Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Candidates United on Sudan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Candidates United on Sudan

    CLINTON, McCAIN, OBAMA JOINT STATEMENT: ‘WE STAND UNITED ON SUDAN’

    Candidates pledge ‘unstinting resolve’ in ending Darfur genocide, Save Darfur Coalition hails historic joint statement on ending Sudan crisis

    WASHINGTON – The Save Darfur Coalition today hailed the historic joint statement by the three remaining U.S. presidential candidates stating their united resolve to end the Darfur genocide and bring peace and security to all Sudan.

    “As we campaign for President of the United States over the next several months, we expect there to be significant focus on the many differences between us,” reads the statement, which is also featured today in a New York Times advertisement. “It is with this awareness that we are taking the uncommon step of issuing a joint statement about an issue. After more than five years of genocide, the Sudanese government and its proxies continue to commit atrocities against civilians in Darfur. This is unacceptable to the American people and to the world community.”

    A copy of the advertisement can be viewed here: www.savedarfur.org/darfurunited.

    “With this unequivocal joint statement, these candidates have elected to transcend their differences in party and policies and unite for the peace and protection of the people in Sudan,” said Save Darfur Coalition board chair Rev. Gloria White-Hammond, M.D. “Candidates should bear in mind, though, that the work of Darfur advocates is not done. The constituency of conscience that has come together around Darfur is determined to make clear to the candidates that a plan for peace in Sudan is a prerequisite for the White House.”

    “The unanimous resolve among the candidates to bring an end to the genocide is a testament to the gravity of the situation in Darfur and also the effectiveness of the advocates’ campaigns to move U.S. and world leaders to action,” said Larry Sabato, founder and director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics. “In fact, this may be the first issue to generate a joint statement of this magnitude since the foreign policy advisors to Franklin D. Roosevelt and Thomas E. Dewey asserted their respective candidates’ resolve to end World War II prior to the 1944 presidential election.”

    Ongoing and escalating violence in Sudan – including the recent destruction of the contested town of Abyei – reinforces the importance of this united determination from the candidates. Following the Justice and Equality Movement attack on the capital May 10, reports from the ground indicate that the Sudanese government’s response has been heavy-handed and rife with human rights abuses. The reports indicate widespread detentions and disappearances, summary executions, crackdowns on Darfuri journalists and lawyers, and the looting of Darfuri homes and businesses in and around Khartoum. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir virtually promised a new round of brutal attacks in Darfur on May 20, leaving millions of civilians in the villages, cities and IDP camps in fear for their lives.

    Throughout the presidential campaign, activists across the country have engaged the candidates on Darfur through initiatives like Ask the Candidates (www.askthecandidates.org) and Save Darfur’s Voter Education Project. The coalition launched its voter education project (www.savedarfur.org/candidates) last November – which features two-minute YouTube op-eds from the candidates. In Iowa and New Hampshire, hundreds of caucus and primary-goers signed full-page advertisements pressing Republican and Democratic presidential candidates to outline a clear policy to end the suffering in Darfur and to make the prevention of future atrocities a priority in their campaigns. The coalition will continue its efforts to ensure the Darfur genocide remains a central topic in the race for the White House.

    “Today, we wish to make clear to the Sudanese government that on this moral issue of tremendous importance, there is no divide between us,” the statement adds. “If peace and security for the people of Sudan are not in place when one of us is inaugurated as President on January 20, 2009, we pledge that the next Administration will pursue these goals with unstinting resolve.”

    The full text of the statement appears below.

    WE STAND UNITED ON SUDAN
    As we campaign for President of the United States over the next several months, we expect there to be significant focus on the many differences between us. After all, elections are about choices in a free society. We have had a spirited contest so far and fully expect a robust debate about issues foreign and domestic right up to Election Day.

    As we engage in this process, we are fully aware that friend and foe around the globe are watching and sometimes reacting based on their own analysis of the latest developments in the campaign.

    It is with this awareness that we are taking the uncommon step of issuing a joint statement about an issue.

    After more than five years of genocide, the Sudanese government and its proxies continue to commit atrocities against civilians in Darfur. This is unacceptable to the American people and to the world community.

    We deplore all violence against the people of Darfur. There can be no doubt that the Sudanese government is chiefly responsible for the violence and is able to end it. We condemn the Sudanese government’s consistent efforts to undermine peace and security, including its repeated attacks against its own people and the multiple barriers it has put up to the swift and effective deployment of the United Nations-African Union peacekeeping force. We further condemn the Sudanese government’s refusal to adhere to the terms of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that ended the conflict in southern Sudan.

