Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WHO do they think they are?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WHO do they think they are?

    Latest news coverage, email, free stock quotes, live scores and video are just the beginning. Discover more every day at Yahoo!

    WHO urges smoking ban in public places


    The U.N. health agency on Tuesday issued its strongest policy recommendations yet for controlling tobacco use, urging all countries to ban smoking at indoor workplaces and in public buildings.

    "The evidence is clear. There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke," said Dr. Margaret Chan, director-general of the World Health Organization.

    Tobacco use is the world's leading cause of preventable death, accounting for 10 percent of adult fatalities, according to WHO. It is responsible for 5.4 million deaths each year, a figure that is expected to rise to 8.3 million by 2030, the agency says.

    Increasing numbers of nonsmokers will also die unless governments take action, WHO said in its 50-page report. It said governments of both rich and poor countries should declare all public indoor places smoke-free, by passing laws and actively enforcing measures to ensure that "everyone has a right to breathe clean air, free from tobacco smoke."

    At least 200,000 workers die each year because of exposure to smoke at their offices and factories, according to the U.N. labor agency. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that about 3,000 deaths from lung cancer each year occur among nonsmoking Americans.

    "This is not about shaming the smoker. This is not even about banning smoking," said Dr. Armando Peruga, who heads WHO's anti-tobacco campaign. "This is about society taking decisions about where to smoke and where not to smoke."

    He cited Ireland and Uruguay as governments that have successfully tackled smoking by creating and enforcing smoke-free environments. Legislation of the kind has proved popular among both smokers and nonsmokers, according to WHO, whose policy recommendations set broad goals for its 193 member states but are not legally binding.

    Almost half the world's children — some 700 million — are exposed to air polluted by tobacco smoke, particularly at home, WHO says. The agency made its recommendations on the basis of new reports by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the U.S. surgeon general and the California Environmental Protection Agency.

    WHO said in 2005 that it had stopped hiring smokers, as part of what it termed its "public lead" in the fight against tobacco.
    It's just a recommendation, but it feels like moving one step closer to a tobacco ban, which we really can't afford to enforce. I don't know why the WHO would turn down the most competent applicant for a job based on a personal habit though.
    Lysistrata: It comes down to this: Only we women can save Greece.
    Kalonike: Only we women? Poor Greece!

  • #2
    "The evidence is clear. There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke," said Dr. Margaret Chan, director-general of the World Health Organization.


    And yet it is thought OK to leave a supposedly toxic substance available for 1st hand use by yet another generation of smokers to take up...

    What happened to other substances that were found to be lethal?
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

    Comment


    • #3
      Tobacco use is the world's leading cause of preventable death, accounting for 10 percent of adult fatalities, according to WHO. It is responsible for 5.4 million deaths each year, a figure that is expected to rise to 8.3 million by 2030, the agency says.


      This is not even about banning smoking, said Dr. Armando Peruga...

      Why not?
      (\__/)
      (='.'=)
      (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

      Comment


      • #4
        He cited Ireland and Uruguay as governments that have successfully tackled smoking by creating and enforcing smoke-free environments. Legislation of the kind has proved popular among both smokers and nonsmokers, according to WHO


        (\__/)
        (='.'=)
        (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by notyoueither
          "The evidence is clear. There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke," said Dr. Margaret Chan, director-general of the World Health Organization.


          And yet it is thought OK to leave a supposedly toxic substance available for 1st hand use by yet another generation of smokers to take up...

          What happened to other substances that were found to be lethal?
          Fentanyl is still available by prescription.
          Lysistrata: It comes down to this: Only we women can save Greece.
          Kalonike: Only we women? Poor Greece!

          Comment


          • #6
            smoking ban

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by notyoueither
              He cited Ireland and Uruguay as governments that have successfully tackled smoking by creating and enforcing smoke-free environments. Legislation of the kind has proved popular among both smokers and nonsmokers, according to WHO


              Why the laughing? It's true. Norway was one of the first in the world(perhaps the first, I'm not sure) to introduce legislation on this. First one in the 80s and second one a few years back. Both times there were a huge uproar, but after a year with the law, inquiries showed that the law was well liked both by smokers and nonsmokers.
              Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
              I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
              Also active on WePlayCiv.

              Comment


              • #8
                People who smoke in food-serving areas are tossers. Nuff said.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yeah, in a month there will be a public smoking ban here. Couldn't come too soon
                  Speaking of Erith:

                  "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by notyoueither
                    "The evidence is clear. There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke," said Dr. Margaret Chan, director-general of the World Health Organization.


                    And yet it is thought OK to leave a supposedly toxic substance available for 1st hand use by yet another generation of smokers to take up...

                    What happened to other substances that were found to be lethal?
                    Well, it's smokers own choice to poison himself. Letting him willi-nilly poison his fellow citizens, however...

                    I'm all for full criminalization of tobacco, or, should it give criminals another product to pedle, making it pharmacy-stuff.
                    I've allways wanted to play "Russ Meyer's Civilization"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      BAN TOBACCO!

                      (but legalize MJ..)

                      This is ridiculous.
                      Founder of The Glory of War, CHAMPIONS OF APOLYTON!!!
                      '92 & '96 Perot, '00 & '04 Bush, '08 & '12 Obama, '16 Clinton, '20 Biden, '24 Harris

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        ban them both

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: WHO do they think they are?

                          Originally posted by bipolarbear
                          It's just a recommendation, but it feels like moving one step closer to a tobacco ban, which we really can't afford to enforce. I don't know why the WHO would turn down the most competent applicant for a job based on a personal habit though.
                          They're a public organisation, they don't have the same profit motive that normal firms have, thus can balance taking social stands with efficiency objectives. It's not at all like moving to a ban, it's about organisations being able to choose, since the former is, as you say, pretty much unenforceable, but we don't have to enforce it if organisations choose to.
                          Smile
                          For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                          But he would think of something

                          "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Anyone have any idea how the smoking ban in the UK would affect profits for the tabacco companies? And how a possible ban in the US would affect the profits there as well?
                            You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              In Norway the ban, combined with a massive information campaign about the dangers with smoking(which arguably is the most important reason), has made the use of sigarettes fall considerably. Instead, everyone and his cat is using snuff.
                              Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
                              I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
                              Also active on WePlayCiv.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X