Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I think a court should ONLY decline to enforce a breach in contract if the breached condition is against the law or against public policy.
I see neither here.
I think a court should ONLY decline to enforce a breach in contract if the breached condition is against the law or against public policy.
I see neither here.
Now, of course, I don't know the whole story... but I'm assuming the woman acknowledged that she represented to the man that she was a virgin and realized due to the nature of the wedding that it was important. In such case, I don't see why a court WOULDN'T enforce the annulment.
I think you got it right.
I'd like to expand marriage as well, but by the private/religious sector... I'd actually like the state out of it. Have a legal "partner" designation for being able to visit you in the hospital and inherit all that stuff, but that's easily changed.
I work in pensions and health care law... don't really "practice" in the sense of standing up in front of a judge or anything though.
Yeah, I purposely avoided that. I don't do office/desk work well. You may remember my thread pleading for help making it through a stretch of no court dates...
Comment