Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

brother-in-law of Trent Lott indicted

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • brother-in-law of Trent Lott indicted

    Granted it is Huffington post but it is clear that a bribery and corruption case is stocking old Trent Lott's family. Could this be way Trent tucked tail and ran so quickly?

    Trent Lott's Brother-In-Law, Nephew, Indicted On Federal Bribery Charges

    November 28, 2007 07:10 PM


    Prominent Mississippi trial attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs, the brother-in-law of outgoing GOP Sen. Trent Lott, was indicted by a federal grand jury Wednesday on charges that he and four other men tried to bribe a Mississippi state court judge.

    According to the 13-page indictment, Scruggs and three other attorneys -- including Lott's nephew Zach -- attempted to bribe Mississippi Third Circuit Court Judge Henry L. Lackey with at least $40,000 in cash.

    Lackey was assigned to hear a lawsuit in which Scruggs' firm was named as a defendant in a dispute involving $26.5 million in attorneys' fees stemming from a court settlement with State Farm Insurance over Hurricane Katrina claims.

    The indictment alleges that the bribe was intended to resolve the case in Scruggs' and his firm's favor. Also charged was Sidney A. Backstrom, an attorney at Scruggs' firm; Timothy R. Balducci, a New Albany, Miss., lawyer; and former State Auditor Steven A. Patterson, an employee of Balducci's law firm.

    Neither Scruggs nor an attorney for the firm, Joey Langston, returned telephone messages seeking comment. Langston does not work at The Scruggs Law Firm.

    Lott's office did not respond to a request for comment. Lott is not named in the indictment, and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

    Lott, the second-highest ranking Republican in the Senate, announced Monday he was resigning his seat after 35 years on Capitol Hill. Lott's decision to leave Congress came one year after he won re-election to his fourth term.

    Scruggs, long a power player in Mississippi legal circles, rose to prominence after securing huge verdicts for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, and from his role in brokering a multibillion dollar settlement with tobacco companies in the 1990s.

    He later represented hundreds of Gulf Coast homeowners -- including Lott -- whose claims were denied by insurance companies in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Lott's home in Pascagoula was destroyed by the storm.

    The case at the center of the bribery allegations involves a fee dispute between Scruggs' firm and an attorney, John Jones, who did work on behalf of Katrina plaintiffs.

    According to the indictment, the five defendants met at Scruggs' Oxford, Miss. office in mid-March to discuss the scheme. On March 28, Balducci allegedly traveled to Calhoun County, Miss. to meet with the judge in order to make "an overture" to resolve the lawsuit "favorably to the defendant Richard 'Dickie' Scruggs and The Scruggs Law Firm."

    The indictment says that Lackey immediately reported the bribery scheme to the FBI, and began cooperating with federal authorities.

    In May, Balducci allegedly had a conversation with Lackey where he said "for over the last five or six years there, there are bodies buried that, that you know, that [Scruggs] and I know where...where are, and, and, my, my trust is his, mine in him and his i mine."

    Between September 27 and November 1, Balducci allegedly made three cash payments to Lackey, returning from the last meeting with a court order favorable to the defendants.

    "We paid for this ruling; let's be sure it says what we want it to say," Balducci told Zach Scruggs and Backstrom, according to the indictment.

    On Tuesday FBI agents searched Scruggs' law office in Oxford, Miss., removing copies of a computer hard drive.

    A statement issued by the FBI office in Jackson, Miss. said the search was "in furtherance of an ongoing investigation," according to the Associated Press.

    Over the years Scruggs has given generously to the Democratic Party and its candidates. In March he donated $28,500 to the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, according to the Center For Responsive Politics. This election cycle he has given to candidates from both parties, including Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. and Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.

    Download the indictment here
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

  • #2
    I wonder why Huffington Post felt the need to mention Lott when his name didn't even come up in the investigation and failed to make an issue of the fact that he's a big time Dem supporter?
    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

    Comment


    • #3
      Slate speculated on this a couple of days ago:

      Did Scandal End Lott's Career?
      Lott's sudden resignation coincides with an FBI raid on his brother-in-law's office. Maybe that's a coincidence, and maybe it isn't.
      By Timothy Noah
      Posted Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2007, at 6:22 PM ET
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


