Quebecker's = P***ies

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Wezil


You can't be serious? Do you need links?

Why don't we ask LotM?

[Wezil]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Why don't we ask LotM?

Because Lotm engages in "shoot the messenger" on this issue. You ask him if you want. I won't bother.

[Patroklos]

You can't be serious? Do you need links?

I usually rely on first hand accounts, but if you have some that don't only pertain to the 10% of the country that comprise the borderlands with Pakistan, post away.

Germans

On second thought, you probably don't need our help with the Danes. The Germans are well rested and closer.

[General Ludd]

I don't support "our" troops.

**** them. The crazy psychopaths.

[EyesOfNight]

You can't change a country that doesn't want to change. As long as Islam exists, the middle east and all majority Islam countries will be hell holes. It is our duty to simply contain it and let them kill each other. They had their chance for Democracy and they have decided they'd rather stick with Islam. So, **** them. Let them have Islam and everything that goes with it.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Yeah. Hellholes. Like that Singapore place.

[CrONoS]

@Wezil

Are you sure about Afghanistan being insecure?

I thought the north was really secure and the south got some fighting. I've seen an interview of a military who said that he felt secure going to the local market(Kabul) buying local art stuff to bring back in Canada.

Sarah Chayes (former journalist for the Christian monitor) also build a cooperative in Kandahar... (last time I've read an interview from her, she said that Kandahar was secure... at least for herself).

And don't compare Iraq to Afghanistan; this is two different country, with two different situation.

I really think that a plan should be made, with a lot of humanitarian help and the military keeping the taleban out of power.

[Spec]

Spec.

[Ninot]

This thread scares me. I think I'm going to withdraw from it.

[CrONoS]

This thread scares me. I think I'm going to withdraw from it.

pussies

[CrONoS]

God that I hate the anti war protesters.

Ohh my God, now they say that Afghanistan was invaded by NATO to build a pipeline into their territory.

Now let make it clear.

The pipeline project was canceled. And anyway, what the heck by constructing pipeline?

You want to live in peace, be sure that a pipeline is passing by your country!

Anyway, it's also about economics development, building a pipeline passing via your country can not be so bad. It gives you some jobs and money, and can be a small means, one day to be financially independant.

Oh yeah I forgot who are the "pacifist", they are anti american and anti-everything that look like modernism. So they are against economic development, since in their Mythology, economic development is Bad!

I swear to you, you can't imagine the bull**** that is being said... and since the Quebecker's are uneducated; or unconsciously anti-american they believe these bunch of pacifist.

The Afghan government under President Karzai has tried to revive the Trans-Afghan Pipeline (TAP) plan, with periodic talks held between the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan on the issue, but little progress appears to have been made as of early June 2004 (despite the signature on December 9, 2003, of a protocol on the pipeline by the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan). President Karzai has stated his belief that the project could generate $100-$300 million per year in transit fees for Afghanistan, while creating thousands of jobs in the country.

Given the obstacles to development of a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan, it seems unlikely that such an idea will make any progress in the near future, and no major Western companies have expressed interest in reviving the project. The security situation in Afghanistan remains an obvious problem, while tensions between India and Pakistan make it unlikely that such a pipeline could be extended into India and its large (and growing) gas market. Financial problems in the utility sector in India, which would be the major consumer of the natural gas, also could pose a problem for construction of the TAP line. Finally, the pipeline's $2.5-$3.5 billion estimated cost poses a significant obstacle to its construction.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by General Ludd
I don't support "our" troops.

**** them. The crazy psychopaths.

well said

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by cronos_qc
Anyway, it's also about economics development, building a pipeline passing via your country can not be so bad. It gives you some jobs and money, and can be a small means, one day to be financially independant.

You dont have to kill ppl to create jobs.

[Patroklos]

Exactly, pipelines

[CrONoS]

I'm presently running my propaghanda job on Quebecker's.

At least, I'm trying to show to them, the 2 side of the coins.