Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Yes and no. Consumers are able to spend less on those goods, they are then able to spend more elsewhere. Of course, the unemployed workers here become a drag on the economy and aren't likely to find work that pays as well right away. Even liberal heroes like Krugman talk about how those workers can then be put to more efficient use in the parts of the economy where demand goes up because of new consumer spending, but people aren't as fungible as capital.
Originally posted by Kidicious
The main point is that cheaper isn't necessarily better. If I think of a way to produce more goods with that same amount of labor that's better, but if I just find employees to work for less money that's only good for me, but not society.
The main point is that cheaper isn't necessarily better. If I think of a way to produce more goods with that same amount of labor that's better, but if I just find employees to work for less money that's only good for me, but not society.
Yes and no. Consumers are able to spend less on those goods, they are then able to spend more elsewhere. Of course, the unemployed workers here become a drag on the economy and aren't likely to find work that pays as well right away. Even liberal heroes like Krugman talk about how those workers can then be put to more efficient use in the parts of the economy where demand goes up because of new consumer spending, but people aren't as fungible as capital.
Comment