A Muslim Dr. Kills his wife.

[Tattila the Hun]

Originally posted by Flip McWho


According to the OP the husband is responsible for the death, for the reason stated, so we do know it is murder. Assuming the OP is true of course.

Manslaughter, premeditated murder, etc. That's for a court to decide.

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Wernazuma III


First, the NT doesn't "replace" the OT, as you might know, but "fulfill" it. Secondly, let's agree that in Jewish faith that rule applies.

Uhm, at what point are you guys actually gonna study Judaism, and not assume you can understand it from a literal (but, oddly, translated) reading of the Hebrew Scriptures?

BTW, of course the OLD Testament exists only in Christianity. In Judaism its an ETERNAL covenant. Nothing "old" about it.

[Wernazuma III]

Originally posted by lord of the mark





Uhm, at what point are you guys actually gonna study Judaism, and not assume you can understand it from a literal (but, oddly, translated) reading of the Hebrew Scriptures?

BTW, of course the OLD Testament exists only in Christianity. In Judaism its an ETERNAL covenant. Nothing "old" about it.

You took mmy bit serious?

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Wernazuma III


You took mmy bit serious?

I also had NYE and Oerdin in mind when I said "you guys" = and yeah, Im sure they realize Jews dont go around killing gays, but they could well think thats cause of some modern "Reform" thing. I doubt they know that in the Mishnah, (IE in Roman times) theres a debate on whether the death penalty for MURDER should be used more than once a generation.

There really do seem to be people who picture ancient Jewish society based on a quasi-literalist reading of the bible, and assume that it was all liberalized by Jesus.

[Elok]

Thank you, LOTM, for teaching us shame. We do know, after all, that no Jew would ever write about another culture while knowing nothing of how it actually worked .

[Imran Siddiqui]

Originally posted by Flip McWho
According to the OP the husband is responsible for the death, for the reason stated, so we do know it is murder. Assuming the OP is true of course.

As pointed out, if she was killed during a domestic argument, it could be deemed voluntary manslaughter (killing in the heat of passion) rather than murder.

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Elok
Thank you, LOTM, for teaching us shame. We do know, after all, that no Jew would ever write about another culture while knowing nothing of how it actually worked .

Im not trying to teach anyone shame. Im just tired of the "Jesus changed that awful OT, if it wasnt for him wed all be stoning people" line. Something that is implicit in the thinking of both many christians and many non-christians.

If youre troubled by the portrayal of blacks in sitcoms, post a thread about it. Note well, I was not refering to NYEs or Oerdins religion or ethnicity in criticising their posts. Why would the religion of a sitcom producer matter? Of course Jews have written idiocy. Whats the relevance of that?

[Elok]

Originally posted by lord of the mark
If youre troubled by the portrayal of blacks in sitcoms, post a thread about it. Note well, I was not refering to NYEs or Oerdins religion or ethnicity in criticising their posts. Why would the religion of a sitcom producer matter? Of course Jews have written idiocy. Whats the relevance of that?

Wow, I thought I was being way too trollish to get a bite. Way to prove me wrong.

[SlowwHand]

Don't worry. You're still an A-1 troll.

[Elok]

Thanks, Sloww. Wait, is that a compliment in Texan? Idunno; given the importance you people seem to assign to red meat, you could be saying that like steak sauce I am an unimportant additive to any properly-done troll...

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by lord of the mark
Im not trying to teach anyone shame. Im just tired of the "Jesus changed that awful OT, if it wasnt for him wed all be stoning people" line. Something that is implicit in the thinking of both many christians and many non-christians.

Actually, there's much truth to that statement.

Consider the number of crazy Christians who take the Bible (including the Old testament, since we're talking about Christians) literally. Now, imagine what these crazies would be like if they hadn't that "love thy neighbour" divine command

[:) Smiley]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
And that you shall not kill, unless when YHWH orders you to, then it's just fine.

for a moment I thought you wrote " And that you shall not kill, unless when YYYH orders you to, then it's just fine."

[Darius871]

Originally posted by Elok
Hmm, Molly's late.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by lord of the mark



I also had NYE and Oerdin in mind when I said "you guys" = and yeah, Im sure they realize Jews dont go around killing gays, but they could well think thats cause of some modern "Reform" thing. I doubt they know that in the Mishnah, (IE in Roman times) theres a debate on whether the death penalty for MURDER should be used more than once a generation.

There really do seem to be people who picture ancient Jewish society based on a quasi-literalist reading of the bible, and assume that it was all liberalized by Jesus.

What are you babbling on about?

[Flip McWho]

Manslaughter, premeditated murder, etc. That's for a court to decide.

As pointed out, if she was killed during a domestic argument, it could be deemed voluntary manslaughter (killing in the heat of passion) rather than murder.

Yes, but we can form our own opinions.