Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

China on USA

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • China on USA

    Well Chineze are getting used to the marketing strategy of pointing out to others faults to divert attention...

    luckily for them USA provides them with plenty of material
    The Human Rights Record of the US in 2007 lists a multitude of cases to show its human rights situation and its rights violation. Full Text


    and to their credit, apart from the expected, they managed to collect some fun stuff, also some suprising details... over the past year and all that by referencing western sources...


    China issued on Thursday the Human Rights Record of the United States in 2007[click to read full text] in response to the Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2007 issued by the US Department of State on Tuesday.

    Released by the Information Office of China's State Council, the Chinese report listed a multitude of cases to show the human rights situation in the United States and its violation of human rights in other countries.

    By publishing the Human Rights Record of the United States in 2007, the report says it aims to "help the people have a better understanding of the real situation in the United States and as a reminder for the United States to reflect upon its own issues".

    The report reviewed the human rights record of the United States in 2007 from seven perspectives: on life and personal security, on human rights violations by law enforcement and judicial departments, on civil and political rights, on economic, social and cultural rights, on racial discrimination, on rights of women and children and on the United States' violation of human rights in other countries


    some snippets
    no suprises below...

    The report points out that law enforcement and judicial departments in the United States have abused their power and seriously violated the freedom and rights of its citizens.

    Cases in which US law enforcement authorities allegedly violated victims' civil rights increased by 25 percent from fiscal year 2001 to 2007 over the previous seven years, according to statistics from US Department of Justice.

    However, the majority of law enforcement officers accused of brutality were not prosecuted in the end.


    surveillance by Wal-Mart

    Workers' right to unionize has been restricted in the United States. It was reported that union membership fell by 326,000 in 2006, bringing the percentage of employees in unions to 12 percent, down from 20 percent in 1983.

    Employer resistance stopped 53 percent of nonunion workers from joining a union, The New York Times reported on January 26, 2007.

    According to a report by the Human Rights Watch, when Wal-Mart stores faced unionization drives, the company often broke the law by, for example, eavesdropping on workers, training surveillance cameras on them and firing those who favored unions.


    manipulation of the press - this is a good catch


    The US administration manipulated the press. On October 23, 2007, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) staged a news conference on California wildfires.

    A half-dozen questions were asked within 15 minutes at the event by FEMA staff members posing as reporters.

    The news was aired by U.S-based television stations. After the Washington Post disclosed the farce, FEMA tried to defend itself for staging the fake briefing.


    hungry people??? that is a suprising

    Hungry and homeless people have increased significantly in US cities. The US Department of Agriculture said in a report released on November 14, 2007 that at least 35.5 million people in the United States, including 12.63 million children, went hungry in 2006, an increase of 390,000 from 2005.

    About 11 million people lived in "very low food security", according to Reuters.



    Millions of underage girls become sex slaves in the United States. Statistics from the Department of Justice show some 100,000 to three million US children under the age of 18 are involved in prostitution. A FBI report says as high as 40 percent of forced prostitutes are minors.


    the numbers in this one are extremely high
    Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
    GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

  • #2
    The Chinese do this every year. On the sex slaves issue, guess from what nationality most of the slaves come from.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment


    • #3
      USA! USA!!
      Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
      The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
      The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

      Comment


      • #4
        USA is the new Darfur

        Comment


        • #5
          I think Texas should have the right to secede.
          Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
          The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
          The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by VetLegion
            USA is the new Darfur
            Will you send me some aid? 5,000 Euros will do.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DaShi
              guess from what nationality most of the slaves come from.
              THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
              AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
              AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
              DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: China on USA

                Originally posted by OneFootInTheGrave
                Well Chineze are getting used to the marketing strategy of pointing out to others faults to divert attention...
                Did you ever read any post by UR?
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #9


                  @ LS and Chinese government both
                  I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                  - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by LordShiva


                    exactly what part of that post upset you exactly?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Riesstiu IV


                      Will you send me some aid? 5,000 Euros will do.


                      American entrepreneurship
                      Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                      GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Re: China on USA

                        Originally posted by DinoDoc
                        Did you ever read any post by UR?
                        that was my first thought when i read the OP.
                        "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                        "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Bear in mind that the Chinese constitution emphasizes slightly different terms in the state-citizen relationship from the US constitution. For this reason alone both sides could quite easily spend the rest of eternity* slinging mud at each other for differences that appear irreconcilable.

                          * Or until one side amends its constitution, whichever occurs first. In other words, eternity

                          The American constitution makes general provisions for individual freedoms and is quite clear about limiting the government's ability to infringe on individual rights, but says nothing about the right to economic provisions by the government. Later court rulings have built on this, saying there's no guaranteed right to education, voting in states, or economic access (except arguably for courts, where the state should give poor people the same chance at a case as rich people). However, the courts are generally unanimous in saying that the government can't limit religion, and definitely can't limit speech even (and especially) where it's criticizing the government's own work.

                          The Chinese constitution shares some issues in common, especially the US Constitution's stipulation of equal treatment for people regardless of racial background. (Arguably the Chinese constitution has even stronger protections for women as it's clearly stated, unlike in the US Constitution where it's implied.)

                          But the Chinese constitution reserves some fairly general powers to the government to intervene in personal activities when the state's interests are affected. Political and personal liberties are not protected (although lately the government has been much less interested in personal activities than they were in the Mao era, and limit themselves to political control). By contrast, the constitution does affirmatively require the Chinese state to provide basic food, shelter, and education to literacy standard for all its citizens. Whether it succeeds or not is a question of degree, but it's an interesting difference from the "state at arm's length" approach of the US Constitution.


                          So ultimately the Chinese can always point the finger and say "in failing to provide basic economic rights to your poor, you fail the human rights test". And America can always point the finger and say "in failing to provide basic political freedoms and reserving the right to interfere in personal freedoms, you fail the human rights test".

                          It's worth noting that the UN has managed to get the US to sign "negative" human rights conventions (e.g. state shouldn't torture, maim, kill, interfere with religion) but could not get the US to sign "affirmative" conventions (e.g. state must provide economic, educational, and nutritional baselines). With China it was the other way round.
                          "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'm curious to see what the Chinese constitution looks like after they finally have an economic meltdown. Their phenomenal growth can't continue forever and when it crashes I can imagine many Chinese will have some pretty serious questions/concerns with their government.
                            "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
                            "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well, if you're looking at it from a purely practical perspective, the Chinese constitution is much less relevant to Chinese lawmaking than the US constitution is for US lawmaking.

                              In America if a law is unconstitutional, it lasts only until somebody brings suit in a federal court, whereupon the court will strike it down. The USC thus has real power as a citable authority.

                              In China the constitution is far more aspirational rather than practical. It outlines goals for the government to strive towards at the end of its development cycle, but leaves a fair bit of leeway for shortcomings on the way there. The constitution can be cited to, and it has occasionally been upheld in high-profile cases, but by and large its authority is persuasive, not binding.

                              If a socioeconomic meltdown happened in China then amending the constitution would still probably not make much difference. In the unlikely event of the masses rising up and demanding political freedoms, it might usher in a western-style constitutional participatory government. But if you want my money, you'd be much more likely to see the masses rising up and demanding increased economic redress first.
                              "lol internet" ~ AAHZ

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X