      Obituaries for the political career of former Senate Republican leader (and current Republican whip) Trent Lott, who announced Nov. 26 that he will retire in December—a full five years before his term runs out—have entertained various theories as to why Lott is quitting his job. There's the No Fun theory, which posits that Lott, along with the 17 Republican House members and five Republican senators also choosing to retire, have simply lost their enthusiasm for promoting the policies of an unpopular president in a Congress where they lack a majority. There's the Greedy Pig theory, which posits that Lott wants to dodge new lobbying restrictions that take effect Jan. 1. And there's the Still Clueless About Thurmond theory, which posits that Lott remains puzzled and bitter about losing the top leadership spot simply because, at a 2002 celebration of Thurmond's 100th birthday, he said something nice about Thurmond's 1948 campaign for president on the segregationist Dixiecrat ticket. (Full disclosure: In his 2005 book Herding Cats, Lott accuses me of lighting the bonfire. That isn't true, but I'll own up to tossing the first log.)

      Please welcome now the Scandal theory, which is suddenly gaining traction with conservative blogger Michelle Malkin; with Harper's blogger Scott Horton; with Atlantic blogger Andrew Sullivan; and most especially with David Rossmiller, managing editor of the Insurance Coverage Law blog, which is maintained by Dunn Carney Allen Higgins and Tongue, a law firm based in Portland, Ore. The Scandal theory, which is admittedly speculative, is that legal proceedings concerning Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood and the flamboyant plaintiff's attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs, who is also Lott's brother-in-law, are about to expose improper behavior by Lott.

      Our story begins in August 2005, when Hurricane Katrina wreaked its vengeance on the Gulf Coast. In addition to depopulating New Orleans, this unwelcome weather event had the temerity to knock down Lott's 154-year-old beachfront home in Pascagoula, Miss., and also the home of Dickie Scruggs, who in addition to being Lott's brother-in-law was also Lott's neighbor. Lott filed a claim with his insurer, State Farm, but State Farm denied the claim, arguing that the culprit was not high winds, which the policy covered, but rather flooding, which the policy didn't cover. (Lott had separately purchased federal flood insurance, but that didn't come close to covering his losses.) Scruggs filed suit (subscription required) on Lott's behalf.

      Scruggs also created a Scruggs Katrina Group to pursue similar lawsuits and very likely encouraged his friend Hood to do the same. (Scruggs has given heavily to Hood's state election campaigns; just this past July, for instance, he wrote a check for $33,000.) The extent to which Hood and Scruggs have been collaborating is unclear, but an FAQ on the Scruggs Katrina Group's Web site acknowledges (here and here) that the two have shared information.

      Lott, meanwhile, declared war not only on State Farm ("Like many of you, I wondered how State Farm Insurance this week could report a surging $5.6 billion profit—up 65 percent from $3.2 billion in 2005—when our state's largest insurer has been inundated with an unprecedented volume of storm claims") but on the entire insurance industry. He introduced legislation requiring homeowner insurers to clarify what their policies cover and what they don't; he co-sponsored legislation to eliminate the antitrust exemption for insurance companies; he brought Hood up to Washington to testify before the Senate commerce committee, of which he is a member; and he entered internal State Farm e-mails concerning Katrina coverage into the Senate hearing record. According to Chuck Chamness, CEO of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, Lott phoned him last year and threatened "bringing down State Farm and the industry." It was, complained Wall Street Journal editorialist Kimberley Strassel, "a ferocious campaign of political revenge that would make even Henry Waxman envious." Strassel even called it "extortion," noting that State Farm had quickly settled with Hood and Scruggs, and paid off Lott. (The settlement has since come unglued.)

      Strassel probably didn't mean to be taken literally, but the question lingers: Did Lott's uncharacteristically liberal Senate crusade, or any support he gave Scruggs or Hood, include actions that were potentially illegal?

      We don't know. But we do know that earlier this month, State Farm sued Hood, alleging that he opened a criminal investigation of the insurer in order to force the civil settlement. State Farm persuaded the judge to unseal the case, raising the possibility that embarrassing documents involving Hood (and possibly Scruggs or Lott?) will be made public.

      We also know that on Nov. 27—one day after Lott's announcement that he would retire—the Federal Bureau of Investigation searched Scruggs' law office. Scruggs' attorney, Joey Langston, said the FBI was looking for a document "ancillary" to the Katrina litigation. Despite eight hours of searching, the G-men didn't find it, according to Langston, but they left with copies of computer hard drives.

