Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Free trade, and how it is understood by Anglo-Saxons

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Patroklos


    That should have been permatopped.
    Do you know where it is? I've been trying to find it back.
    DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

    Comment


    • Re: Free trade, and how it is understood by Anglo-Saxons

      Originally posted by DAVOUT
      Adam Smith, the worshiped icon of free-traders, is being betrayed again in the “open skies” agreement.
      Smith is not being betrayed because he never called for the elimination of all trade barriers.
      Golfing since 67

      Comment


      • Re: Re: Free trade, and how it is understood by Anglo-Saxons

        Originally posted by Tingkai


        Smith is not being betrayed because he never called for the elimination of all trade barriers.
        Useful reminder
        Statistical anomaly.
        The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by VJ



          I hope you didn't turn angry, my original reply in this thread was more directed at Burjaci than you, you know... I hope it provocates him to think of something new.
          I see you completely missed the smiley in my post.

          The replacement of pounds and square feet with football fields and 747's could have been seen by some as an indication that the post is not to be taken in a literal sense.

          BTW feeling better than someone, is not racism it can cover a wide array of states and characteristics including snobbism, megalomania and nationalism.

          Further more how can you be racist towards members of your own race? You can be prejudice and intolerant, xenophobic even, but not racist. That is unless you equate ethnicity and race, which are different things.
          Racial differences are a result of several minor physical adaptations to the local environment, ethnical differences are mostly a result of culture.

          You are off-course right that the US tolerates criticism unlike some countries but you will rarely see kind comments on poly towards Iran, China, Saudi Arabia and North Korea. That argument really doesn’t hold water unless you meant the blind anti-Americanism of certain intellectual circles.


          The only thing I have against the US are double standards, lack of universal healthcare and the practice of capital punishment.
          I'm not buying BtS until Firaxis impliments the "contiguous cultural border negates colony tax" concept.

          Comment


          • Re: Re: Re: Free trade, and how it is understood by Anglo-Saxons

            Originally posted by DAVOUT


            Useful reminder
            Any time.

            Here's some info that might interest you:

            "The W.T.O. proposal would also cut the highest United States tariff on manufactured imports to less than 8 percent, from 58 percent. For Europe, the highest tariff would fall below 7 percent, from 26 percent. Tariffs in India on imported manufactured goods would decline to about 15 percent, from an average of 19 percent, while Brazil’s would go to 9 percent, from an average of 11 percent."



            It's not just airline travel.
            Golfing since 67

            Comment

            Working...
            X