Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This is why the Youth will remain oppressed... sorry Ozzy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is why the Youth will remain oppressed... sorry Ozzy

    LINK
    Foods Tastes Better With McDonald's Logo, Kids Say
    08.06.07, 12:00 AM ET

    MONDAY, Aug. 6 (HealthDay News) -- Most 3- and 5-year-olds who taste-tested a variety of foods said they preferred the ones in the McDonald's wrapper -- even though the foods were exactly the same, a new study finds.

    The study suggests that, like adults, young children are highly influenced by branding, experts say.

    "This study demonstrates simply and elegantly that advertising literally brainwashes young children into a baseless preference for certain food products," said Dr. David Katz, the director of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

    "Children, it seems, literally do judge a food by its cover. And they prefer the cover they know," said Katz, who was not involved in the research.

    The study was led by Dr. Thomas Robinson, the director of the Center for Healthy Weight at Packard Children's Hospital and associate professor of pediatrics and of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, in Stanford, Calif. His team had 63 children, ages 3 and 5, sample five foods: chicken nuggets, a hamburger, french fries, baby carrots and milk.

    The chicken nuggets, hamburger and french fries were all from McDonald's; the carrots and milk were from a grocery store.

    Each sample was divided into two portions: one wrapped in a McDonald's wrapper or placed in a McDonald's bag and the other in a wrapper without the McDonald's logo.

    After taste-testing, the children more often said the chicken nuggets, fries, carrots and milk wrapped in the McDonald's logo tasted better, even though the foods were exactly the same.

    "Kids don't just ask for food from McDonald's," Robinson said in a prepared statement. "They actually believe that the chicken nugget they think is from McDonald's tastes better than an identical, unbranded nugget."

    Further research revealed that one-third of the children ate at McDonald's more than once a week, and more than three-quarters had McDonald's toys at home. In addition, the children in the study had an average of 2.4 televisions in their homes. More than half the kids had a TV in their bedrooms.

    "We found that kids with more TVs in their homes and those who eat at McDonald's more frequently were even more likely to prefer the food in the McDonald's wrapper," Robinson said. "This is a company that knows what they're doing. Nobody else spends as much to advertise their fast-food products to children." It is estimated that McDonald's spend more than $1 billion dollars per year on U.S. advertising.

    "It's really an unfair marketplace out there for young children," Robinson said. "It's very clear they cannot understand the persuasive nature of advertising."

    The report is in the August issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

    McDonald's responded by saying that it is dealing with the problem.

    "This is an important subject, and McDonald's has been actively addressing it for quite some time," said McDonald's spokesman Walt Riker. "In fact, McDonald's is only advertising Happy Meals with white meat McNuggets, fresh apple slices and low-fat milk, a right-sized meal of only 375 calories," he said.

    "The fact is, parents make the decisions for their children, and our research confirms that we've earned their trust as a responsible marketer based on decades of delivering the safest food, the highest quality toys and the kind of choice and variety today's families are looking for," Riker said.

    Last December, McDonald's and nine other food companies announced the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative. The company's agreed to devote at least half their advertising to promoting healthier choices for children.

    But many experts remain unimpressed.

    "There is general consensus among those of us in public health that the marketing of foods of poor nutritional quality to children should be regulated, if not abolished," Katz said.

    Children in the United Sates are already subject to epidemic obesity and rising rates of what used to be adult onset diabetes, Katz said. Even greater threats, such as heart disease in adolescence, could become common should current trends persist, he added.

    "We have a clear and compelling mandate to eliminate any influence we find that is propagating current trends," Katz said. "The branding of fast foods and junk foods into the minds of young children is one of those influences. When product familiarity is breeding ill health, it is time to put a stop to it."

    More information

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can tell you more about childhood obesity.
    I think it's disgusting that 1/3 of the kids eat at McDs at least once a week. Josie had chicken at a fast food place today, but I can't remember the last time we took her to fast food.... Parents!
    Monkey!!!

  • #2
    So does this mean that McDonalds is going to do away with Ronald, the Hamburgler, and the other kid oriented characters in its ads?

    I have an idea. Lets commisson a larger study, encompassing every kid entering Kindergarden. After doing a food preferrence study similar to the one outlined in the OP, allow the kiddies to have McDonalds goodies, but flavored with bitter grapefruit extract. Wait a few days and repeat the food preferrence study again. Repeat the cycle until preferrence for McDonalds drops to negative numbers. Repeat the study yearly until the problem vanishes.
    "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

    Comment


    • #3
      McDonald's
      THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
      AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
      AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
      DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

      Comment


      • #4
        I wouldn't touch McDonalds with 10 foot pole. I never liked their food.
        USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
        The video may avatar is from

        Comment


        • #5
          I think that it is unethical to advertise anything toward children. Except for educational commercials like "The More You Know."

          For example:

          "Kids, sharp nails may look like yummy chew sticks, but they could be rusty and likely to cause the terrrible jaw disease, tetanus. Whenever I get the urge to bite down on a sharp rusty nail, I just pick up a pack of Laramie cigarettes and bite down on flavor. So remember, pay attention to what goes in your mouth."

          The more you know!
          “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
          "Capitalism ho!"

          Comment


          • #6
            Double quarter pounder with cheez
            THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
            AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
            AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
            DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

            Comment


            • #7
              And similar results couldn't be found among adults?
              (\__/)
              (='.'=)
              (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

              Comment


              • #8
                This is why the Youth will remain oppressed... sorry Ozzy

                The study suggests that, like adults, young children are highly influenced by branding, experts say.
                Many advertising strategies used are utterly reprehensible.

                And the content of this article should come as no surprise. Children crave familiarity in food. Because in the wild there are many poisonousness foods, and trial and error is not a good way for fledglings to learn which are good to eat and which kill you. Thus children (especially) prefer food which is "known to be good" - which would include being in a recognizable package.

                It's a pity more people don't understand this concept.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Um, i'm not going to go all extreme like blake here, but that quoted sentence implies japher is either trolling ozzy very effectively or not reading his source material

                  It also implies these scientists are morons for bothering with the study... it's not like anyone thought children were NOT influenced by branding, right???

                  I don't think it has anything to do with wilderness food hunting... I think it's just the preference for the known to the unknown that pervades everything, combined with the preference for things that you associate with happy memories, like big purple monsters, er, wait, um ...

                  <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                  I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    By the way, I certainly prefer mcdonalds to (random fast food chain i've never eaten at). McDonalds serve a fairly consistent product, that is acceptable to me in quality in most places. They don't burn the hamburgers, and their fries are usually acceptable (and I can usually go back and ask for new ones if they give me cold fries).

                    I'm not saying they're good food, but they're a pretty safe choice when it comes to fast food. That's the point of the franchise system - deliver a consistent product across the board, and people feel like they know what they're going to get when they walk under the golden arches. They do it far better than most franchises...
                    <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
                    I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I've worn Levi's for the last 30 years.

                      When I needed new denim, there was no competition. I went and found Levi's.

                      The last 2 or 3 years the denim pants I've bought have ripped out way before they should have. This time I bought a couple pairs of Levi's and a couple of alternatives.

                      I'll see which wear better and decide accordingly.

                      The point is that Levi's owned my denim money mostly based on advertising they spent on 30 to 40 years ago. If they kept the quality up, their cash would have been assured for life.

                      The other point is that you've now spent >20 seconds of your life reading about my pants. Joke's on you, and no refunds!.
                      (\__/)
                      (='.'=)
                      (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X