data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f4e/b5f4efd230535f9dd375b13f5fd41a3270c97215" alt=""
... how fracked up was he? I mean seriously, I can't help but wonder that every time I delve into that otherwise wonderful mythos that metaphorically explains to us the fundamental truth that the universe is a very alien place, one nearly impossible to understand, so out of sync with the human experience and the human world that trying to see it for what it is will ultimately results in madness. But just because you are right does not mean you are not screwed up. Now having posed this question and expecting a response of 11, I add a subquestion, why?
Let's be honest here none of us are really bothered by his misogyny, blatant racism and off course the many WTF moments. So why does he convey a fundamental picture of, well, something being wrong about him? What is the nerve he touches? I've established that its not a challenge to the doublethink (politically correct opinions), which he can only provide as a reminder that what is currently "true" was not always "true". But in that regard he is no different from any other author who wrote before the 1960's. The WTF moments aren't it either, though they do help. Being horrifying isn't good enough; we're too desensitized to that.
So, your thoughts? And no, this post is not worth rereading. I made absolutely no puns, I leave those to the professional spammer.
Note: Posted this in a SF forum, but got few responses, lets see if poly is better.
Comment