Bolivian Agressors Expel American Ambassador

[Solomwi]

Originally posted by GePap


Your ignoring the Bush rule. If the Bush administration is doing it, it is more likely to be wrong that right.

Do we really want to be around when the Bush Rule collides with the Kidicious Corollary?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Solomwi

Do we really want to be around when the Bush Rule collides with the Kidicious Corollary?

Since I can't recall the last time I agreed with something the Bush administration has done....


Like I said, I'm against bad things, not good things.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by rmsharpe
I thought you communists were for self-determination... so why is it you have such a hard-on for Bolivia?

I'm for self-determination of the oppressed, not the oppressors and thieves.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Dauphin


The question that I asked to garner that response is what makes that quote scarier.

What was it? I'll add it in.

[Dauphin]

I don't have the exact quote, I can't find the thread either, but as far as I recall it was a thread about FARC and supposed ex-IRA member support. I asked a question to the effect of 'So you supported the IRA killing people in London?'.

[Dr Strangelove]

Since the army supports the goverment then this uprising probably won't last long. It looks like the ambassador should have been talking to the generals instead of the govenors.

How many generals could Bolivia have anyway?

[Lancer]

Those countries tend to have as many as they have general's uniforms.