Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Police Retribution
	
		
I don't. My own ideas are very different, but my own ideas are well-defined and structured. On the other hand, I know nothing about yours.
	
		
iirc, Jim Crow laws were ruled unconstitutional, which means that they were unjust within the context of the rule of law upon which this society is based.
	
		
Without specifically defining justice, you cannot separate it from law.
							
						
					
			
			
				   Originally posted by Felch 
I don't see why you so closely tie the two together. It's certainly not something that people have always done throughout history.
	I don't see why you so closely tie the two together. It's certainly not something that people have always done throughout history.
			
			
				 Easy, quick example - Jim Crow.  There were laws on the books that were unjust.  The laws are written by democratically elected legislatures, but they did not serve the purpose of creating a just society.
			
		
	
			
			
				 Justice is a fundamental right of all people.  The law is an attempt at providing justice to the people.  Our modern legal system is very good at that, but it isn't perfect.
			
		
	
							
						
							
						
Comment