Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Well, here it goes buddy"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Well, here it goes buddy"

    How do you, a grand jury member vote? Bring down charges on this murderous busybody or confirm his undeniable right to self defense?

    June 30, 2008, 1:08PM
    Joe Horn cleared by grand jury in Pasadena shootings
    Panel issues no-bill after two weeks of testimony

    By BRIAN ROGERS and RUTH RENDON
    Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

    The shooting of two burglary suspects has sparked heated debate about property rights, gun control and other issues.

    A Harris County grand jury decided today that Joe Horn should not be charged with a crime for shooting two suspected burglars he confronted outside his neighbor's home in Pasadena last fall.

    The decision to clear Horn of wrongdoing came two weeks after the grand jury began considering evidence in the case, including Horn's testimony last week.

    Horn, a 62-year-old retiree, became the focus of an intense public debate after the Nov. 14 shootings. Many supporters praised him as a hero for using deadly force to protect property, while others dismissed him as a killer who should have heeded a 911 operator's instructions to stay in his house and wait for police.

    Horn called authorities after hearing breaking glass and seeing two men climb through a window into his next-door neighbor's home in the 7400 block of Timberline.

    The 911 operator urged Horn to remain inside, but he went outside with his 12-gauge shotgun and came face-to-face with Diego Ortiz, 30, and Hernando Riascos Torres, 38.

    According to a transcript of Horn's 911 call, which he made about 2 p.m., the operator repeatedly urged Horn to stay in his house, but Horn said he did not believe it would be right to let the burglars get away.

    "Well, here it goes, buddy," Horn can be heard telling the operator. "You hear the shotgun clicking and I'm going."

    The operator replies: "Don't go outside."

    Then the tape records Horn warning someone: "Move and you're dead!" Two quick shots can be heard, followed by a pause and then a third shot.


    Pasadena police Capt. A.H. "Bud" Corbett said a few weeks after the shooting that a plainclothes detective had parked in front of Horn's house in response to the 911 call. He said the detective saw the men between Horn's house and his neighbor's before they crossed into Horn's front yard.

    It appeared that neither Horn nor the men knew a police officer was present, Corbett said.

    "It was over within seconds. The detective never had time to say anything before the shots were fired," Corbett said. "At first, the officer was assessing the situation. Then he was worried Horn might mistake him for the 'wheel man' (getaway driver). He ducked at one point."

    When Horn confronted the suspects in his yard, he raised his shotgun to his shoulder, Corbett said. However the men ignored his order to freeze.

    Corbett said one man ran toward Horn, but had angled away from him toward the street when he was shot in the back just before reaching the curb.

    "The detective confirmed that this suspect was actually closer to Horn after he initiated his run than at the time when first confronted," said Corbett. "Horn said he felt in jeopardy."

    Ortiz and Torres died a short distance from Horn's house, both shot in the back.

    As the grand jury began hearing evidence in the case this month, Horn's attorney, Tom Lambright, said recently that Horn regrets his decision to confront the men.

    "Was it a mistake from a legal standpoint? No. But a mistake in his life? Yes," Lambright said. "Because it's affected him terribly. And if he had it to do over again, he would stay inside.

    "I don't think anybody can really appreciate the magnitude that something like this has on a person's personality."

    Lambright said Horn didn't expect to be involved in a shooting, but rather expected to see the two men running or driving away.

    "He thought he was gathering evidence for the police department," Lambright said.

    The shooting brought hundreds of protesters to the Village Grove East subdivision where Horn lives with his daughter and her family. One protest included supporters of Houston activist Quanell X and motorcyclists countering his remarks. The protest which brought hundreds to the neighborhood led to the Pasadena City Council to approve a city ordinance banning protests in front of a residential home.

    Aside from the shooting itself, the national debate revolved around the fact that Ortiz and Torres were illegal immigrants from Colombia. Torres had been sent to prison for dealing cocaine and was deported in 1999.
    19
    Press Charges for Murder
    73.68%
    14
    Decline to Press Charges
    15.79%
    3
    Bananas are dangerous weapons!
    10.53%
    2
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

  • #2
    If I'd been a grand juror, I would have applied the law. You can use deadly force to protect a person or to protect your own property but not to protect the property of someone else.

