Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bailout Bonanza

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Here's a better one written in March.


    Derivatives the new 'ticking bomb'

    PAUL B. FARRELL
    Derivatives the new 'ticking bomb'
    Buffett and Gross warn: $516 trillion bubble is a disaster waiting to happen
    By Paul B. Farrell, MarketWatch
    Last update: 7:31 p.m. EDT March 10, 2008ARROYO GRANDE, Calif. (MarketWatch) -- "Charlie and I believe Berkshire should be a fortress of financial strength" wrote Warren Buffett. That was five years before the subprime-credit meltdown.
    "We try to be alert to any sort of mega-catastrophe risk, and that posture may make us unduly appreciative about the burgeoning quantities of long-term derivatives contracts and the massive amount of uncollateralized receivables that are growing alongside. In our view, however, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal."

    That warning was in Buffett's 2002 letter to Berkshire shareholders. He saw a future that many others chose to ignore. The Iraq war build-up was at a fever-pitch. The imagery of WMDs and a mushroom cloud fresh in his mind.
    Also fresh on Buffett's mind: His acquisition of General Re four years earlier, about the time the Long-Term Capital Management hedge fund almost killed the global monetary system. How? This is crucial: LTCM nearly killed the system with a relatively small $5 billion trading loss. Peanuts compared with the hundreds of billions of dollars of subprime-credit write-offs now making Wall Street's big shots look like amateurs.
    Buffett tried to sell off Gen Re's derivatives group. No buyers. Unwinding it was costly, but led to his warning that derivatives are a "financial weapon of mass destruction." That was 2002.
    Derivatives bubble explodes five times bigger in five years
    Wall Street didn't listen to Buffett. Derivatives grew into a massive bubble, from about $100 trillion to $516 trillion by 2007. The new derivatives bubble was fueled by five key economic and political trends:
    Sarbanes-Oxley increased corporate disclosures and government oversight
    Federal Reserve's cheap money policies created the subprime-housing boom
    War budgets burdened the U.S. Treasury and future entitlements programs
    Trade deficits with China and others destroyed the value of the U.S. dollar
    Oil and commodity rich nations demanding equity payments rather than debt
    In short, despite Buffett's clear warnings, a massive new derivatives bubble is driving the domestic and global economies, a bubble that continues growing today parallel with the subprime-credit meltdown triggering a bear-recession.
    Data on the five-fold growth of derivatives to $516 trillion in five years comes from the most recent survey by the Bank of International Settlements, the world's clearinghouse for central banks in Basel, Switzerland. The BIS is like the cashier's window at a racetrack or casino, where you'd place a bet or cash in chips, except on a massive scale: BIS is where the U.S. settles trade imbalances with Saudi Arabia for all that oil we guzzle and gives China IOUs for the tainted drugs and lead-based toys we buy.
    To grasp how significant this five-fold bubble increase is, let's put that $516 trillion in the context of some other domestic and international monetary data:
    U.S. annual gross domestic product is about $15 trillion
    U.S. money supply is also about $15 trillion
    Current proposed U.S. federal budget is $3 trillion
    U.S. government's maximum legal debt is $9 trillion
    U.S. mutual fund companies manage about $12 trillion
    World's GDPs for all nations is approximately $50 trillion
    Unfunded Social Security and Medicare benefits $50 trillion to $65 trillion
    Total value of the world's real estate is estimated at about $75 trillion
    Total value of world's stock and bond markets is more than $100 trillion
    BIS valuation of world's derivatives back in 2002 was about $100 trillion
    BIS 2007 valuation of the world's derivatives is now a whopping $516 trillion
    Moreover, the folks at BIS tell me their estimate of $516 trillion only includes "transactions in which a major private dealer (bank) is involved on at least one side of the transaction," but doesn't include private deals between two "non-reporting entities." They did, however, add that their reporting central banks estimate that the coverage of the survey is around 95% on average.
    Also, keep in mind that while the $516 trillion "notional" value (maximum in case of a meltdown) of the deals is a good measure of the market's size, the 2007 BIS study notes that the $11 trillion "gross market values provides a more accurate measure of the scale of financial risk transfer taking place in derivatives markets."
