is that an insult? They simply know too much to be the leaders of the free world? All those pesky details floating around in their heads makes it impossible for them to lead? Huh?

    How did we get here? I certainly don't want just any old Average Joe to lead our country. I want someone who knows facts and issues. And if they don't know something, I want someone with the intellectual curiosity to learn and find out! Pick up a newspaper, get online, and surround yourself with other intelligent people. Yet McCain can't use the internet and Palin can't name a paper she reads. Where is the intellectualism to be a true leader in this time of trouble in our country?

    Let me be clear- I don't care if politicians don't seem "fun" or "folksy"- I don't want to have a beer with them. I want them to lead. "Going with your gut" is not a viable option for this level of leadership. Quick sound bites or catch phrases don't make you a good leader. I don't care if you can hunt, were in the PTA, or wink at me- I want you to be educated about the issues facing our country.

    Intellectualism is a quality we want in a leader. I would rather have someone who might be a bit dry and heavy on the facts than someone who is folksy and dead wrong any day.

    But hey, what do I know? Maybe I'll just stick to eating my elitist arugula salad and reading.

    http://www.hardware-wiki.com - A wiki about computers, with focus on Linux support.

  • #2
    This is one of the primary reasons I'm voting Democrat this year.
    "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
    "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

    Comment


    • #3
      Stupid people vote.
      “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
      "Capitalism ho!"

      Comment


      • #4
        "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
        "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by DaShi
          Stupid people vote.
          There are stupid people in Denmark too, but we don't have that problem on the same scale as you. Being stupid does not have to mean that you believe being stupid is good, and vote for other stupid people.
          http://www.hardware-wiki.com - A wiki about computers, with focus on Linux support.

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm sorry but I don't think intellectualism has anything to do with leadership.

            Leadership is knowing on whose advice to rely on and what step to take, even if it's on popular. Basically, it's like bush said - it's all about taking decisions. This calls for guts, political know how, common sense, decensy.

            Great leaders are often called "wise" for the choises they make, but they aren't always intellectuals. This is a fairy tale invented by "The West Wing" where the president always knew every little detail and would spend hours pouring meaningless statistics on his staff.

            He does not need to be the smartest or most educated.
            A leader has a staff and professional advisors that prepare background facts, policy advice, think tanks and what not.

            The leader's role is to have just enough intellect to understand the problems he's facing, alot of courage to make the right, often unpopular decisions, and enough political know how to see the through.

            That does not equate with being an expert in foreign affars, economy and what not.

            Comment


            • #7
              smart > dumb

              While what Siro says is true, smart is still > dumb. Smart is certainly not < dumb.

              Comment


              • #8
                There also seems to be a lot of fundamentalism on all kinds of issues in the US. I define fundamentalism as a strongly held opinion not based on facts, reasoning or evidence.

                For example, current Republicans have a strong fundamentalist belief that tax cuts are the solution for all economic problems. This belief is not backed by actual economists, but seems to have been passed on to them by their messiah, Reagan...

                IMO there is a connection between the US acceptance of religion and the (low) quality of debate in politics. The anti-science attitude which is necessary to accept religion (virgin birth, anti-evolution, etc) seems to have carried over to normal politics, where it suddenly is ok to think that tax cuts are the solution to everything without actually checking with current economic science.
                Last edited by Thue; October 4, 2008, 17:57.
                http://www.hardware-wiki.com - A wiki about computers, with focus on Linux support.

                Comment


                • #9
                  And the fundamentalist belief of deregulation... The fact that Palin for one calls for deregulation in the height of the financial crisis is mind-blowing. Those business banks have been juggling money around for years without any responsability, stacking up the enormous profits for several decades while leaving the problems to the state. Well now, that certainly calls for deregulation



                  Originally posted by Sirotnikov
                  I'm sorry but I don't think intellectualism has anything to do with leadership.

                  Leadership is knowing on whose advice to rely on and what step to take, even if it's on popular. Basically, it's like bush said - it's all about taking decisions. This calls for guts, political know how, common sense, decensy.

                  Great leaders are often called "wise" for the choises they make, but they aren't always intellectuals. This is a fairy tale invented by "The West Wing" where the president always knew every little detail and would spend hours pouring meaningless statistics on his staff.

                  He does not need to be the smartest or most educated.
                  A leader has a staff and professional advisors that prepare background facts, policy advice, think tanks and what not.

                  The leader's role is to have just enough intellect to understand the problems he's facing, alot of courage to make the right, often unpopular decisions, and enough political know how to see the through.

                  That does not equate with being an expert in foreign affars, economy and what not.
                  I beg to disagree. Being intellectual often is part of leadership. A leader can be intellectual and be able to make decisions simultaneously, especially if those decisions are unpopular (they're intellectuals with a lot of factual knowledge remember ).

                  If a leader merely needs enough intellectual capacity to understand the right choices, then there are many potential presidents walking around the globe... I want the best of the ****ing best out there. People with enough background, intellectual and experiencewise, so they can make the best decisions.

                  If you're not intelligent enough yourself you have to rely too much on advisors who can manipulate you and who can have their own agenda, cf. G. Bush Jr. who surrounded himself with a truckload of neocons who succesfully hacked his rule.

                  Your opinion is baffling. Honestly...
                  "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
                  "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Aeson
                    smart > dumb

                    While what Siro says is true, smart is still > dumb. Smart is certainly not < dumb.
                    i can't believe i'm saying this, since i usually also prefer smarter people but:

                    intellectual != smart.
                    non-intellectual != dumb.

                    intellectuals can be biased, or can partake in the dumbest theories that are popular in their circle.

                    think about the wonderful intellectuals that dreamt of a socialist utopia. think of the excellent intellectuals who only rely on the invisble hand.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Sirotnikov


                      i can't believe i'm saying this, since i usually also prefer smarter people but:

                      intellectual != smart.
                      non-intellectual != dumb.

                      intellectuals can be biased, or can partake in the dumbest theories that are popular in their circle.

                      think about the wonderful intellectuals that dreamt of a socialist utopia. think of the excellent intellectuals who only rely on the invisble hand.
                      "You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran

                      Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In Dutch intellectual means someone with a rational scientific attitude. My guess is that these people are quite smart.

                        Everyone has a bias, but intellectuals, with their ability to rationally think about an issue with clear method, have a better opinion in my book than some Joe Sixpack Prez making gut feeling decisions.

                        my 2 cents tho
                        "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
                        "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It seems there is a new threat to our country


                          New threat? New?

                          One may want to check out the 1952 and 1956 elections (among others) if they think this is a "new" threat.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Sirotnikov



                            intellectuals can be biased, or can partake in the dumbest theories that are popular in their circle.

                            think about the wonderful intellectuals that dreamt of a socialist utopia. think of the excellent intellectuals who only rely on the invisble hand.
                            Joe Sixpacks can be biased, or can partake in the dumbest theories that are popular in their circle.

                            think about the wonderful idealists that dreamt of a democratic Iraq. think of the excellent Republicans who only rely on casino-capitalism.


                            Your words are hollow.
                            "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
                            "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think you are making Siro's point for him (ie, wisdom and intellectualism isn't necessarily the same thing)
                              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X