Tweet
Wiretapping Case Dismissed
"Those who give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." ... Ben Franklin
Bushie claims Art II gives him war powers which are unlimited by the Bill of Rights. With the Supremes upholding a lower court dismissal of a suit challenging this hetrodoxic claim, Bush is left to further trample on the Constitution.
(This story is from the BBC America
Bushie claims Art II gives him war powers which are unlimited by the Bill of Rights. With the Supremes upholding a lower court dismissal of a suit challenging this hetrodoxic claim, Bush is left to further trample on the Constitution.
(This story is from the BBC America
Top US court rejects spying case
US citizens' overseas phone calls and e-mails were monitored
The US Supreme Court has dismissed a legal challenge to a domestic anti-terrorism eavesdropping programme.
President George W Bush authorised the monitoring, without a court order, of international phone calls and e-mails of US citizens after the 9/11 attacks.
The American Civil Liberties Union argued that Mr Bush did not have the constitutional authority to order the programme, which ended last year.
The Supreme Court gave no explanation for its ruling.
Legality questioned
The domestic spying programme was denounced by Democrats and rights activists when it was disclosed in 2005.
A group of civil liberties activists, journalists, academics and lawyers challenged the spying programme in the courts, arguing it violated a 1978 rule prohibiting surveillance of American citizens on US soil without a warrant.
In July last year, an appeals court struck down a lower court's ruling that found the programme to be unconstitutional.
The appeals court, based in Cincinnati, dismissed the case because the plaintiffs had failed to show that their communications had been monitored.
But the Cincinnati judges did not rule on the legality or otherwise of the programme.
The president rejected claims that he broke the law by ordering surveillance without first securing warrants. He argued the eavesdropping programme was necessary and was targeted against al-Qaeda.
The Bush administration has so far refused to release documents about the programme that might reveal who was under surveillance.
US citizens' overseas phone calls and e-mails were monitored
The US Supreme Court has dismissed a legal challenge to a domestic anti-terrorism eavesdropping programme.
President George W Bush authorised the monitoring, without a court order, of international phone calls and e-mails of US citizens after the 9/11 attacks.
The American Civil Liberties Union argued that Mr Bush did not have the constitutional authority to order the programme, which ended last year.
The Supreme Court gave no explanation for its ruling.
Legality questioned
The domestic spying programme was denounced by Democrats and rights activists when it was disclosed in 2005.
A group of civil liberties activists, journalists, academics and lawyers challenged the spying programme in the courts, arguing it violated a 1978 rule prohibiting surveillance of American citizens on US soil without a warrant.
In July last year, an appeals court struck down a lower court's ruling that found the programme to be unconstitutional.
The appeals court, based in Cincinnati, dismissed the case because the plaintiffs had failed to show that their communications had been monitored.
But the Cincinnati judges did not rule on the legality or otherwise of the programme.
The president rejected claims that he broke the law by ordering surveillance without first securing warrants. He argued the eavesdropping programme was necessary and was targeted against al-Qaeda.
The Bush administration has so far refused to release documents about the programme that might reveal who was under surveillance.
...especially, when a court would have issued a search warrant again him. 
Comment