    It's easy to see that "what if's" which could have turned this situation into a nightmare.

    What if the neighbor had had a seizure, had dispatched the two men to fetch is medication from home and, in the confusion, had forgotten to give them the keys. We could have had two Good Samaritans, shot in the back.

    Or what if Horn had spotted the detective in his car and had wrongly assumed the detective was the get-away driver. Then we'd have had a dead cop.

    Whatever was stolen wasn't worth two men's lives.

    Comment


    • #3
      The guy was out of line. He's a vigilante, and I thought we weren't big on such things...

      -Arrian
      grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

      The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

      Comment


      • #4
        Too bad that bastard didn't get shot. Maybe next time.
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment


        • #5
          That's a tad harsh. He shot two people who (from the sound of things) were in the act of committing a crime. They're not innocents.

          That said, I want stuff like this handled by the police, not Joe McShotgun.

          -Arrian
          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Arrian
            That's a tad harsh. The shot two people who (from the sound of things) were in the act of committing a crime. They're not innocents.

            That said, I want stuff like this handled by the police, not Joe McShotgun.

            -Arrian
            So it's your opinion that the punishment for murder should depend on whether your victim has committed a crime or not?
            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Arrian
              The guy was out of line. He's a vigilante, and I thought we weren't big on such things...

              -Arrian
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #8
                Kid - I was reacting to your comment that you wished he got shot.

                If you had posted "he should be tried for murder" I would not have given that response.

                Do you understand the distinction?

                -Arrian
                grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Arrian
                  Kid - I was reacting to your comment that you wished he got shot.

                  If you had posted "he should be tried for murder" I would not have given that response.

                  Do you understand the distinction?

                  -Arrian
                  "They're not innocents."

                  Only children are innocent. What's the difference between this guy doing what he did and just shooting people at random?
                  I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                  - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'll take it, then, that you don't understand the distinction I was drawing. Ok.

                    As for your question, the difference is that the people he shot were in the middle of committing a crime. That crime was burglary, which is not the same as, for instance, murder or rape*, but is nonetheless a reprehensible activity.

                    * - let's change the facts a bit. Let's say the guy breaks up an attempted rape and shoots the would-be rapist. Then how do you feel about him? He's still a vigilante, but... I mean... not quite the same is it?

                    -Arrian
                    grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                    The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      opcorn:
                      You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Don't get too comfortable on that couch, Krill. With luck, I'm outta here in ~10 minutes.

                        -Arrian
                        grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                        The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Arrian


                          * - let's change the facts a bit. Let's say the guy breaks up an attempted rape and shoots the would-be rapist. Then how do you feel about him? He's still a vigilante, but... I mean... not quite the same is it?
                          Precisely. The law protects acts undertaken to protect people...but not to protect acts undertaken to protect the property of other. So shooting someone to prevant a rape is a legal defense. Shooting someone in the back after they have committed a burglary is not.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Arrian
                            I'll take it, then, that you don't understand the distinction I was drawing. Ok.

                            As for your question, the difference is that the people he shot were in the middle of committing a crime. That crime was burglary, which is not the same as, for instance, murder or rape*, but is nonetheless a reprehensible activity.
                            According to you and some gun happy wacko. But there are a lot of people in the population who have commited crimes like that but live just as morally now as you and everyone else that you consider so morally superior. If someone murders them is that not such a big deal as if they had just gone at shot someone at random?

                            * - let's change the facts a bit. Let's say the guy breaks up an attempted rape and shoots the would-be rapist. Then how do you feel about him? He's still a vigilante, but... I mean... not quite the same is it?

                            -Arrian
                            I would not be as repulsed by him, but I'm still against him shooting people.
                            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Arrian
                              Don't get too comfortable on that couch, Krill. With luck, I'm outta here in ~10 minutes.

                              -Arrian
                              Eh, lucky you...though I get the couch all to myself wednesday through friday.
                              You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X