    Today, we wish to make clear to the Sudanese government that on this moral issue of tremendous importance, there is no divide between us. We stand united and demand that the genocide and violence in Darfur be brought to an end and that the CPA be fully implemented. Even as we campaign for the presidency, we will use our standing as Senators to press for the steps needed to ensure that the United States honors, in practice and in deed, its commitment to the cause of peace and protection of Darfur’s innocent citizenry. We will continue to keep a close watch on events in Sudan and speak out for its marginalized peoples. It would be a huge mistake for the Khartoum regime to think that it will benefit by running out the clock on the Bush Administration. If peace and security for the people of Sudan are not in place when one of us is inaugurated as President on January 20, 2009, we pledge that the next Administration will pursue these goals with unstinting resolve.
    Notice how they don't take any responsibility at all. Hell, Clinton's husband stood by and watched the genocide in Rawanda unfold.

    These people are so full of ****.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

  • #2
    Let's face it. None of them will actually do anything more then make speeches.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #3
      Of course not. They would have to admit that that's all they've done thus far, before they actually did anything.
      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm guessing "unstinting resolve" means writing a harsh letter to the Sudanese government then having their pictures taken with a black guy.

        Comment


        • #5
          The alternative to said harsh letter is, of course, sending US troops into Sudan - wresting control from the government, and then staying there for [unknown period of time].

          I'm sure people would be just WILD about that.

          -Arrian
          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Riesstiu IV
            I'm guessing "unstinting resolve" means writing a harsh letter to the Sudanese government then having their pictures taken with a black guy.
            In that case, Obama's ahead of the game.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Riesstiu IV
              I'm guessing "unstinting resolve" means writing a harsh letter to the Sudanese government then having their pictures taken with a black guy.
              Wait... you mean a politician might actually be expected to do more!
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • #8
                If you want to avert disaster in Darfur, you need to put pressure on the dictator of Chad. He's the one that won't allow much relief for the refugees, and Chad is where much of the starvation is happening.

                The crisis in Darfur, much as it is being exacerbated by the Sudanese government, isn't solvable by negotiations or putting pressure on Sudan.

                It is, at its root, caused by global warming, and the encroaching desert driving the nomads out of their traditional grazing ranges into the areas of the farmers. Before they had a symbiotic relationship, where the nomads would bring their herds to graze the farmers fields after harvesting season, and the animals manure would fertilize the fields. But nor that they have been driven from their traditional range by the failure of the rains, they've decided to stay in the farmers' fields.
                Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Why should Chad have to deal with the refugees of Sudan?

                  Global warming itself is pretty much a baloney reason, of course, given by people who don't actually know but want to blame it on something... climates have changed in the world for thousands of millenia, and nomads move each time they change. That's why they are called nomads... it's how the Native Americans came to be Native Americans and not North Koreans, after all.
                  <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                  I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Because that's where the refugees are, and because they joined the UN, which kinda obligates them to do so.

                    Your defense of global warming goes something like this. People have always died. People will always die. So there's no reason to assume that the man over there with the multiple stab wounds is a victim of murder.
                    Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Arrian
                      The alternative to said harsh letter is, of course, sending US troops into Sudan - wresting control from the government, and then staying there for [unknown period of time].

                      I'm sure people would be just WILD about that.

                      -Arrian
                      Putting pressure on China to put pressure on Sudan would be a start.

                      You know "taking a stand" means that you are actually willing to pay some consequences for your actions. Saying you are against genocide is easy. It would be nice if people would actually think a world free from these horrible things is actually worth something.
                      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                        Because that's where the refugees are, and because they joined the UN, which kinda obligates them to do so.

                        Your defense of global warming goes something like this. People have always died. People will always die. So there's no reason to assume that the man over there with the multiple stab wounds is a victim of murder.
                        Except the man over there is just lying on the floor, possibly dead, and there are no visible stab wounds
                        <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                        I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          [SIZE=1] It is, at its root, caused by global warming, and the encroaching desert driving the nomads out of their traditional grazing ranges into the areas of the farmers.
                          The Shahara desert has been expanding for several MILLENIA, long before the the centruy and a half of the industrial era.
                          Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                          Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                          "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                          From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Kidicious
                            Of course not. They would have to admit that that's all they've done thus far, before they actually did anything.
                            What do you want them to do?
                            John Brown did nothing wrong.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Kidicious


                              Putting pressure on China to put pressure on Sudan would be a start.
                              Explain, precisely, what you mean by "putting pressure on China." What exact measures? What leverage do we really have?

                              You know "taking a stand" means that you are actually willing to pay some consequences for your actions. Saying you are against genocide is easy. It would be nice if people would actually think a world free from these horrible things is actually worth something.
                              Sounds nice. What's your plan, and what are the potential consequences?

                              -Arrian
                              grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                              The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X