US Aggressor Planned Iran-Israel-US War

[Wiglaf]

It is unverifiable. Completely. It would not be terribly surprising if true, though, since it is virtually certain the Bush administration went looking for pretexts to go into Iraq.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Yeah the aggressor thing is pretty lame.

Who cares about this story? Iraq is a bigger issue because it happened.

Don't you care, because you love Cheney and want him to be emperor?

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
It is unverifiable. Completely. It would not be terribly surprising if true, though, since it is virtually certain the Bush administration went looking for pretexts to go into Iraq.

Why do they have his credit card in Iran then?

[Wiglaf]

Please. Sometimes pretexts need to be invented to do what is right. There are volumes of political theory arguing citizens should just STFU and vote every few years and leave the rest to the big boys.

[MarkG]

we dont need pretexts. we know we are right.

"This is somebody who is the president of a country that is probably the greatest sponsor - state sponsor - of terrorism," Ms Rice told CNBC television.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7010962.stm

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Please. Sometimes pretexts need to be invented to do what is right. There are volumes of political theory arguing citizens should just STFU and vote every few years and leave the rest to the big boys.

You're so democratic. That's why we love you.

[Wiglaf]

Originally posted by MarkG
we dont need pretexts. we know we are right.

"This is somebody who is the president of a country that is probably the greatest sponsor - state sponsor - of terrorism," Ms Rice told CNBC television.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7010962.stm

Correct, the problem is we have no military capability to invade them ATM. Check back in ~10 years.

[Wiglaf]

Originally posted by Kidicious


You're so democratic. That's why we love you.

Democracy is rule by the people we elect to rule us, not rule by any little ****** walking around. It is best to leave judgments to people in power and then have people hold them accountable in like 5 years. This is Bush's theory and it is also the opinion of many others and myself of course.

[MarkG]

something related:

Mr Ahmadinejad was invited to Columbia University to address its students at the university's World Leaders Forum.

He received a hostile welcome from Mr Bollinger, who described the Iranian leader as "a petty and cruel dictator".

i dont get it, did the Columbia University president invite Ahmadinejad to tell him his opinion about him?

[Wiglaf]

No, in America we have this thing called logic, which is useful to figure out, for example, why Ahmadinejad was invited to Columbia, among other things.

[VetLegion]

MarkG, I am curious what do you find exceptional about the article you posted? Seriously? It's all common knowledge. Neoconservatives and all that.

[BlackCat]

Yeah, the israelis may make such an attack if they considered it nessecary, but I seriously doubt that they would do it due to some whim made up by a US gov.

[MarkG]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Correct, the problem is we have no military capability to invade them ATM. Check back in ~10 years.

so we're loosing the war on terror?

[Wiglaf]

Since Iran is fighting us in Iraq, and we're winning in Iraq, no, not really.

[MarkG]

Originally posted by VetLegion
MarkG, I am curious what do you find exceptional about the article you posted? Seriously? It's all common knowledge. Neoconservatives and all that.

i dont recall such a scenario ever being published by major media

then again i dont follow US politics on a daily basis....