    Bubbles, domino effects and the 'bad 2%'
    However, while that may be true as far as the parties to an individual deal, there are broader risks to the world's economies. Remember back in 1998 when LTCM's little $5 billion loss nearly brought down the world's banking system. That "domino effect" is now repeating many times over, straining the world's monetary, economic and political system as the subprime housing mess metastasizes, taking the U.S. stock market and the world economy down with it.
    This cascading "domino effect" was brilliantly described in "The $300 Trillion Time Bomb: If Buffett can't figure out derivatives, can anybody?" published early last year in Portfolio magazine, a couple months before the subprime meltdown. Columnist Jesse Eisinger's $300 trillion figure came from an earlier study of the derivatives market as it was growing from $100 trillion to $516 trillion over five years. Eisinger concluded:
    "There's nothing intrinsically scary about derivatives, except when the bad 2% blow up." Unfortunately, that "bad 2%" did blow up a few months afterwards, even as Bernanke and Paulson were assuring America that the subprime mess was "contained."
    Bottom line: Little things leverage a heck of a big wallop. It only takes a little spark from a "bad 2% deal" to ignite this $516 trillion weapon of mass destruction. Think of this entire unregulated derivatives market like an unsecured, unpredictable nuclear bomb in a Pakistan stockpile. It's only a matter of time.
    World's newest and biggest 'black market'
    The fact is, derivatives have become the world's biggest "black market," exceeding the illicit traffic in stuff like arms, drugs, alcohol, gambling, cigarettes, stolen art and pirated movies. Why? Because like all black markets, derivatives are a perfect way of getting rich while avoiding taxes and government regulations. And in today's slowdown, plus a volatile global market, Wall Street knows derivatives remain a lucrative business.
    Recently Pimco's bond fund king Bill Gross said "What we are witnessing is essentially the breakdown of our modern-day banking system, a complex of leveraged lending so hard to understand that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke required a face-to-face refresher course from hedge fund managers in mid-August." In short, not only Warren Buffett, but Bond King Bill Gross, our Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, the Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and the rest of America's leaders can't "figure out" the world's $516 trillion derivatives.
    Why? Gross says we are creating a new "shadow banking system." Derivatives are now not just risk management tools. As Gross and others see it, the real problem is that derivatives are now a new way of creating money outside the normal central bank liquidity rules. How? Because they're private contracts between two companies or institutions.
    BIS is primarily a records-keeper, a toothless tiger that merely collects data giving a legitimacy and false sense of security to this chaotic "shadow banking system" that has become the world's biggest "black market."
    That's crucial, folks. Why? Because central banks require reserves like stock brokers require margins, something backing up the transaction. Derivatives don't. They're not "real money." They're paper promises closer to "Monopoly" money than real U.S. dollars.
    And it takes place outside normal business channels, out there in the "free market." That's the wonderful world of derivatives, and it's creating a massive bubble that could soon implode.
    Comments? Yes, we want to hear your thoughts. Tell us what you think about derivatives: as "financial weapons of mass destruction;" as a "shadow banking system;" as a "black market;" as the next big bubble dangerously exposing us to that unpredictable "bad 2%."
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Unimatrix11
      DanS - call me arrogant, but i dont have to look at the details to know that this is just one giant rip-off.


      You're not arrogant, just stupid. Even if you're right about it being a ripoff, a statement like that just shows that you are an idiot.

      Comment


      • Some more details are trickling out about the recapitalizaton. Contrary to what I stated above...

        Participating banks. . . will need to give the Treasury warrants for an amount equal to 15 percent of the senior preferred investment, with a strike price determined by the bank's share price at the time of issuance.


        Slightly better, but still too lucrative for my tastes.
        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Kidicious


          The so called economist that they quoted is actually a conspiracy theorist.
          I got it from Mobius... I knew I should have checked it out more.

