Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Punishing trickster price-raisers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Punishing trickster price-raisers

    We all know it, right?

    A company sells a package of 800 grams of food, for 6$.

    Then, sometime, the company drops the contents to 720grams, while the package size remains the same, and the price remains 6$.

    The size change is reflect in the small print on the back of the packaging where it says "XXX grams" but the package looks the same and is the same size, and sometimes a little filled with air.

    That's effectively increasing price without having anyone notice.


    Well no more - there's now a law against such things, and the Israeli courts have been unusually strict in enforcing it (contrary to them usually being pussies).

    In the last few weeks, several cases against major companies were ruled in favor of plaintiffs who accused the companies of secret price tricking.

    The punishment has been the same: Making extra-large packs of food available at the same price, for a whole year (or in a really large quantity).

    This means that the company from my example, would now have to sell packages of 850 grams for 6$, for a year, or for a very large quantity quota (tens of millions of packages).


    This is great

    Also a new law requires that changes in weight as well as price to be labeled in large print on the packaging

  • #2
    unfortunately there are other things companies can do to hide inflation(or raise prices as the case may be). You'll also have to be on the look out for a general drop in the quality of the material used, and so forth.

    Comment


    • #3
      Usually they don't lie explicitly, even when they reduce the weight they change the weight label to reflect it.

      Comment


      • #4
        I do hate excess packaging. Companies deliberately use air filled extra large packaging (which is only half full) in order to make it look bigger.
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Oerdin
          I do hate excess packaging. Companies deliberately use air filled extra large packaging (which is only half full) in order to make it look bigger.
          QFT. I was very happy a few years back, when retail stores made computer game manufacturers reduce the size of their packages. With the reduced size, the stores could offer more games on their shelves.

          Comment


          • #6
            even when they reduce the weight they change the weight label to reflect it
            it's not very visible, because the weight label is tiny and no one remembers if it was 780 grams, or 720 grams...

            also they make games

            for instance, a 1kg of stuff costs 10$ - they want to raise that.

            so they make extra-large packaging for a month: 1.2 kg for 10$ (20% free!!!!)

            and after that they revert to a smaller package : 0.7 kg for 9$

            and stuff like that:

            obviously they don't use round numbers etc.

            Comment


            • #7
              If they go through that much trouble, I think the price raises are quite justified

              Comment


              • #8
                We will eventually need a carbon tax to reduce our carbon output and that's when the excess packaging will go away. It will not be cost effective any more.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #9
                  That's the best thing to come out of Israel so far, after your tangerines.
                  Graffiti in a public toilet
                  Do not require skill or wit
                  Among the **** we all are poets
                  Among the poets we are ****.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    And Intel processors...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      And Bar Rafaeli

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X