Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Powerless Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Powerless Protocols of the Elders of Zion

    ... I was sure Jewish lobby's were able to control the government of the U.S.A. and every government of the world.

    But now they are not even able to control Google.

    SHAME ON YOU POWERLESS JEWS.



    Google Israel head rejects role as censor of hate sites for search engine

    HERZLIYA, Israel: Google is not the address for stopping online hate, the Israel director of the engine whose brand name is so well known that it means searching the Internet, told a conference on Monday.

    Organizers of the conference from the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish group that counters anti-Semitism, brought examples of anti-Jewish hate material freely available on the Internet, and participants called for more action to stop it.

    But Google Israel Director Meir Brand explained his company's free-access philosophy that puts it on the sidelines of the war against cyberhate.

    "At Google, we have a bias in favor of people's right to free expression," he said. "Google is not and should not become the central arbiter of what does and does and does not appear on the Web. That's for elected governments and courts to decide," Brand said.

    Recognizing the problem, however, Google has instituted a warning system for hate entries, taking viewers to a page warning that some of the search results may be offensive, and noting that opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect Google's views.

    The problem with using law to combat hate speech online is that "technology changes so quickly," said Brian Marcus, director of Internet monitoring for ADL North America. By the time the law is amended to prohibit certain sites, he said, those sites have changed names and addresses.

    "The law is simply one tool in the toolbox for dealing with hate speech," said Christopher Wolf, chairman of the International Network Against Cyberhate. "We (also) need the voluntary cooperation of the Internet industry."

    "I applaud the efforts of Google," he said, but he called for more. He said social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook have been accused of hosting racist and religiously offensive content, and that must be dealt with.

    Avi Aviv, head of the Israeli police computer crimes unit, said "the law has not yet adapted to the many types of cybercrime," including hate speech that leads to violent acts.

    "The traditional 'scene of the crime' is changing," Aviv said. "In the past there were street gangs (who) rumbled. Today, these rumbles take place on the Internet."
    bleh

  • #2
    "At Google, we have a bias in favor of people's right to free expression," he said. "Google is not and should not become the central arbiter of what does and does and does not appear on the Web. That's for elected governments and courts to decide," Brand said.


    That's pretty hypocritical, given their PRC policy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Kuciwalker
      "At Google, we have a bias in favor of people's right to free expression," he said. "Google is not and should not become the central arbiter of what does and does and does not appear on the Web. That's for elected governments and courts to decide," Brand said.


      That's pretty hypocritical, given their PRC policy.
      I thought of that, too, but I think the distinction is that there are laws in China against certain websites, and Google is simply adhering to those laws. It still means Google is willing to compromise and be evil for the sake of money, but it's not technically hypocritical.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #4
        I thought of that, too, but I think the distinction is that there are laws in China against certain websites, and Google is simply adhering to those laws. It still means Google is willing to compromise and be evil for the sake of money, but it's not technically hypocritical.


        Read more closely:

        "At Google, we have a bias in favor of people's right to free expression," he said. "Google is not and should not become the central arbiter of what does and does and does not appear on the Web. That's for elected governments and courts to decide," Brand said.

        Comment


        • #5
          Google Israel head rejects role as censor ...
          I call bull****.

          I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
          For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by DinoDoc
            Google Israel head rejects role as censor ...
            I call bull****.

            http://www.news.com/Google-to-censor...3-6030784.html
            Google Israel is censoring Chinese Web searches?
            THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
            AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
            AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
            DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

            Comment


            • #7
              Stop pretending to be stupid, LS.
              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                I thought of that, too, but I think the distinction is that there are laws in China against certain websites, and Google is simply adhering to those laws. It still means Google is willing to compromise and be evil for the sake of money, but it's not technically hypocritical.


                Read more closely:

                "At Google, we have a bias in favor of people's right to free expression," he said. "Google is not and should not become the central arbiter of what does and does and does not appear on the Web. That's for elected governments and courts to decide," Brand said.
                That is consistent. Google is saying that if it's legal to show it, we prefer to show it; if it's illegal to show it we won't.

                China's government is elected, so they're following their self consistent rules
                <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                  I thought of that, too, but I think the distinction is that there are laws in China against certain websites, and Google is simply adhering to those laws. It still means Google is willing to compromise and be evil for the sake of money, but it's not technically hypocritical.


                  Read more closely:

                  "At Google, we have a bias in favor of people's right to free expression," he said. "Google is not and should not become the central arbiter of what does and does and does not appear on the Web. That's for elected governments and courts to decide," Brand said.
                  As snoopy said, the PRC's government is technically elected, which means that Google's statement is technically not hypocritical. I'm speaking only in technicalities here.
                  Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                  "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    "In the past there were street gangs (who) rumbled. Today, these rumbles take place on the Internet.""


                    Whats Miriam doing involved in this issue?
                    "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well, duh the Elders of Zion have been defunct for more than half a century, they barley outlived the Illuminati. But I do concede that the Orange clan has at least one Jew as its member, and probably several more employed as their minions.
                      Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                      The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                      The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Bravo for Google. The answer to hate speech isn't censorship but instead is more free speech.
                        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Oerdin
                          Bravo for Google. The answer to hate speech isn't censorship but instead is more free speech.
                          Is that why they happily censor for France and Germany?
                          I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                          For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I assume this policy was formulated after France and Germany strong armed them into censorship.
                            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              And China? Let's not forget those hate filled democracy activists.
                              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X