People and avatar

[CrONoS]

yyarghhh

[CrONoS]

my psychiatrist also said this:

he said: "I don't love you, but I find you fascinating by how much cas*(I didn't understood what he said) you can give to me without bothering"

I'm surely very special...

[b etor]

i don't even use the word 'fascinating' too often, so you must be pretty fascinating.

my psychiatrist wasn't helpful at all, so i stopped seeing him. he never called ME fascinating.

[CrONoS]

b etor: I don't really have a psychiatrist, even if my psychologist want me to have one

[b etor]

i always forget which is which.

[CrONoS]

Originally posted by b etor
i always forget which is which.

b etor I also don't really have a psychologist, even if my ex-gr tell me to have one...

[CrONoS]

ok, I'm stopping!

Why did you change you cute little bunny?

[b etor]

what in the world? i totally posted something about me confusing psychiatrist and psychologist.

[CrONoS]

don't care about it; the goal of my last post was to end the circle in a "funny way"; to finally say that I don't consult psychiatrist and psychologist.

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by cronos_qc
I also forgot LOTM:

I loved his Ben Gurion(also his new avatar) avatar, so I loved seeing him in thread!! Whatever what he wrote, the important thing was his avatar!

I like Ben Gurion, not only cause I admire the man, but because I liked his look of frazzled intellectual, it seemed somehow appropriate to my posts.

I switched to Mr. Adams, not only to be less in your face Jewish (like THAT worked), but because I thought he looked a tad more dignified, while still being both reflective and argumentative.

Yes, I also think GePap's avatar fits him well. I like the idea of FN arguing with either DBG, or JA.

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
The system places the sig line each time, after you set it up.
Just keeping the record straight.

I think he's referring to:

ACK!

[ZEE]

i never judge a poster by their avatar. i have humiliated posters on other boards with bad-ass avatars, and have gotton "destroyed" by posters with goofy ones. This also goes for screen names.

an avatar should reflect something about you, your tastes, or something significant in your life. just my opinion.

pieceâ„¢

[b etor]

Originally posted by cronos_qc
don't care about it; the goal of my last post was to end the circle in a "funny way"; to finally say that I don't consult psychiatrist and psychologist.

i saw no circle.
and yea. i got what you were doing.

[Winston]

Originally posted by Tuberski
I think he's referring to:

ACK!

No, no. The real signatures. I know it's an automatic scripting thing. However, people still choose to have them in every post, even if they don't manually type them..

Anyway, it was just intended as a parallel to the avatars. In as much as signatures often seem to also have a rather narcissistic appearance to them - and that they can also be turned off, thank heavens.

The use of smilies, short catch phrases or personal initials to end a post is different, I think. Though I've never really understood the deeper rationale for it, I've always considered it akin to signing off with "roger" or "out" on a ham radio. Also it's a bit similar to some posters' consistent use of message icons. EvC's angry face and AH's sunglassed ditto spring to mind. A somewhat curious, but harmless habit, I would think.

[SlowwHand]

My current sig line is justified.