Until tonight, I'd never really watched Bill Hicks perform. He died when I was 15 and wasn't really that popular while he was alive, so it's understandable that I missed out on him. As I had no way of judging, I just kind of took it on faith when people said he was funny, that he was one of the greats. And now I've found out just how wrong that perception was...
One of the boring Canadians (can't remember which one) posted a YouTube link to a Bill Hicks bit in the Conservapedia thread. I watched it and didn't think it was funny. I figured maybe it was just a lame bit, the kind only a Canuck could find humorous, so I decided to give him another chance. Thanks to the glory of YouTube, it's easy to watch old Bill Hicks bits, which I've been doing for the last few hours. And I still don't see why people think he's funny.
From everything I've seen, Hicks is one of those leftwing comics that people of a similar political stripe enjoy because they say the right things and hate the right people, not because they're actually funny. Today, the leading practioners of that kind of "comedy" are people like Margaret Cho and Janeane Garofalo. You know, comics your average English professor adores but no one else really thinks is funny.
I always figured these kinds of acts were a symptom of our polarized modern society, but seeing Hicks say the same kind of crap about George H.W. Bush that comics say about George W. Bush today makes me wonder just how early this subgenre of comedy started to develop. How far back does it go? Was Hicks the prototype? Can the sins of Margaret Cho be laid at this feet? Or do I have to go even farther back to find the person who's to blame? The input of all you elderly posters is requested...
One of the boring Canadians (can't remember which one) posted a YouTube link to a Bill Hicks bit in the Conservapedia thread. I watched it and didn't think it was funny. I figured maybe it was just a lame bit, the kind only a Canuck could find humorous, so I decided to give him another chance. Thanks to the glory of YouTube, it's easy to watch old Bill Hicks bits, which I've been doing for the last few hours. And I still don't see why people think he's funny.
From everything I've seen, Hicks is one of those leftwing comics that people of a similar political stripe enjoy because they say the right things and hate the right people, not because they're actually funny. Today, the leading practioners of that kind of "comedy" are people like Margaret Cho and Janeane Garofalo. You know, comics your average English professor adores but no one else really thinks is funny.
I always figured these kinds of acts were a symptom of our polarized modern society, but seeing Hicks say the same kind of crap about George H.W. Bush that comics say about George W. Bush today makes me wonder just how early this subgenre of comedy started to develop. How far back does it go? Was Hicks the prototype? Can the sins of Margaret Cho be laid at this feet? Or do I have to go even farther back to find the person who's to blame? The input of all you elderly posters is requested...
Comment