The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
education, infrastructure, etc, will do a lot more for the country than investing in oil exports and then subsidizing it to score political points with the people to prop up your failing government. (for example)
its not so much the revenus from it, its the negatives that it brings along.
i dont think that the capital they invest has necessairly outweighted the negative effects.
1. capital invested in state oil is used inefficiently (higher returns elswhere, or under different business structure.)
2. too much money/capital flying around from the oil revenues means lower interest rates and allows investments into areas which really shouldnt be invested in (for example, look at all the white elephant projects in the middle east. there have too much capital, dont know what to do with it, throw good money after bad.) can lead to more volatility, bad for foreign investors.
3. less soft money in the treasury means less possibilities of corruption, a big problem in mexico.
there may be larger pecuninary gains from investing (even inefficiently) in oil, but thats not whats going to make mexico a developped country.
getting the govt out of the oil business is not a whole other topic because as long as there is oil, there will be pressure to have it state owned (and look at how many oil exporting countries have state run/ monopolies of oil.) it goes hand in hand with having it in the first place. since its unlikely that the government will ever privatize it (too many incentives not to) the only way to break the inefficieny is for there not to be anymore of it.
How much have you had to drink?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Aparently he doesn't realise that if you have a machine which puts out more money than it takes in you are able to use the excess to pay for that other **** he wants.
Aparently he doesn't realise that if you have a machine which puts out more money than it takes in you are able to use the excess to pay for that other **** he wants.
its one thing to have the moneey to do it, its another to do it. having the money and not doing it is the same as not having the money and not doing it.
Human Development Index (top 15 oil export countries bolded, non democratic countries with **)
top 15 exporting countries weighted average HDI = 0.768. and this includes canada and norway, two countries who do not depend on oil in the same way as the others, and who becamed developped countries not by exporting oil but by developping human capita.
not only that, we have some of the worlds worst human rights violators and most corrupt and authoritarian governments,and terrorist sponsering governments.
algeria has oil too, yet 121 countries have a higher HDI that it does.
tunisia's HDI is greater than 4 of the worlds largest exporters in oil.
infact, oil has had very little effect on the HDI of these countries. with the amount of money that they make, the average of the 15 largest oil exporting countries is only 68 points higher (0.097 about 10% higher) than the world average (which includes, lets not forget, such places as the DRC and its 2 million casualities in the last civil war, and other notable failed states like Haiti). this means that these countries are in general not much better off, despite all this oil.
add the fact that one of these countries' head of state was implicated in the bombing of a commercial airliner, and you see that having all of this oil is not as great as it seems.
thats not an excuse, thats a fact. countries rich in natural resources have problems because there is a lot of incentive to steal, rebel, kill, to get the huge revenues linked to these resources. why doesnt that happen in developped countires? because those economics are based on knowledge, and human capital. you cannot steal/ kill to get someone's knowledge to make money. simply controlling a diamond mine however, gives you a huge payoff.
with all this easy money around, no wonder there exists repressive governments/ civil wars in those countries.
"Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Oil gives the government a crutch it can use to avoid making real progress.
That's the truth in a nutshell. It allows governments to not make badly needed changes though some countries have used the opportunity to advance the economy into other fields.
Comment