Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Protecting Marriage

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Protecting Marriage

    Single workers at one of Iran's major state-owned companies have been told to marry by September or face being fired, Iranian newspapers have reported.

    The Pars Special Economic Energy Zone Company employs thousands of people, mostly young men, on Iran's Gulf coast.

    Being married is a job requirement, a directive from the company is reported as saying.

    Correspondents say the ruling appears to be an attempt to reduce the number of prostitutes working in the area.

    The company controls Iran's large network of gas and petrochemical facilities around the coastal city of Assalouyeh on the Gulf coast.

    Its directive, according to the Etemad newspaper, says that despite requests "some of our colleagues did not fulfil their commitments and are still single".

    It continues: "As being married is one of the criteria of employment, we are announcing for the last time that all the female and male colleagues have until September 21 to go ahead with this important and moral religious duty."

    In the same vein, the governor of the eastern province of North Khorasan ruled recently that only married people would be hired for official posts in the region.

    Economic difficulties in Iran have led many people to postpone getting married, despite sexual relations being illegal outside marriage.
    BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service


    Allowing singles to get jobs at all
    Blah

  • #2
    This . . . .


    is for real?


    I think American religious Christian right fanatics and Middle Eastern Muslim fanatics have a lot more in common than they would ever like to admit with this obssessive knee-jerk over so-called "traditional" marriage.

    Let's round them up, and lock them in a large cell together.
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

    Comment


    • #3
      Correspondents say the ruling appears to be an attempt to reduce the number of prostitutes working in the area.
      I would think forcing people to get married would increase the need for prostitutes working in the area.
      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • #4
        Isn't there a Muslim tradition that allows for temporary marriages? I forget the exact term, but I wonder if it would apply here.
        John Brown did nothing wrong.

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah, but that's for getting prostitutes and such.
          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

          Comment


          • #6
            Isn't there a Muslim tradition that allows for temporary marriages? I forget the exact term, but I wonder if it would apply here.
            Yes, I believe it's called dodaho.
            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • #7
              Would it count in this case? I mean, they've got the prostitutes right there, they could just get the temp marriage (which IIRC is legit in Iran) and then dissolve it once this dies down.
              John Brown did nothing wrong.

              Comment

              Working...
              X