The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Originally posted by Aivo½so
The results seem very believable to me. I don't think anybody would be complaining if the US had a higher ranking...
We wouldn't be complaining if the US had better ranking because the ranking is biased to give the US a worse ranking than we deserve. Part of it is based on defence spending. The country with the worlds largest GDP will have a high defense spending. Putting defense spending in just gives a larger country worse score. Size gives no conection to peacfulness. Large countries will also be involed in more UN peace-keeping missions. To see our reason to complain now?
to the EIU and The Economist for pissing off all kinds of people for all kinds of reasons.
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Some of the scores and categories are bullcrap.
It is unclear whether a higher or lower score is better in a certain category.
Some of the reasons behind the scores are striking.
Apparently Israel has more internal security officers and paramilitary than Iran....
Which is nonsense, considering Israel is a democracy with a weak and small police force, while the Iranian regime is half autocratic with half its military forces dedicated to guarding the regime.
I have no idea where did they pull the data for some of the scores from.
It's not that I disagree that Israel is very unpeaceful. But its relative place in the chart is totally unfounded.
95% of people live it security and peace. Which is more than you can say about a huge number of places in Africa, some failing balcan states, places bordering with russia in asia, or south american drug-lord areas.
We wouldn't be complaining if the US had better ranking because the ranking is biased to give the US a worse ranking than we deserve. Part of it is based on defence spending. The country with the worlds largest GDP will have a high defense spending. Putting defense spending in just gives a larger country worse score. Size gives no conection to peacfulness. Large countries will also be involed in more UN peace-keeping missions. To see our reason to complain now?
What do you think would be a fair ranking for the US then? I don't think the US exactly can pride itself on being very peaceful. That said, I don't deny that the US faces geopolitical circumstances that differ from those of many other countries...
The point of the study as I understood it is to point out the countries that have succeeded in creating stable relationships with their neighbors and achieving absence of violence inside their territories, and if someone would claim that the US under Bush is some kind of a model country in peace building, I'd say that the person must be on something...
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment