Tweet
Because she might be telling the truth, but she sure aint going to court with just her word
-
-
proof that US it totally screwed up.Originally posted by SlowwHand
Sour grapes to back Giuliani? And backing Hillary is what?Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"Comment
-
/me chucklesOriginally posted by Berzerker
but she sure aint going to court with just her word
Oh how naive...I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891Comment
-
Re: Fox News and Rudy Giuliani
Yeah...bias is bad. Good point.Originally posted by Berzerker
alot of us non-Republicans dont like corruption"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
So you think she has nothing? She's filing suit against political bigwigs who will smear her and she has nothing?Oh how naive...
Corruption, not bias. Do you see the word "bias" in that quote?Yeah...bias is bad. Good point.
Comment
-
You're biased against corruption.
“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"Comment
-
and thats bad, apparently
Comment
-
"non-republicans" are not the only ones against corruption."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
This statement is not inconsistent with his.Originally posted by PLATO
"non-republicans" are not the only ones against corruption.THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTFComment
-
While technically correct, there appeared to be an inherent bias in his statement. If he would be so kind as to clear that up, then I'll just move along....Originally posted by LordShiva
This statement is not inconsistent with his.
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003Comment
-
Until she coughs it up, no.Originally posted by Berzerker
So you think she has nothing?I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
I think thats part of the process she just signed onto... If you're right, she's setting herself up for bankruptcy. So employing a little logic leads me to believe she does have something on them. That, and the "character" of the people she's suing.
What do you need clarified, Plato?Comment
-
I think there are two questions here: (1) Is she likely to be telling the truth? and (2) so what?
I think the answer to (1) is "yes," for reasons Berz has pointed to: it's not likely that a person with Regan's ambition and cunning would do something of this magnitude empty-handed, and everybody at Fox seems slimey enough to make her scenario plausible.
But so what? There's no evidence that Guilliani himself had any hand in this, so at worst all it proves is that Fox is overtly, nakedly partisan and values their own agenda above honesty, decency, or the rule of law. Is there really anyone left who'd be surprised by that?"I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George CarlinComment
-
to paraphrase Romney's spokesman, such scandals negate any "character" advantage the Repub nominee has against Billary Clinton.Comment
-
oh yeah, and if Ailes is the Fox trapped in the henhouse hows that gonna look for Rudy? He wont be the nominee the way this is going...
I'm getting my buddy a really important job and my other buddy is asking people to lie for me and my buddy and I'm clueless about it? That wont sell...Comment
Comment