          JM
          Jon Miller-
          I AM.CANADIAN
          GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Ben Kenobi

            Obviously only conservative ideas are diseased, and if we were to abandon all of them society would improve, people would be wealthy and more prosperous, and no one would ever doubt their truth.
            Yes.

            What's your point?
            Only feebs vote.

            Comment


            • Just seems like an interesting example of how far-reaching the impact of the credit-crunch is:

              Ship Rates Plunge as Credit Freeze Strands Cargo, Demand Slumps

              By Alaric Nightingale and Chan Sue Ling

              Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Commodity shipping rates plunged to the lowest in more than five years as a lack of trade finance left cargoes stranded and the global economic slowdown limited raw material demand.

              Traders are finding it harder to get letters of credit that guarantee payments for goods, shipping executives said. Together with a slowdown in trade, that has contributed to this year's 82 percent drop in shipping costs for grain, coal and other commodities. Rates are so low that Zodiac Maritime Agencies Ltd., the line managed by Israel's billionaire Ofer family, announced today it may idle 20 of its largest ships.

              ``Letters of credit and the credit lines for trade currently are frozen,'' Khalid Hashim, managing director of Precious Shipping Pcl, Thailand's second-largest shipping company, said in Singapore yesterday. ``Nothing is moving because the trader doesn't want to take the risk of putting cargo on the boat and finding that nobody can pay.''

              The Baltic Dry Index fell 11 percent today to 1,615, the lowest since February 2003. Rates for larger ships of the type Zodiac intends to idle fell 17 percent today, taking this year's plunge to 85 percent, according to the London-based Baltic Exchange.

              Banks are leery of financing commodities and shipping transactions. Rio Tinto Group, the world's second-largest aluminum producer, may delay the planned sale of $10 billion of assets and Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. shelved its $2.6 billion purchase of Asarco LLC. Ship owners can't find cash to finance the construction of new ships.

              Oil, Metals

              Crude oil, industrial metals and grains have all slumped since reaching records in July on concern the worst financial crisis since the 1930s will cause a global recession. The Standard & Poor's Goldman Sachs Commodity Index has dropped 45 percent from its all-time high of 890.28 on July 3.

              ``Our customers are facing hard challenges,'' Isabella Loh, chief executive officer of Shell Marine Products, a unit of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, said at a conference in Singapore today. ``The credit crunch has affected liquidity and is having an impact on shipyards with cancellations and postponed orders, and expansion may be on hold.''

              Precious Shipping took as long as 15 months to secure financing for the 18 vessels it has on order, Hashim said. American Shipping Co. ASA can't get financing for two shuttle tankers that are part of its program to build 12 vessels.

              Timetable Review

              Rio said today it's reviewing its spending timetable and project costs. Sterlite, a unit of London-based Vedanta Resources Plc, told bankrupt U.S. copper producer Asarco to cut its price by ``hundreds of millions'' of dollars.

              Rio Tinto's share price fell as much as 18 percent to 2,334 percent in London trading today.

              ``Acquirers will find it harder to source funds and even if they can source funds, they'll have to pay more,'' said Steve Robinson, a senior investment manager with Alleron Investment Management in Sydney, which manages A$1.2 billion ($839 million). ``Given what's happened with commodity markets, they may not find buyers prepared to pay a premium.''

              Zodiac will instruct the captains of its capesize vessels, which typically carry iron ore and coal, to deliver their current cargoes and then weigh anchor, said two hedge fund managers who saw an e-mail from the company outlining the plan.

