Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Were the British colonial influences on India good or bad?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Kuciwalker
    Had the British East India Company not assumed control of the lion's share of India in the 18th century it is almost certain that France would have.


    I suspect that sentence is missing a "not".
    Fixed.
    "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by LordShiva


      She must be North Indian. Hindi and Urdu are indeed very closely related (more so than Spanish or Portuguese), but as a Hindi-speaker, I can't understand any of the other major Aryan languages.
      I speak Bengali and Assamese, too, and those two are pretty closely related (I imagine the other North Eastern languages, being tribal in origin, aren't). They branched off the Aryan language tree earlier than the Western/Northern languages, though, and are quite removed.
      She was from Bihar, but I seem to recall that her family was from Maratha.

      So would Hindu, Urdu, Punjabi, Kashmiri, Gujrathi, Sindhi, Marathi and Bohjpuri belong to the Northwest group of Aryan languages?
      "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

      Comment


      • #48
        Yup
        THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
        AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
        AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
        DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

        Comment

        Working...
        X