Bring your guns to DC

[ZEE]

Originally posted by Kidicious


I did insult, and I pwned you. Then I wiped my ass with that thing.

you didnt pwn a DAMN thing. you simply typed a simple in your post...

you are such a simple, stupid, and ridiculous excuse for a 'Poly poster... that the entire OT forum views you as a joke...

[Kidlicious]

Constitution = dead kids

[ZEE]

Originally posted by Kidicious
Constitution = dead kids

Kidicious= supporter of anti-socialism and violence

[Kidlicious]

.................................................. .......

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Your argument is also pretty ridiculous when you apply it to the first amendment, fourth amendment etc.

The internet didn't exist in 1789, so the government should be allowed to regulate online speech.

The government should be allowed to electronically eavesdrop on me without a warrant

and so forth

It's a logical extension from speech to expression on the internet. It is not a logical extension from personal firearms to weapons that can destroy cities.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
So I should be able to own a howitzer?

Could/did private citizens own such weapons in the time of the ratification of the 2nd Amendment? A historical interpretation seems the only reasonable one in this case.

[ZEE]

Originally posted by Kidicious
.................................................. .......

you are obviously quite speechless.... i have that effect. now go crawl back under your little communist hole and preach bull**** to mindless idiots...

[Kuciwalker]

I can safely say I will never be tempted to "click here" to view any more of AAHZ's posts.

[Kidlicious]

Go play with your shotgun.

[ZEE]

Originally posted by Kidicious
Go play with your shotgun.

umm...

my little brother is more creative than you are... BOY.

the constitution is what makes the U.S. a country... but you are OBVIOUSLY too ignorant and foolish to realize its importance. You are childish, paranoid, and ultimately... wrong

[Kidlicious]

I'll stop trolling him now. Go ahead you two.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by MRT144
Where could you purchase a firearm like that?

DUH! On Ebay!

[ZEE]

Originally posted by Kidicious
I'll stop trolling him now. Go ahead you two.

Kid AKA BOY,

now you listen to me you little POS... You come into here preaching your left wing lunacy all over the place and demanding respect. You try to make a mockery of those you argue with and you admittedly TROLL people that try to have a fair and honest discussion in the forums. you are an embarrasment and give the OT forum a bad name with your silly garbage.

i dont like you and i probably never will. little crybaby, childish idiots like you need a severe ass whooping... because you obviously need common sense beaten into you. you go against the constitution and everything the U.S. stands for. If you dont like it... LEAVE IT!!

Furthermore, your communist and anti-american tripe is a grave offense to me and my ideals. you spit in the face of the law and order... the government.. and ANYONE else that has probably supported or helped you in the past. you also preach your garbage ideals to mindless idiots that are too stupid to know any better. your ideology is a cancer that needs to be wiped out like a disease, for you are bordering on treason with your insanity.

if you continue to troll and snipe me i will have no choice but to turn back into my old self and completely embarrass and humiliate you whenever i get the chance. to finish... you are a whiny, sniveling, little crybaby thats always throws a temper tantrum when things go against you.

CHEW ON THAT... BIG BOY!
PIECE...

[Kidlicious]

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Zkribbler
the problem with this interpretation is that it ignores the reference to militias earlier in the amendment.

"There is no evidence in the text of the Second Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution, that the words 'the people' have a different connotation within the Second Amendment than when employed elsewhere in the Constitution."
We hold . . . that it protects the rights of individuals, including those not . . . actually a member of any militia or engaged in active military service or training, to privately possess and bear their own firearms . . . that are suitable as personal, individual weapons."

United States v. Emerson