      There may be absolutely nothing corrupt, much less illegal, about the actions taken by Hood, Scruggs, and Lott. Most of the allegations made against them have come from tort-reform conservatives like Strassel and James Q. Wilson, who are predisposed to think the worst of pro-consumer lawsuits against and increased regulation of private industry. But Lott's personal financial stake in his legislative jihad against State Farm, and the thuggish language that Chamness attributes to him, do seem unprofessional at best. Maybe the story ends there. Maybe it doesn't. If it doesn't, we'll probably know a lot more soon.

      Update, Nov. 29: Dickie Scruggs and several associates, including his son Zach, were indicted yesterday on charges of conspiring to bribe a Mississippi judge with $40,000 to rule in their favor in a fee dispute related to the Katrina litigation. Click here for a copy of the indictment. It quotes Timothy R. Balducci, another lawyer indicted in the case, saying the following:

      Well, uh, like I say, it ain't but three people in the world that know anything about this ... and two of them are sitting here and the other one ... the other one, uh, being Scruggs ... he and I, um, how shall I say, for over the last five or six years there, there are bodies buried that, that you know, that he and I know where ... where are, and, and, my, my trust in his, mine in him and his in mine, in me, I am sure are the same.

      A Lott connection isn't obvious, since this alleged scheme involves only lawyers. But whose "bodies" was Balducci talking about?

      Timothy Noah is a senior writer at Slate.

      Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2178712/
      "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

      Comment


      • #4
        Desperation over a dead horse. How is Hillary doing?
        Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
        "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
        He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

        Comment


        • #5
          Very well. By this time next year, she'll be the president-elect. So, how are you doing?
          "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by DinoDoc
            I wonder why Huffington Post felt the need to mention Lott when his name didn't even come up in the investigation and failed to make an issue of the fact that he's a big time Dem supporter?
            Because it just might be the tip of the iceberg.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
              Very well. By this time next year, she'll be the president-elect. So, how are you doing?
              I'm doing well; especially considering I'm not delusional. Thanks for asking.
              Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
              "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
              He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Oerdin
                Because it just might be the tip of the iceberg.
                Based on?
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #9
                  Drugs.
                  Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                  "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                  He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DinoDoc
                    Based on?
                    Past experience. It is surely worth a look.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You must have alot of experience not being named or even being mentioned as a suspect. My past expecience in that area tells me that not being a party to the lawsuit, benefitting from the lawyer fees, or even being a partner in the law firm that it is unlikely he was involved.
                      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        relative of an ex-politician is possibly getting jailed... who cares?

                        Originally posted by Oerdin

                        Past experience.
                        Start analyzing the news value of the stuff you read from Huffington Post, Slate and Salon. You'll soon realize what kind of conclusions you should draw from the past experience.

                        Here's where I'd link some articles about Bush's supposed (=entirely made up) drinking problems written on Slate and Salon on 2004, and an article about how he supposedly asked God for advice wrt Iraq in 2003 (=entirely made up) if I'd just find them with google. Both made a lot of noise in the blogosphere and created a lot of discussion -- both were 100% bull**** which only served to characterize the democrats as mean people trying to smear with non-existant personal issues and brilliantly diverted attention from real astonoshingly corrupt scandals of the Bush administration such as Blackwater and Halliburton.

                        Oerdin. Stop reading Huffington Post. Stop reading Slate. Stop reading Salon. They're bull****. Stop meta-analyzing supposed scandals from infotainment. You should be spending only a fraction of your lifetime on news, just enough to be aware of what happens around you in the world. Is this how you want to live your life, reading made-up BS straight from the wannabe-spinmeißters oven? My sincere opinion is that it's simply not worth the effort. You're thirty, upper middle-class and live in San Diego. This is the peak of your life, both physically and mentally. Is this really what you most enjoy in your life? If I were you, I'd focus on having sex with pretty women.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The Scandal theory, which is admittedly speculative, is that legal proceedings concerning Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood and the flamboyant plaintiff's attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs, who is also Lott's brother-in-law, are about to expose improper behavior by Lott.
                          Suddenly getting up and leaving when is sister's husband and father in law are arrested for bribery? Nope, no possibility one of them might squeal on old Trent in exchange for a lighter sentence.
                          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Do you have to practice being an idiot or does it come naturally? Even the source you quoted says it's pulled out of thier ass.
                            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well worth shaking the trees to see what falls out. BTW it was a quote from Slate, numbnuts. Yes, as has repeatedly been said it is speculative which makes your whining that much sweeter. You're whines have already been addressed in both of the articles but the theories were interesting enough to share.
                              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X