"Washington Madam" bags first victim

[Drake Tungsten]

This is a reason to resign??? Who cares!

QFT

[Dinner]

As it is I see nothing wrong with a guy seeing a hooker just as long as she isn't being trafficed and forced into taking part. If everyone is there of their own free will then it's fine. That said if a guy is part of an organization which spends a lot of time demonizing sex, attacking their opponent for getting a BJ, preaching "family values", etc... If that type of person gets caught with a hooker then they should be fully exposed for the frauds they are.

[Drake Tungsten]

So basically any Democrat should be allowed to sleep with hookers consequence free, but any Republican should be tar and feathered for it. That's a textbook case of hackery right there... good show!

[Imran Siddiqui]

Nah, not really... because I don't think I've ever seen Rudy Guiliani preaching family values .

[DanS]

Originally posted by Oerdin
Not really.

Basically, it was this guy's job to make sure US food assistance made it to people suffering from famine. Definitely on the side of angels.

[Drake Tungsten]

Nah, not really... because I don't think I've ever seen Rudy Guiliani preaching family values

Giuliani's personal statements and behavior don't matter. According to Oerdin's logic, he should be free game for attacks simply for being "part of an organization which spends a lot of time demonizing sex, attacking their opponent for getting a BJ, preaching "family values", etc..."

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
So basically any Democrat should be allowed to sleep with hookers consequence free, but any Republican should be tar and feathered for it. That's a textbook case of hackery right there... good show!

If a Republican doesn't take part in the which hunt against gays, or demonizing sex, or (like most of the Republicans in Congress) attacking their opponents for either having sex or getting a BJ while they themselves have mistresses or visit hookers... Then those people aren't hypocrites and should worry. If someone is actively trying to position themselves as a family values candidate and they're cheating on their wives then, yes, they should be exposed.

The hackery here is coming from you. Anyone who attacks others for not living up to their own standards of "decency" should have their faces rubbed in it when they're exposed for doing the same. It just so happens that the Republican Party has spent the last decade grandstanding on this issue and then later being exposed as lying pieces of dog crap. Thus I enjoy seeing their discomfort more.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by DanS

Basically, it was this guy's job to make sure US food assistance made it to people suffering from famine. Definitely on the side of angels.

And the politicizing of that Aid along with the ending of family planning efforts which the administration knew would cause many millions of deaths?

[Drake Tungsten]

The hackery here is coming from you.

All I've said is that the puritanical witchhunts you Americans engage in all the time are absurd.

[Ramo]

He shouldn't be fired since he was just faithfully executing the Admin's policies, however idiotic. Firing him doesn't change those policies. That doesn't mean he's not a hypocritical douche.

[Ninot]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

The hackery here is coming from you.

All I've said is that the puritanical witchhunts you Americans engage in all the time are absurd.

No more absurd than abstinance-only sex education, though.

[Zkribbler]

Originally posted by Asmodean
But he said he didn't have sex with her

I did not have sex with those women. Not with any of them. Not with Bubbles, or Crystal, or Tiffany, or Gloria, or Boom Boom, or Bambi, or Misty, or Chi Chi.


***************
On the other hand:
Q: Did his private life interfere with the performance of his public duties?
A: No.
Then shut up!

[Dinner]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

The hackery here is coming from you.

All I've said is that the puritanical witchhunts you Americans engage in all the time are absurd.

No. You defined it as hackery when I said hypocracy should be exposed. It just so happens that Republicans are the hypocrites on this issue.

[Dis]

can't a man see a whore without losing his job over it?

[Drake Tungsten]

No. You defined it as hackery when I said hypocracy should be exposed. It just so happens that Republicans are the hypocrites on this issue.

And it just so happens that the Republicans are always the hypocrites in the Oerdin-verse...