Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Were They Thinking?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Rhine river barges.
    Thats like poor gangstas putting rims on their 94 civics and declaring themselves the ****.

    Doesn't make it so.

    In any case the racial arguement while valid for Hitler is not for the military. No part of the Barbarossa campaign planning indicates they expected Russia to role over. In fact every account I have ever read contains nothing but dismay at the initial success.
    "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

    Comment


    • #17
      [QUOTE] Originally posted by Patroklos


      Thats like poor gangstas putting rims on their 94 civics and declaring themselves the ****.

      Doesn't make it so.


      why i mentioned the swimming lessons, duh.

      In any case the racial arguement while valid for Hitler is not for the military. No part of the Barbarossa campaign planning indicates they expected Russia to role over. In fact every account I have ever read contains nothing but dismay at the initial success.


      hmm, I wonder why the generals thought it possible. I suspect wed have to analyze each one individually. Some probably simply werent smart enough, at least in terms of grand strategy. They may have misjudged soviet politics, and also misjudged how little Hitler was likely to offer the Soviets for a settlement even if he HAD taken Moscow in '41. Some may not have sincerely thought they could win, but did their duty Prussian style. Or didnt do their duty, such as Canaris.

      I guess the biggest question mark would be Guderian, who was loyal, and probably the smartest of the bunch - but wasnt his smarts mainly operational/strategic, not grand strategic?
      "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Arrian
        They thought that if they succeeded in destroying the Pacific Fleet at Pearl, several things might work out:

        1) Without our carriers, it would take us quite a while to be in a position to counterattack.

        2) Given the time bought b/c of #1, they would be able to consolidate their holdings and then maybe look to cut a deal. They would be stronger, and hopefully well-dug-in in the Pacific. We'd have a very long, hard slog ahead (not that we didn't anyway, but even longer & harder).

        I think they knew that if the didn't get our fleet (including the carriers), they were in deep ****. But they figured they were in deep **** already b/c of the resource embargos.

        They could've chosen peace, of course. But they rolled the dice instead, in a high-risk, high reward play.

        ...

        -Arrian
        Actually, wasn't the USN more battleship-centric at the start of WWII? So they would have been the main target.

        Because of all the battleships lost at PH, the USN became a carrier navy. (Also lucky that no carriers were in PH at the time of the attack, IIRC.)
        Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
        Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
        One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD

        Comment

        Working...
        X