Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

America grinding to a halt?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    From BBC America:

    LA workers swap cars for subway

    By David Willis
    BBC News, Los Angeles


    In Los Angeles, the rising price of petrol is prompting people to travel to work by train rather than by car. According to figures from the city's subway system, the number of passengers increased by more than 14% in the first three months of 2008.

    America's second largest city is a sprawl. Fifty-two suburbs in search of a city, so the old saying goes

    I am going to let you in on a little secret, but promise me please you will not breathe a word, otherwise I may never be able to show my face in certain parts of this town again.

    This week I did something which - in nearly 10 years of living in Los Angeles - I have never, ever done before.

    Cue the drum roll: I travelled to work on the subway.

    I did it because the figures suggest it is the trend. And (hem hem) being the trend-setter that I am, that is the only excuse I need.


    Labyrinths of freeways

    You see - like most people here - I would rather stick pins in my eyeballs than hop on a bus or a train.

    That is not because I am a snob, but because America's second largest city is a sprawl. Fifty-two suburbs in search of a city, so the old saying goes.

    And the prospect of sitting in grid-locked traffic on one of the labyrinths of freeways, only to pay the equivalent of a small dowry for the right to park, may sound miserable, but given the distances involved, it is still invariably quicker than public transport.

    In the early 1900s, Los Angeles boasted the largest urban rail network of any city in America, more than a thousand miles of track

    Yet certain things have happened here which have prompted some in this car-crazed city to question their betrothal to the internal combustion engine and weigh the possibility of a trial separation.

    Congestion is at times so bad there are fears the place could one day grind to a halt. And on top of that there is the rising cost of running those gas guzzling machines.

    Although motorists in Europe would give their right arm for petrol at nearly $4 (£2) a gallon (assuming of course they steer with the left), here it is nothing short of the end of the world as we know it.


    Old glamour


    All of which accounts for an unprecedented spike in the number of people taking to public transport, and explains why yours truly found himself in the sepulchral surroundings of Union Station in downtown Los Angeles earlier this week.

    The last of the great train terminals to be built in the United States, Union Station fuses Moorish and art deco architecture to truly spectacular effect.

    I noticed the first draw-back of the LA subway system: it didn't go anywhere I wanted to go

    It was here - amid the marble walls and frescoed ceilings - that movie stars of the 40s would arrive in Hollywood flanked by their agents and assistant.

    This was back in the days when train travel was seen as glamorous and genteel, and Union Station epitomised the promise of a glittering future for the railroad.

    Such promise was realised, for a while at least. In the early 1900s Los Angeles boasted the largest urban rail network of any city in America, more than a thousand miles of track.


    Limited routes


    Yet by the mid-1960s train travel had all but hit the buffers. Only in the last few years has there been a modest revival, prompting hopes that LA's cinderella subway system may be catching on.

    After the sort of false starts that I believe to be entirely consistent with getting used to public transport (buying the wrong ticket, getting on the wrong train), I noticed the first draw-back of the LA subway system: it didn't go anywhere I wanted to go.

    I scoured a map of the entire system for somewhere fun to spend the day - what about shopping in Beverly Hills? Sorry, not on the subway route. Santa Monica beach? Ditto. Burbank, where the big movie studios are based? Uh-huh. Well I could always go to the airport to watch the planes take off? Er, not on the subway I couldn't.

    Being stuck in traffic is, after all, that much easier when the roof is down, the palm trees are swaying gently and the sun is shining brightly in your face

    So I opted instead for a trip to the Kodak Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard, where the annual Oscars ceremony takes place.

    Sitting next to me was accountant Chris Peterson, who said he liked the subway because you could always get a seat. Which didn't come as a surprise to either of us, since, aside from not really going anywhere, the network's other failing seems to be a chronic lack of self promotion.

    Chris said he had only just discovered there was a subway system in LA - and he has lived here for 30 years.

    Part of the psyche

    As we arrived in Hollywood, I got chatting with Bradley Chapman, who makes those life-sized cardboard cut-outs of movie stars which cinemas use to promote their films. Like Chris, he had recently taken to the subway because he could no longer afford the price of petrol.

    Bradley's new commute is the antithesis of the LA norm. As well as taking the train, another part of his journey actually involves putting one foot in front of the other, a heretical notion that simply will never catch on.

    The man from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the body which runs the LA subway, seemed to agree its route was a little limited.

    He told me there were plans for expansion but admitted it could be 10 years or more before they reach fruition.

    Despite the rise in oil prices, it is my guess there will be seats on the LA subway for some time to come, so much are cars a part of the psyche.

    And, being stuck in traffic is, after all, that much easier when the roof is down, the palm trees are swaying gently and the sun is shining brightly in your face.
    Two things I've noticed this week. (1) The Red Line & Gold Line are both jammed with people. (2) Our freeways are still bumper to bumper.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Zkribbler
      From BBC America:



      Two things I've noticed this week. (1) The Red Line & Gold Line are both jammed with people. (2) Our freeways are still bumper to bumper.
      The LA subway was actually really nice. It got me to with in a block of where I was going and it only cost $2.

      San Diego to Universal City using only the train and subway with a total cost of less then $30. The only problem I see is that LA's current subway lines really are jam packed and they need to build more lines to more parts of the city.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by DanS
        There was an article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday about more Americans buying motorinos like the Vespa. I do see a few more of those around, and more bicycles too, but that trend began in my neighborhood well before the oil price spike. It seems like the trend was driven more by the addition of bicycle lanes to city streets and the like.

        As for public transportation, ridership on the subway is up something like 3% or 4% this year, even though there was a fare increase a couple of months ago.

        I get a $60/mo transit subsidy (it's a tax write-off for the boss), but I have still been commuting via bike at least one to two days a week since February. I'm not saving money now due to the subsidy, but I'm banking hundreds on my SmartTrip for the future.

        I've noticed an uptick in the number of cyclists and bus passengers but not an increase in Vespas and the like. DC still has a long way to go in terms of making things easier for cyclists....
        If you look around and think everyone else is an *******, you're the *******.

        Comment

        Working...
        X