Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama: No more debates before May 6th

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 8
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 template Next
  • #16
    Originally posted by DinoDoc
    We obviously watch completely different media if you believe it is Hillary that gets the pass from the press.

    Re Wright, Ayers, Rezco, etc.: All those go to issues of character and would seem to be at least in my view legit topics to press him on.
    Then why aren't you upset with the characters that McCain associates with? McCain happily accepted the endorsement of a hate group. Where his flag lapel as well?

    There are non-issues for morons to get hung up about.
    Last edited by DaShi; April 27, 2008, 17:14.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment

    • #17
      Originally posted by DinoDoc
      We obviously watch completely different media if you believe it is Hillary that gets the pass from the press.
      Yeah, totally. HILLARY gets a free pass?

      What, Saint Obama isn't being as deified by the press these days and suddenly they are being unfair on him and giving Clinton a pass? Wow.
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment

      • #18
        Dashi: I wasn't aware McCain was in the Democratic debates.
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment

        • #19
          By refusing additional debates, he is really opening himself up to some nice attack ads

          Comment

          • #20
            Originally posted by DinoDoc
            Dashi: I wasn't aware McCain was in the Democratic debates.
            Ah, I see. You want to change your argument when challenged.
            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
            "Capitalism ho!"

            Comment

            • #21
              Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui


              Yeah, totally. HILLARY gets a free pass?

              What, Saint Obama isn't being as deified by the press these days and suddenly they are being unfair on him and giving Clinton a pass? Wow.
              Dinodoc is clueless as usual.
              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
              "Capitalism ho!"

              Comment

              • #22
                Originally posted by DaShi


                Ah, I see. You want to change your argument when challenged.
                The arguement is that they are legit questions to ask a candidate in a debate. You've yet to rebut that position other than girlish whining about McCain. It's quite sad really. Are you a regular Chris Matthews viewer?
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment

                • #23
                  Originally posted by DinoDoc
                  The arguement is that they are legit questions to ask a candidate in a debate. You've yet to rebut that position other than girlish whining about McCain. It's quite sad really. Are you a regular Chris Matthews viewer?
                  You changed your argument again. You're a joke!
                  “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                  "Capitalism ho!"

                  Comment

                  • #24


                    I don't think DaShi knew what the argument was in the first place.
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      I think he's just free posting at the moment because he doesn't seem to be making much sense.
                      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        Dinodoc's arguments:

                        1. Associates are important to establish character and should be questioned.

                        2. Only democratic debates should be discussed.

                        3. They are legit questions to ask in a debate.

                        I've been responding to the first one. Since then 2 more have shown up to avoid answering the challenge to the first one.

                        Sad that I have to explain this.
                        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                        "Capitalism ho!"

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DaShi
                          Dinodoc's arguments:

                          1. Associates are important to establish character and should be questioned.
                          Yes.

                          2. Only democratic debates should be discussed.
                          This is a thread about the Democratic debates. Is it not?

                          3. They are legit questions to ask in a debate.
                          That seems to be tied in with point one to me.
                          I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                          For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            But you brought up 3 different arguments. I choose the first one which did not involve the other 2 until you saw you'd lose the argument without them.

                            And you'll lose the argument with them too. So better add some more.
                            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                            "Capitalism ho!"

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              Let's put this in a way I think you might understand, DaShi. Let's say that McCain went to a Christian Identity church and regarded the pastor as being a member of his family and the pastor McCain regarded so highly was recorded making offensive statements about Chinks, saying God Bless IEDs, and what not. Let's also say that McCain has a friendly relationship with an unrepentant abortion clinic bomber who regrest not setting more bombs. And finally let's say that McCain was involved with a shady deal with a developer currently under indictment and was also a campaign contributor. What would your and others reaction be?
                              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                Originally posted by DinoDoc
                                Let's put this in a way I think you might understand, DaShi. Let's say that McCain went to a Christian Identity church and regarded the pastor as being a member of his family and the pastor McCain regarded so highly was recorded making offensive statements about Chinks, saying God Bless IEDs, and what not.
                                Wouldn't care. This information doesn't tell me anything about who McCain actually is. It makes assumptions, but assumptions aren't facts.

                                Let's also say that McCain has a friendly relationship with an unrepentant abortion clinic bomber who regrest not setting more bombs.
                                Wouldn't care. This information doesn't tell me anything about who McCain actually is. It makes assumptions, but assumptions aren't facts.

                                And finally let's say that McCain was involved with a shady deal with a developer currently under indictment and was also a campaign contributor.
                                Well, this is a bit different. I'd want to know what McCain's role in this "shady" deal was. But if it was shown that his role was perfectly legal and that he did nothing wrong, I wouldn't hold this against him. I certainly wouldn't waste taxpayer money investigating this after the facts of his innocence were out just to try to make him look guilty. If that's what you're looking for.

                                So, now back to my post. Any real answers?
                                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                                "Capitalism ho!"

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 template Next
                                Working...
                                X