Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mortgage Mayhem

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mortgage Mayhem

    Lawmakers weigh mortgage overhaul

    The legislation aims to embrace 'common sense principles' that will eliminate the industry's predatory lending.


    By Jonathan Peterson, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer


    WASHINGTON -- Responding to chaos in the mortgage industry, U.S. lawmakers will soon consider a range of long-term measures designed to clamp down on abuses and require that lenders make loans that borrowers can afford to repay.

    The package, sponsored by members including Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, would make clear that the rules applied to all key participants in making loans -- notably brokers and independent lenders who have been generally overlooked by regulators.

    The measure also would impose some liability on Wall Street firms that package mortgages and resell them as securities, a process that has left beleaguered borrowers uncertain where to turn when they fall behind in payments. Further, it would mandate adequate proof of income by those who seek home loans.

    "If this had been law on January '06, I think it would have avoided some of the problems we have now," Frank told reporters today.

    Frank said the bill could pass his committee as early as next week and be voted on by House members before Thanksgiving.

    It is less clear that the Senate will move forward this year. Nonetheless, the bill embodies a broad set of federal standards that are expected to influence ongoing debate about preventing a future episode of foreclosures and turmoil in the mortgage industry.

    The bill, Frank said, embraces "common sense principles" that "will diminish predatory lending while continuing to support a vigorous mortgage market."

    Among the provisions, the bill would:

    * Establish a federal standard for home loans, requiring that mortgages only be approved in cases where borrowers have a reasonable ability to repay.

    * Prohibit any financial incentives that encourage lenders to steer borrowers into more costly loans than they qualify for, such as yield spread premiums paid by banks to brokers.

    * Restrict costly prepayment penalties charged to borrowers who wish to close out their loans, typically to refinance on cheaper terms. Such penalties would have to expire before mortgages are scheduled to reset.

    * Require licensing and registration for brokers and bank loan officers. Consumer advocates have called for such rules as a way to protect borrowers from unscrupulous lenders who may move from state to state.

    * Establish federal minimum requirements, while allowing states to impose tougher rules. Federal rulemaking and enforcement duties would go to such agencies as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Federal Trade Commission.

    "This bill represents a significant step forward to clean up and prevent a number of the questionable practices that unfortunately took hold in the mortgage lending industry in the last several years," said Rep. Melvin L. Watt (D-N.C.), a co-sponsor of the bill along with Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.). "I hope the industry will embrace the changes and allow the bill to move forward quickly."

    Earlier this year, Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) introduced a Senate bill that would overhaul lending standards. More recently, a group of Democratic congressional leaders urged the creation of a czar to help coordinate federal efforts to avoid foreclosures.

    But the prospects for a House-Senate deal in the next few weeks seemed uncertain. Lobbyists for private industry recognize that legislation may be inevitable but remain interested in limiting the costs, and also warn that a heavy federal hand could discourage credit availability even for deserving borrowers.

    Frank made clear that his bill faced short-term obstacles, but added: "I think the overall framework is a good one and will go forward."
    I was thinking about titling this thread: "Congress Slams Barn Door After Horses, Cows, Chickens, Pigs and Sheep Escape."

  • #2
    Re: Mortgage Mayhem

    Originally posted by Zkribbler


    I was thinking about titling this thread: "Congress Slams Barn Door After Horses, Cows, Chickens, Pigs and Sheep Escape."
    I'm sure the pork didn't escape.
    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Re: Mortgage Mayhem

      Originally posted by Dauphin
      I'm sure the pork didn't escape.

      Comment


      • #4
        Good luck with:
        * Establish a federal standard for home loans, requiring that mortgages only be approved in cases where borrowers have a reasonable ability to repay.
        Anyone know how many forfeitures occur after a year of house ownership (and hence, more likely due to lost income)?

        Will this get passed? I'm doubting it, between the lenders and the realtors and builders, that's a lot of lobbying to the contrary.


        edit: I'm going to be pissed if there is some bailout for those individuals that got in over there heads with housing costs.

        Comment


        • #5
          If you cannot afford something, do not buy it. FFS.

          -Arrian
          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

          Comment


          • #6
            Some banks and other lenders are catching onto the scope of the problem and have realized it's often better to work out a re-finance with the borrowers than to foreclose.

            I agree with asleepathewheel. It's not the place of U.S. taxpayers to have the their monies squandered paying for the blunders of idiot borrowers...or to bail out the greeding and stupid lenders either.

            Comment


            • #7
              a few weeks ago, a mortgage company called me from florida. they were looking for a kevin and rebecca curde/curtin/somethinglikethat. and they said knew my name and they had my number so could i please contact these people for them. wtf.

              friggin weird.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Zkribbler
                I agree with asleepathewheel. It's not the place of U.S. taxpayers to have the their monies squandered paying for the blunders of idiot[s]
                You sound like a conservative when you say stuff like that.
                I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DinoDoc
                  You sound like a conservative when you say stuff like that.
                  I'm sure you mean that in the nicest possible way.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X