Tweet
Tingkai believes there is no cause/effect relating to publishing the names of these sorts of people. He may be correct about this but the ability to study such an effect would be inherently difficult. He claims there is no effect but also does not support this with anything.
He also seems to feel the same about suicides although again he cites no proof of this and just refers to conflicting studies. The responsible media seem to disagree with him on this but I will concede there may be a legit debate on the point.
Where Tingkai loses his credibility of course is on this "conservanuts" rant he persists with (a word he finds clever apparently). He's not really interested in a serious discussion of the issue but rather would prefer a bash against those that don't agree with him.
I'd take Tingkai much more seriously if he was sometimes reasonable and occasionally right about something.
He also seems to feel the same about suicides although again he cites no proof of this and just refers to conflicting studies. The responsible media seem to disagree with him on this but I will concede there may be a legit debate on the point.
Where Tingkai loses his credibility of course is on this "conservanuts" rant he persists with (a word he finds clever apparently). He's not really interested in a serious discussion of the issue but rather would prefer a bash against those that don't agree with him.
I'd take Tingkai much more seriously if he was sometimes reasonable and occasionally right about something.
Comment