I'm glad I don't own any of that garbage
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OMG!
Collapse
X
-
OMG!
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFTags: None
-
It's ok, if you're into roller coasters.Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
-
Monday should be interesting.THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
-
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
-
There is a nice catalog on Wikipedia of some of his missed calls
3/11/08: Finally, Cramer read some viewer emails. The first email asked why Textron (TXT) has dropped so much, and Cramer said that he likes this stock because it has a good mix of military and industrial customers. The next email thanked Cramer for staying on top of the XM (XMSR) - Sirius (SIRI) merger and fighting the NAB and other entities holding up the deal. The last emailer asked if he should sell Bear Stearns (BSC), and Cramer said no way.
Comment
-
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
-
Oh, dig through various archives and you come across all kinds of fun stuff. Picked from a random date (September 15th 2004), Stephen L Jen at GEF (Morgan Stanley's economic opinions page):
The dollar is likely to surprise most investors. We have just completed our quarterly forecast revision and reaffirm our out-of-consensus structural USD view. The dominant view in the market remains overwhelmingly USD bearish short- and medium-term, but we believe the USD index has bottomed, and will gradually reassert itself in the quarters ahead, particularly against GBP, AUD, EUR, and JPY.
Granted, this isn't entirely outlandish, since the USD did bottom out the next few months and did recover afterwards. It's just that the USD resumed on a far more serious slide afterwards and is currently experiencing (much) greater depths vs those 4 currencies (which isn't something he didn't predict).
I don’t see the US as another Japan. There are indeed some similarities, but there are critical differences: the US does not have a nation-wide property bubble and the banking system is not exposed to such a big risk of default on mortgages.
Granted, he may be right the US is not another Japan, but his 2 main arguments aren't generating a lot of confidence.
A global slowdown is not necessarily USD negative. Specifically, if Asia is indeed decelerating, it would be extremely unlikely that the Ministry of Finance in Japan permits a significant USD/JPY sell off. Similarly, it has always been very unlikely that Beijing revalues the RMB. But it would be virtually impossible if China does decelerate more sharply. If the USD cannot weaken against the currencies of two of the countries against which it runs the largest trade imbalances, I’m not sure the USD can weaken at all.
Granted, he may be right a global slowdown isn't necessarily USD negative. It's just that it hasn't transpired yet. Wrong on the USD/JPY and the USD/RMB count.
We expect the undershoot in the USD index to be modest in magnitude, despite history suggesting otherwise. The USD correction has come mainly against only a handful of currencies, and in my view, the USD index cannot significant undershoot because the pressures would prove to be too severe for these few countries.
Why on earth would anyone try to predict that an undershoot will remain limited if it by definition isn't based on economic fundamentals? Wrong on the too much pressure count (so far).Last edited by Colon™; March 16, 2008, 22:31.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
Comment