I've always disliked the usual explanations of revolutions. They're explained with people being fed up with the rulers, overtaxed, hungry and what not.
IMHO they've been that for most of history and in most places.
I'd like to know how you rate the "inevitability" of these three revolutions:
1. The American
2. The French
3. The Russian
Had to happen, 80-20, 50-50, an accident?
IMHO they've been that for most of history and in most places.
I'd like to know how you rate the "inevitability" of these three revolutions:
1. The American
2. The French
3. The Russian
Had to happen, 80-20, 50-50, an accident?
Comment