              The credit crisis may prompt a wave of ``consolidation'' in the shipping industry, Clyde Michael Bandy, chief executive officer of Chemoil Energy Ltd., said at the conference in Singapore.
              DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

              Comment


              • Indications are that the crunch in the commercial paper market may be easing. The yield on the 3-month Treasury is now 0.76%, up from 0.32% yesterday.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • Korea is getting hit now. It'll be interesting to see whether Japan and China will remained (largely) unaffected.
                  DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

                  Comment


                  • What assurances do we have that banks who receive this capital injection will actually start loaning again instead of just hording the money out of fear as has been occurring? We should have pushed for voting shares just as the Swedes did and as the British are now doing. That way we could influence policy encase the banks don't actually do what they're supposed to do with this money.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • There was something in the paper this morning about the bailout causing mortgage rates to go up already.

                      We don't need to borrow money. We need higher incomes. I think this bailout will make things worse.
                      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Oerdin
                        What assurances do we have that banks who receive this capital injection will actually start loaning again instead of just hording the money out of fear as has been occurring? We should have pushed for voting shares just as the Swedes did and as the British are now doing. That way we could influence policy encase the banks don't actually do what they're supposed to do with this money.
                        Yeah, that's exactly what we want. The government to run the banking industry in this country. What, you think if the government has voting shares its going to stop with telling the banks to lend out the capital injection money? I have a feeling the government will want say into who is being lent to. Hell, they probably will even without voting shares.

                        Why don't we just create a Bank of the US instead in that case?
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • I think its a legitimate concern that government owned banks could use their lending power for politically motivated lending, but of course the bailout money itself is already already showing signs of being handed out politically and their have long been concerns that the private banking sector has its own bias as well.

                          On the other hand we already have long established practices in which government explicitly favors certain activity by providing better then market loans, for example collage loans. Only the most extreme libertarians would argue that government has no right to steer social policy by these means.

                          The danger is when broad sector wide policy 'winner picking' gets confused or equated with narrow crony 'winner picking'. The former is a legitimate use of government power to steer society along some path chosen by the electorate, the later is a moral hazard that promotes corruption and reduces economic efficiency. Thus any lending power (and in general any government power) should be codified in such a way that individual government officials are not able to inject personal bias into the decisions of their office.

                          If we want to have government backed lending for social policy then I think such banks should be established with narrowly written charters that bind them to that specific goal. Such banks could be for profit or non-profit and could have a minority of private share holders. Government appointed regulators would represent the government owned shares on the board of directors and see to the bank fulfilling the terms of its charter. And lastly such banks should never be created as monopolies, rather they should always be created in groups to promote internal competition and reduce the chances that any single one would become 'too big to fail', appropriate size distributions would be maintained by splitting which would be mandated by the charters.
                          Companions the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators, the creator seeks - those who write new values on new tablets. Companions the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest. - Thus spoke Zarathustra, Fredrick Nietzsche

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                            Why don't we just create a Bank of the US instead in that case?
                            ... or this case?

                            (It's not a great idea, but it's better than propping up failed institutions that are holding the economy hostage. If we're going to prop up failed institutions, it might as well be our government we're propping up. Cut out the middle-man.)

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Oerdin
                              What assurances do we have that banks who receive this capital injection will actually start loaning again instead of just hording the money out of fear as has been occurring? We should have pushed for voting shares just as the Swedes did and as the British are now doing. That way we could influence policy encase the banks don't actually do what they're supposed to do with this money.
                              They could have simply made the banks recieving funds lend the money out as a requirement for the bailout. But the purpose of the bailout wasn't to get the credit markets moving. It was just to keep the doors open in the banks. Indeed, the banks will not loan out a large part of the funds that the're recieving. If they could do loan out all of it, they wouldn't need a bailout.

                              So the government is sucking up liquidity from the economy, and putting it in banks where it will sit, and it's keeing interest rates up.

                              That's why the bailout is going to push us deeper into recession. It was sold as an economic recovery package, but it will only save the banks.
                              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Impaler[WrG]
                                On the other hand we already have long established practices in which government explicitly favors certain activity by providing better then market loans, for example collage loans. Only the most extreme libertarians would argue that government has no right to steer social policy by these means.
                                I don't agree with any of these government favors, and I'm no extreme libertarian.
                                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X